THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Using Old Primers?
 Login/Join
 
new member
posted
I have several hundred primers(cci 109) that are probably 30 years old which i used for shotshell reloading back in the day. I'm now considering doing some target shooting with a new 30-06 and wonder if they will work for rifle cartridge reloading. Are they even the right size. etc? I would be using for light recoil 110 grain bullets with H4895. Thoughts, opinions? coffee
 
Posts: 12 | Location: NW Ohio | Registered: 01 October 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If they were properly stored they're probably still good for shot shells but they won't fit rifle cartridges. For the '06 you'll need large rifle primers.
 
Posts: 8169 | Location: humboldt | Registered: 10 April 2002Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Thanks for your prompt reply craigster Smiler . As you can see, i am new to metallic cartridge reloading, so will likely be looking to the veterans here for help.
 
Posts: 12 | Location: NW Ohio | Registered: 01 October 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
30 years old


That's not old.

I'm still using some of Grandads primers.
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Oddbod
posted Hide Post
I can't recommend enough that those new to reloading buy a copy of Lyman's reloading manual - I have both 48th & 49th editions.
Reading it will enlighten you to the differences between various primers & other components & the necessity of using the correct ones. You will also have a netter understanding of reloading principles & thus more confidence in your ammunition.

PS I'm still using CCI primers from 1980.
 
Posts: 610 | Location: Cumbria, UK | Registered: 09 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
lee243--Your description of light recoiling 110 grain bullets in a 30-06 makes me strongly believe you have yet to shoot any of them. If you haven't, you will be disappointed--recoil is right there with the recoil of the heavier bullets. Ditto on the Lyman Manual.
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My ditto on the Lyman Reloading manual did not mean it recoils--it meant get one if you don't already have one.
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
one of us-carpetman
Posted 23 December 2011 20:17 Hide Post
My ditto on the Lyman Reloading manual did not mean it recoils--it meant get one if you don't already have one.


Thanks for the recommendations on the Lyman manual guys. I always followed published reloading data very carefully when i was doing a lot of shotshell reloading, so will do likewise with rifle reloading. I am aware that changing recipes can result in big pressure increases, so plan to be very conservative. I do however think that loading a 110 grain bullet at moderate velocities should result in significant recoil reduction(compared to, say standard 150 grain factory ammo)...after all isn't that the formula that Remington's managed recoil ammo uses?
 
Posts: 12 | Location: NW Ohio | Registered: 01 October 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Lee 243--I did a quick look and most of the 110 grain loads were in the 2700fps starting range. That is going to be a blasty and fairly heavy recoiling load. Not as much reduced nor as much different from a 150 grainer as you hope for. Cast your own bullets and by using Unique powder, for example and get them down to about 1600 fps and then you'll have it. Not much more blast or recoil than a .22 rimfire. Same cast bullet around 2400 fps will kick every bit as much as a 30-30. Try the 110's and give us a report.
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
lee243--Here is a recoil formula you might find useful. This formula does not give recoil in pounds--just a factor number you can use for rough comparisons. The number is not linear. 20 and above you'll find to be kickers. Bullet weight (in grains)+ powder charge (in grains) X muzzle velocity (in fps) divided by 3500 (constant) divided by rifle weight (in pounds). Compare one you know to an unknown and you'll get a pretty good idea.
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
lee243--I mentioned using cast bullets and I mentioned getting a Lyman Reloading Manual. Lyman is one of the older companies supplying casting equipment, thus their manual has reloading data for cast bullets as well as jacketed. It also has information about casting, which is what got me interested in casting over 40 years ago. Some will make casting sound like rocket science and very elaborate equipment needed. Not true. You can get started fairly economically and it is fairly simple process. You can shoot cast bullets a lot cheaper than buying jacketed.
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Cci 109's will not fit in a30-06 case!!!! Am I missing something? I read all of the other post. You cannot do this.they will work fine in shot shell cases but not rifle cases!!!
 
Posts: 54 | Location: Alb nm | Registered: 29 March 2011Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Bella1
one of us
Posted 28 December 2011 20:28 Hide Post
Cci 109's will not fit in a30-06 case!!!! Am I missing something? I read all of the other post. You cannot do this.they will work fine in shot shell cases but not rifle cases!!!


That was addressed in one of the first responses Bella1, but thanks for pointing it out again. My dumb leaked out at the git go. homer
 
Posts: 12 | Location: NW Ohio | Registered: 01 October 2011Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia