I used the search and found some pretty helpful results but i was just curious if anyone had finally worked a load using 110gr Accubonds.

The Nosler website gives load combination with an indicate of the most accurate load.

When I had a .270, before it migrated to one of our sons, I tried to turn it into a varmint rig using 90g and 110g bullets from different manufacturers.

I got them to move out ok with H4831 but the accuracy never seemed to be acceptable. If the critter was close enough, say under 200 yards, it worked but was very damaging to anything it hit. Beyond 200 yards it was a hail mary.

I ended up sticking with the 130g. NBT and found that it elevated the accuracy up to a point where it extended the range way out there and also provided good practice for the big game seasons in the fall. Since I was spending a lot of time chasing varmints I ended up getting a 22-250 to do the varmint work and never looked back. Shooting that .270 45-55 times a day didn't seem to be the ticket.

I've come to the conclusion, that for me, a rifle/caliber seems to "work the best" when you find the appropriate bullet weight for the most used application and then shoot it a lot to gain familiarity with the performance at all distances.

Just to give a little update to my experience. I started this afternoon working a load with IMR 4350. I started at 56 grs and ran out of light this afternoon but ended up at 58 grs. I havnt ran one through the chrono yet but shot a 1" group with 4 shots at 100 yds with 58 grs in a Tikka m695 with a 22" barrel. I will continue with my loading tomorrow to see if I can dial them in a little tighter.

Jason, back when I only has a .270 Win, I shot prairie dogs with the 90gr Sierra HP's. Like Teancum, I didn't have very good luck with H4831 and the lighter bullets, but H4895 was a different story.

I was shooting a max load of H4895 in necked down Army brass. I was getting 3500fps, and sub moa groups. It would sure launch the p-dogs high into the air.

The 110gr AB was designed with the 6.8 SPC in mind, but it could still be fun in a .270 Win.

Taking a look at the quickload data I'd probably try:

RL17
W760/H414 (they are the same powder)
Hunter
4895 (which ever one I had on the shelf)
4350 (again which ever one I had on the shelf)
RL-15
H380.

I think any of those could have Potential. They are more or less in order of velocity potential, but I'd probably start with the two or three that I had, or shot the most.

I hope this helps. Let me know if there is something more I can do for you on this.

Here's what QL says about IMR4350 and a 22" barrel:

 Cartridge          : .270 Win. (SAAMI)
Bullet             : .277, 110, Nosler AccuBond 54382
Useable Case Capaci: 62.522 grain H2O = 4.060 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.340 inch = 84.84 mm
Barrel Length      : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm
Powder             : IMR 4350

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 0.862% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-08.6   92    53.00   2919    2082   44797  11094     92.2    1.124
-07.8   93    53.50   2947    2122   46039  11215     92.7    1.110
-06.9   94    54.00   2975    2162   47315  11334     93.1    1.095
-06.0   95    54.50   3003    2203   48626  11451     93.6    1.081
-05.2   96    55.00   3031    2244   49974  11566     94.0    1.068
-04.3   97    55.50   3059    2285   51360  11678     94.4    1.054
-03.4   98    56.00   3087    2327   52785  11788     94.8    1.041
-02.6   99    56.50   3114    2369   54251  11896     95.2    1.028
-01.7   99    57.00   3142    2412   55758  12000     95.6    1.015  ! Near Maximum !
-00.9  100    57.50   3170    2455   57309  12103     95.9    1.002  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0  101    58.00   3198    2498   58904  12202     96.3    0.990  ! Near Maximum !
+00.9  102    58.50   3226    2542   60546  12299     96.6    0.977  ! Near Maximum !
+01.7  103    59.00   3254    2586   62235  12392     96.9    0.965  ! Near Maximum !
+02.6  104    59.50   3282    2631   63973  12483     97.2    0.953  ! Near Maximum !
+03.4  105    60.00   3310    2676   65763  12570     97.5    0.941  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.3  106    60.50   3338    2721   67605  12654     97.8    0.930  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 3% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 3% relative to nominal value:
+Ba    101    58.00   3249    2579   62034  12275     97.6    0.967  ! Near Maximum !
Data for burning rate decreased by 3% relative to nominal value:
-Ba    101    58.00   3143    2413   55801  12080     94.6    1.014  ! Near Maximum !