THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
electronic or beam scale
 Login/Join
 
new member
posted
I now have my fathers old Redding beam type scale and I'm not sure of the accuracy being that it was in storage for twenty years or better and it might have gotten banged around a bit. I have loaded some pistol shells with it and reduced the charge a little so not to run into any problems. What I want to get is a new scale and don't know what would be the best for me. I don't do any mass producing of ammo, but am looking at a RCBS chargemaster. Any pro's or con's of these automatic dispensers and scales. They aren't cheap but looking at some good quality beam types, they are fairly expensive too.I I've heard of some scales having a dampening which mine does not have and drives me crazy. any thoughts
 
Posts: 11 | Location: north wisconsin | Registered: 27 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Get a set of check weights and see if yours is OK. I have a 5-0-5 with magnetic dampening and like it.

Not a huge fan of electronic scales myself. (Basically just because I can't afford a Chargemaster Wink)
 
Posts: 139 | Location: Fairmont, WV | Registered: 08 February 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Definitely check weights...you will want/need them for either type. I have a couple of both...beam and electronic scales. Won't be happy til I have a Chargemaster either.
Electronic scales work great if you use them EXACTLY the way the instructions read with regard to flourescent lights, drafts, calibration, warm up time and are the catsass for weighing objects that you don't have a nominal weight for. A lot of people put more faith in a beam scale but my personal experience is that many of the same problems exist with those as with an electronic...again check weights are the true test.
 
Posts: 901 | Location: Denver, CO USA | Registered: 01 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Reloader
posted Hide Post
I don't like electronic scales for anything but, case seperation and bullet seperation. For that they work great.

For loading I don't like a electronic at all. They are a real pain when trying to trickle that last little bit and you have to rezero them often. IMO it's hard to beat a good beam. I like my old M5 Lyman made by Ohaus. I like to be able to see that beam slowly rising on that last little trickle of powder. I also have a Dillon Precision and Lee, they all work fine.

Good Luck

Reloader
 
Posts: 4146 | Location: North Louisiana | Registered: 18 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of AZ Pete
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by northwoods39:
I now have my fathers old Redding beam type scale and I'm not sure of the accuracy being that it was in storage for twenty years or better and it might have gotten banged around a bit. I have loaded some pistol shells with it and reduced the charge a little so not to run into any problems. What I want to get is a new scale and don't know what would be the best for me. I don't do any mass producing of ammo, but am looking at a RCBS chargemaster. Any pro's or con's of these automatic dispensers and scales. They aren't cheap but looking at some good quality beam types, they are fairly expensive too.I I've heard of some scales having a dampening which mine does not have and drives me crazy. any thoughts


Clean the pivots and bearing surfaces with alchohol, (the pivots are usually hardened steel "knife edges", they bear on surfaces that are normally polished stone, inspect those surfaces for damage. Make sure that the beam swings freely (not draging on anything), and confirm the scale with check weights. Odds are the scale is good to go. Age doesn't have much effect on balance beam scales.

As others have stated, balance beam scales are a "must have" electronic scales are just a "nice to have" for some exercises, such as segregating bullets or brass by weight. For powder weighing, I will always have more trust in a balance beam scale.


NRA Patron Life Member
 
Posts: 310 | Location: Arizona | Registered: 24 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Northwoods I have load many a thousands of rounds with a reddings just like you have.

It is now siting on display with lots of old reloading stuff the new magnetic dampered ones are so much faster. The redding is just as accurate but takes for ever to settel down.
 
Posts: 19835 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of woods
posted Hide Post
I have the RCBS Chargemaster and have nothing but good things to say about it. It has made powder charging much more pleasurable.

It has 2 ea 50 gr checkweights with it and I calibrate it each time I turn it on. I used to check it with the balance beam but have stopped because it is always right on. The trick is to wait 5 seconds after it beeps and it will give you the weight in the pan. Sometimes the last trickle will drop too much. About 2 or 3 times in 25 loads. If it does just dump the pan back in the hopper and push the buttom again.

Like poetry in motion. dancing


____________________________________
There are those who would misteach us that to stick in a rut is consistency - and a virtue, and that to climb out of the rut is inconsistency - and a vice.
- Mark Twain |

Chinese Proverb: When someone shares something of value with you and you benefit from it, you have a moral obligation to share it with others.

___________________________________
 
Posts: 2750 | Location: Houston, Tx | Registered: 17 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Ol` Joe
posted Hide Post
AZPete said it better then I can, your beam scale is likely fine and as accurate as any.


------------------------------------
The trouble with the Internet is that it's replacing masturbation as a leisure activity. ~Patrick Murray


"Why shouldn`t truth be stranger then fiction?
Fiction after all has to make sense." (Samual Clemens)

"Saepe errans, numquam dubitans --Frequently in error, never in doubt".



 
Posts: 2535 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 20 January 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of smedley
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ol` Joe:
AZPete said it better then I can, your beam scale is likely fine and as accurate as any.


DITTO!!

If you are looking for a new scale, I would suggest an RCBS 10-10!


______________________

Smedley

______________________
From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'
B.H.Obullshitter
------------------------------------
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery"
Winston Churchill
------------------------------------
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." Samuel Adams
------------------------------------
Facts are immaterial to liberals. Twisted perceptions however are invaluable.
------------------------------------
We Americans were tired of being thought of as dumb, by the rest of the world. So we went to the polls in November 2008 and removed all doubt.....let's not do it again in 2012 please.
 
Posts: 3242 | Location: Cruising through the Milky Way at 98,000fps | Registered: 03 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
northwoods: when you use the scale, notice if the beam is moving equal distance above and below the zero point without hesitation. if it is it's okay but you need check weights. rcbs has them. the redding scale in my collection was made in the late 50's and i use it occasionally. also if the beam is moving equal amonts above and below the zero the weight is correct, reading the beam while it is moving is the most accurate.
 
Posts: 94 | Registered: 07 February 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator

Picture of Mark
posted Hide Post
If you don't have any check weights, while you are waiting for them to arrive you can weigh a couple different bullets to give yourself an idea if your scale is working properly.

As mentioned, not much to go wrong with a beam balance.

Note, that a 180 grain bullet will most likely not weigh 180 grains, but will be a tenth or two off. But it will give you faith that your balance is accurate at the higher end of the scale. You can also measure a couple smaller weights, like pennies and dimes, then total them up and weigh the quantity of them.

Most everything I load for seems to shoot best several grains below maximum anyway, so I don't really explore the upper limit anymore which is an added safety factor.

Even if this one is undamped, it will make a nice backup to an electronic should you decide to get one (which is what I would do in your situation I think)


for every hour in front of the computer you should have 3 hours outside
 
Posts: 7786 | Location: Between 2 rivers, Middle USA | Registered: 19 August 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Hunt-ducks
posted Hide Post
Reloader I'm with you on the electric there more work then I want to do.

RCBS 10-10 here
 
Posts: 450 | Location: CA. | Registered: 15 May 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
RCBS 10-10 for me also. Electronics fail and they need a power source also. And you still need a backup for it. Simple works.

You know the lifetime waranty on Leupolds? It is only good for 3 yrs on electronics like the illuminated reticle. Read the fine print.
 
Posts: 1159 | Location: Florida | Registered: 16 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Lyman Ohus, 42 years and still accurate. (it's a beam scale)


"An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man is a slave", Ceasar
 
Posts: 211 | Location: NW OHIO | Registered: 15 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I use an electronic scale to weigh bullets, cases, anything but powder going in to a case. I'm with others who don't like the response you get from an electronic scale when trickling in the last bit of powder. It's much more to my taste to scoop in most of the powder with a Lee powder scooper then finish it off with a trickler.

You might say I use a beam scale when I can set the scale and add to the pan unto I reach weight. I use the electronic for anything where the weight is unknown and the scale will tell me the weight.
 
Posts: 41 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: 03 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
oldbeam scales are as good as new ones.....just check them out and use them out and use them

I really don't care for electronic scales...at least the ones I've used so far.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Thanks for all the good advice. I think I'll upgrade to a dampened beam type with the lee scooper and the trickler. This keeps things simple. In the future I might get an electronic scale for bullets and cases and such.
 
Posts: 11 | Location: north wisconsin | Registered: 27 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
I think anyone that does not like the RCBS Chargemaster just has not used it. It is a wonderful tool. Trickles every charge for you to just right. Tells you if it screws up. Can't imagine going back to not having one.

I think saeed uses one almost exclusively in the testing lab.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
J. Lane Easter, DVM

A born Texan has instilled in his system a mind-set of no retreat or no surrender. I wish everyone the world over had the dominating spirit that motivates Texans.– Billy Clayton, Speaker of the Texas House

No state commands such fierce pride and loyalty. Lesser mortals are pitied for their misfortune in not being born in Texas.— Queen Elizabeth II on her visit to Texas in May, 1991.
 
Posts: 38617 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
I think anyone that does not like the RCBS Chargemaster just has not used it. It is a wonderful tool. Trickles every charge for you to just right. Tells you if it screws up. Can't imagine going back to not having one.

I think saeed uses one almost exclusively in the testing lab.


Yep!

You can use a sledgehammer to drive fenceposts instead of a tractor cause the tractor might run out of gas....give me a break--how much reloading are you doing when the power goes out--do you use a candle or a coleman lantern to load by--keep your powder away!

Electronic scales are the new paradigm. They are calibrated the same way as a beam--with check weights.

The RCBS is the zoot-capri!

