THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Magnum Primers for 30-06?
 Login/Join
 
new member
posted
Hi all- first time poster here...
I "inherited" smome various reloading supplies from a relative. Among the loot was a box of 1000 Winchester Large Rifle Magnum Primers. I do quite a bit of reloading / tinkering with 30-06, mainly with IMR 4350 and 4064 for my Model 70 and 7400 carbine. Is it safe to use the magnum primers with my IMR? Anybody already done that experiment?


"Dyin' ain't much of a livin"
 
Posts: 1 | Location: Maine | Registered: 05 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rex Rat
posted Hide Post
I’ve used mag primers in 308 win although both accuracy and velocity suffered. The only exception to the rule I have seen was with a well compressed charge and CCI mag primers. If you “must†burn them start with the min charge and work it up SLOW.


Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 93 | Location: Somewhere in this multiverse | Registered: 18 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rex Rat
posted Hide Post
http://www.6mmbr.com/PrimerPix.html Not all primer are created equal!
Roll Eyes


Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 93 | Location: Somewhere in this multiverse | Registered: 18 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of beretta96
posted Hide Post
WOW that's pretty fascinating, should have new respect for trying different primers.

Those remingtons were really hot!
 
Posts: 263 | Location: ontario, canada | Registered: 10 January 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Basel:
Is it safe to use the magnum primers with my IMR? Anybody already done that experiment?

Absolutely.....just work up as usual.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
You'll likely find little difference between WLRs and WLRMs, particularly in a case as large as .30-06. As Vapodog says, work up just as you would with any load.
 
Posts: 13263 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Not that I don't find the photos of primer flashes that Rex Rat posted interesting, but looking at the flash is like looking at the light produced by a light bulb and inferring how hot the bulb is or the amount of electricity going through it. To some extent there may be a correlation, but it is doubtful that it is in linear proportion to the apparent "flash". The actual energy produced by the primer and its effect on the perfomance of a given load cannot so easily be inferred.
 
Posts: 13263 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I use magnum rifle primers in all my '06 length & 308 length brass that use ball powder. Been doing it for years. Somewhere along time ago I was told that ball powders can be hard to ignite in cold weather. Whether true or not it became a practice with me and I still do it to this day with good results.


Rooster
 
Posts: 1018 | Location: Lafourche Parish, La. | Registered: 24 October 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Andre Mertens
posted Hide Post
My Sauer 202 has 7x64 and .30-06 bbls. Both average <.75 MOA with Sierra GK and N 160 powder :

7x64 : 160 GK / N 160 / 56.0 (CCI 250 primers ! NB. : std. primers produce vertical stringing);

.30-06 : 165 GK / N 160 / 60.5 (WLR std. primers for nice, round groups).

I'm not more surprised than that as I'm a firm believer that each rifle/bbl. is a law upon itself.


André
DRSS
---------

3 shots do not make a group, they show a point of aim or impact.
5 shots are a group.
 
Posts: 2420 | Location: Belgium | Registered: 25 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stonecreek:
Not that I don't find the photos of primer flashes that Rex Rat posted interesting, but looking at the flash is like looking at the light produced by a light bulb and inferring how hot the bulb is or the amount of electricity going through it. To some extent there may be a correlation, but it is doubtful that it is in linear proportion to the apparent "flash". The actual energy produced by the primer and its effect on the perfomance of a given load cannot so easily be inferred.


I was think that too. And duration is an issue that may make flashes look "bigger" when they just last longer. But the larger particles burning in the Remington & RWS samples were a surprise. Looks like a really different design philosophy than the others.


"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
 
Posts: 11142 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia