one of us
| Steve, Have you found through all your testing , that any of those powders burn cleaner than Blue-Dot? Thanks |
| Posts: 129 | Location: colorado | Registered: 27 February 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I agree - Blue Dot is pretty clean when you load hot and dirty when pressure is low. |
| Posts: 345 | Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA | Registered: 01 February 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| One powder you might want to consider in Hodgdon's new Longshot. I have had very good results with it so far in 38 Spec. + P, 357 Mag., and heavy 45 Colt loads.
Hodgdon's annual manual #1 doesn't have data for Longshot, but if you call them they will send you the supplement with plenty of data.
Good Luck, Mark in GA [ 11-19-2003, 20:41: Message edited by: Mark in GA ] |
| Posts: 552 | Location: Coastal Georgia | Registered: 22 September 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I have heard others state Blue Dot is a dirty powder, however loading it in 223 rifles and a 444 Marlin and a 45 Long colt revolver, I have not experienced this at all.
I load the rifles down to 4 grains of Blue dot with a 55 grain FMJ for a subsonic load and it is not dirty burning in the barrel at all ( 24 and 26 inch barrels.)
Just my experience with it. |
| Posts: 2889 | Location: Southern OREGON | Registered: 27 May 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Dirty? Does it matter? The next shot will sweep those flakes out. The only exception I can think of is autoloading shotguns. With heavy loads using blue dot you can gum up your Remington 1100 in a couple of hundred rouunds. Maybe look for a ball powder load?? |
| Posts: 813 | Location: Left Coast | Registered: 02 November 2000 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Yeah, it can jam up bolt lug recesses and other things mechanically if you get a lot of unburned powder spilling into an action. No problem for following bullets, though. |
| Posts: 424 | Location: Bristol, Tennessee, USA | Registered: 28 September 2003 |
IP
|
|