05 December 2001, 11:41
<Al Smith>Talley or Kelbly rings?
I'm having a new .300 RUM built and am trying to decide between Talley rings or Kelbly rings. What do you guys prefer? Is one or the other stronger?
Al
[This message has been edited by Al Smith (edited 12-05-2001).]
[This message has been edited by Al Smith (edited 12-05-2001).]
05 December 2001, 11:51
GeorgeSKelbly rings are usually installed on benchrest guns. They may or may not be designed for the recoil of a .300RUM sporter.
Contact Kelbly directly and ask them; I know Talleys will handle the recoil.
George
------------------
Shoot straight, shoot often, but by all means, use enough gun!
05 December 2001, 16:22
Bill LeeperThe Kelblys are a very lightweight ring. For strength I would be inclined to go with the Talleys or Warnes. Regards, Bill.
06 December 2001, 14:45
<David>I've been using Kelbly rings, the 30mm double screw model with a Nightforce scope on a 7mm STW and a 300 Win Mag for about a year and a half now. No problems with ring strength.
06 December 2001, 15:13
<Bill>I am not that familiar with the Kelby, but the Talley rings and bases I own are excellent.
------------------
www.rifleshooter.com
06 December 2001, 16:03
<Steve in MI>Let me know what ones you get and how they work out. I looked at the others but the price was more than I could afford. I have Burris signatures on my 300 RUM for over 400 hot loads with no trouble. I like the off set bushing. I am building a new LR gun with a custom action so maybe for that gun.
07 December 2001, 13:32
AtkinsonTalleys really work.
------------------
Ray Atkinson
ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com