One of Us
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6923/e69230a01625eab412dd74553e3fa5c8695955ca" alt="Picture of Old Elk Hunter Picture of Old Elk Hunter"
| If the neck provides enough neck tension I see no reason to change it unless you are trying to get a particular bullet to fit in the case and also get close to the lands. In that case you might consider having the barrel set back and rechambered with a throat that suits your needs. Often factory rifles have a lot of "leade" or distance from the end of the case to the beginning of the rifling. Weatherby does this all the time to control pressure peaks. Most folks think that the shorter the distance from the bullet to the rifling is the best. You'll have to decide.
RELOAD - ITS FUN!
|
| |
One of Us
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab8d1/ab8d15684c98ef5c4f4139cfece24fb21773e048" alt="Picture of Ralph Hyrlik Picture of Ralph Hyrlik"
| You could form a SAUM case from a WSM case. The result would be a longer neck and a tighter fit in the chamber. The down side is that the form dies would be expensive. |
| |
one of us
| If you keep the case the same length and lengthen the neck, all you'll do is reduce powder capacity.
Yes, the bullet won't protrude into the powder capacity as far, but since you have less to start with you will still be left with less. The shank of the bullet at a certain OAL takes up the same amount of powder capacity, be it in the neck or below the neck.
In other words, you will see no gain. Don't worry about it--shove them in there. |
| Posts: 920 | Location: Mukilteo, WA | Registered: 29 November 2001 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
one of us
| GCA,
You said " 4350 ", H4350 is great in 300 WSM under 150 - 155 Gr. bullets !
Travis F. |
| |