PS--I have two beams, and three digitals (including one labratory grade digital) and they all return results that are within hairs breadths, interestingly, the one that will go heavy easiest, is one of the beams. --You fix that with.....check weights.
 
Posts: 3563 | Location: GA, USA | Registered: 02 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
both types work fine,each can be fussy,as stated above use check weights and always double check your scale weight and always zero your scales each and every time you use them, i like my rcbs digital, but i think i wore it out!....regards jjmp
 
Posts: 999 | Location: wisconsin | Registered: 26 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of FMC
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fish30114:
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
I think anyone that does not like the RCBS Chargemaster just has not used it. It is a wonderful tool. Trickles every charge for you to just right. Tells you if it screws up. Can't imagine going back to not having one.

I think saeed uses one almost exclusively in the testing lab.


Yep!

You can use a sledgehammer to drive fenceposts instead of a tractor cause the tractor might run out of gas....give me a break--how much reloading are you doing when the power goes out--do you use a candle or a coleman lantern to load by--keep your powder away!

Electronic scales are the new paradigm. They are calibrated the same way as a beam--with check weights.

The RCBS is the zoot-capri!

PS--I have two beams, and three digitals (including one labratory grade digital) and they all return results that are within hairs breadths, interestingly, the one that will go heavy easiest, is one of the beams. --You fix that with.....check weights.


Well I also use my tractor to put in T posts, either that or a wetback.

I've never used a beam, period. I think I threw mine out when I got the Redding starter kit- looked too cheaply made to be accurate.

I've got an RCBS powder dispenser, which I used to use to throw a quick charge into the powder in my tray. It is very accurate a real pleasure to use, but it is sooooooo gooooood daaamn sloooooooooooowwwwwwwww. I wound up getting an Harrel powder dispenser to throw .25-.10gr less charge and then use a tweezer to top it off. I use jewelers scales, one is accurate to +/-.05gr, the other +/- .02gr (1 kernel of powder).

To each his own. Digital scales are just so easy to use. I also can afford batteries too Smiler




There are two types of people in the world: those that get things done and those who make excuses. There are no others.
 
Posts: 1446 | Location: El Campo Texas | Registered: 26 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by northwoods39:
I now have my fathers old Redding beam type scale and I'm not sure of the accuracy

I've heard of some scales having a dampening which mine does not have and drives me crazy. any thoughts


As some have pointed out, your simple redding doesn't need to be still to read the centre of the swing. The manual for them states this and also to use your thumb and finger to bracket the pointer and a light touch on the pointer will stop it.

Mine is as accurate as needs be, and if your trickling the powder into the pan just as it starts to move up it will stop swinging almost straight away.
Naturally we all need more and better gadgets, but I've kept the cheap Redding while selling off some dampned scales that didn't measure up.
Good pun?

Check weights are great. I've never seen a beam that needed them to check accuracy, but I use them often to set the weight I require, which helps eliminate the possibility of you putting up the wrong setting, if you zero when empty.

I found electric to be good and quick, but mine wandered off zero about every 20 minutes or so.
And if you want to be a fussy puss, they can only read to a tenth of a grain, where as a beam can read to about one granual, and about 5 of them little sticks to a tenth grain. (For what it's worth, probably nothing.)

I've had an electric flash up and down a tenth so I suppose it was maybe measuring to a twenty ith, or maybe it was just undecided. Smiler

Anyway the swinging Redding will more than do the job, but if it doesn't swing she's buggered.
 
Posts: 2355 | Location: Australia | Registered: 14 November 2004Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Just received a RCBS 10/10 and powder trickler today. Got both off of Ebay for $100. It is a very nice scale and I like the dampening. I think it will be a step above the redding.
 
Posts: 11 | Location: north wisconsin | Registered: 27 February 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
northwoods39 ----- I load between 3000 and 4000 loads per year, therefore my method may not be typical, but here it is. I use two of the older Lyman Autoscales that are set up with only one powder each. The Autoscales are electronic dispensors that also have a dampened beam scale that levels when the set amount is dispensed. I can use either of those beams whenever I so desire. I also use a Lyman 1200 Electronic dispenser and it is also set up with only one powder all the time. In addition to these three dispensing scales I have one of the new Lyman 1500 electronic scales with the powder trickler for the powders I may use that are not in the dispensers that are loaded with my most commonly used powders I shoot weekly. I really love the new Lyman because it has a zero button that is reccomended you push every 15-20 loads just to be sure you are still zeroed. The powder trickler is very, very handy also. When you shoot as much as I do, you tend to find the quicker steps somewhere down the line. Yep, I have some money invested but this is what I do instead of Golf, so what the hell, reloading and shooting in preparation for a hunt is what makes me tick. wave Good luck and good shooting.


phurley
 
Posts: 2371 | Location: KY | Registered: 22 September 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia