one of us
| NorthSniper,
You can probably get that from their web site. I would be interested in why you would use the 200 over a 180. I spent months experienting between 150 - 250 grain in my 300 WSM for a recent elk hunt and the 180 performed the best. Velocity, accuracy and down range "impact" (pick a way to measure since few tend to agree) was greater by the books.
Harley |
| Posts: 36 | Location: Charlotte, NC | Registered: 04 January 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| 99% of the time you can fit the round to function in the magazine and thats as long as you can use it and it will still be short for factory throats, so it makes little difference unless you shoot them single shot....... |
| Posts: 42226 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Harley, Just wondering what you mean by the 180gr performed better than the 200gr Accubond? I'm just starting to play with the Accubonds now so I'm curious as to what your experiences where. The 180gr TSX shoots very nicely out of the 300 WSM thought I'd try the Accubonds they also appear to be a very good bullet. I thought the Accubonds might perform well for my son out to 250 or 300yds it's not likely he will be shooting at any game beyond that. |
| Posts: 113 | Location: no fixed address | Registered: 09 August 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| If the TSX is shooting good your quest is over, I think they are the best terminal bullet out there. You might want to consider trying a lower wt bullet, you will still get the terminal performance with less recoil. |
| Posts: 189 | Location: Asheville NC | Registered: 24 February 2003 |
IP
|
|