THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Scale may be off
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I bought a 2nd hand RCBS 505 scale a while back and weighed some bullets in it to check it and sure enough, 140 grain bullets weighed at 140 and 150 gr. bullets at 150.

I'm having some difficulty with a load though and maybe the scale is weighing low. How can I confirm if my scale is weighing correctly?
 
Posts: 63 | Registered: 28 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Generally, if a balance beam scale zero's out ok, then it is fine.

You can also get another one and check it against it as well.
 
Posts: 270 | Location: Cedar Rapids IA | Registered: 02 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Is it still weighing the bullets correctly? why do you think it's weighing low?


Aim for the exit hole
 
Posts: 4348 | Location: middle tenn | Registered: 09 December 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Blacktailer
posted Hide Post
Make sure you carefully clean the pivot points of the beam and the base. Then if it zeros with no load and weighs known weights such as bullets it is probably OK. You could go to the expense of buying a set of calibration weights but I don't see why that would be necessary.


Have gun- Will travel
The value of a trophy is computed directly in terms of personal investment in its acquisition. Robert Ruark
 
Posts: 3831 | Location: Cave Creek, AZ | Registered: 09 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have access to analytical scales at work and I made my own check weights, which I verified on the work scale.
 
Posts: 1230 | Location: Saugerties, New York | Registered: 12 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
why do you think it's weighing low?


See my entry regarding the 270 in the Medium Bore Rifles forum
 
Posts: 63 | Registered: 28 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
why do you think it's weighing low?


I'm the guy that posted about the 270 bullet dropping 7 1/2 inches in 100 yards on the medium bore forum. You answered me there.
 
Posts: 63 | Registered: 28 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
the most likely situation is that your 200 yard range is actually a three hundred yard range


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
the most likely situation is that your 200 yard range is actually a three hundred yard range


My error, sorry.

The range is measure in metres. It is a 200 metre range.
 
Posts: 63 | Registered: 28 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Buy yourself a set of check weights. Lyman used to sell them, along with others. Make sure whatever you get has traceability to NIST. I have a set I bought a million years ago and use them periodically just to make sure. Note, I have never found any of my scales off by more than +-.1 g in all the years I have used them.
C.G.B.
 
Posts: 1103 | Registered: 25 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hu, I almost hate to ask this, but did you use the wrong powder?

Maybe H4831 when the recipe called for H4350, or RL22 instead of RL15???

While your at it, I'd suggest pulling apart one of your left overs and reweighing the powder (If you haven't done so already). Some time we are off by 10 grains and don't notice it...
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks.

I pulled one and weighed it and it was indeed 57 grains.

I was loading my 7x57 first with H4350 and I'm certain I put the H4350 away along with the 7mm bullets when I switched to the 270 and brought the H4831 and 270 bullets from my locker.
 
Posts: 63 | Registered: 28 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Oddbod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hublocker:
Thanks.

I pulled one and weighed it and it was indeed 57 grains.

I was loading my 7x57 first with H4350 and I'm certain I put the H4350 away along with the 7mm bullets when I switched to the 270 and brought the H4831 and 270 bullets from my locker.


If you'd loaded 57gr of H4350 behind that 150gr bullet I reckon you'd have known about it. Eeker
 
Posts: 610 | Location: Cumbria, UK | Registered: 09 July 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If you'd loaded 57gr of H4350 behind that 150gr bullet I reckon you'd have known about it[/quote]



I agree.
 
Posts: 63 | Registered: 28 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hu, you are running me out of idea's..... bewildered

Any chance your barrel is slightly bent downwards, or you were shooting into a 30 mph head wind?
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
If you used the same scale to load up for the 7x57 and you also checked a couple of bullets and they measured close to expected weight, I think I'd drop the focus on the charge weight being the issue.

Someone in the other thread was thinking perhaps something to do with your barrel. Have you checked the crown of the barrel? Cleaned the barrel?

Did you by chance have to make significant adjustments to the scope to get it where you wanted at 100 meters when you took this load to the range?

Sorry if you've covered these already.
 
Posts: 584 | Location: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: 13 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Okay, you are going to think I am crazy, but what are you shooting at at 200 meters? What size dot? It takes very little movement of crosshairs to make a 3 or 4" change at 200. You are only using a 4X. That in itself is somewhat limiting. Not talking down your setup, just speaking from experience... How big a dot are you shooting at? Can you accurately center it in the hairs with the 4X?

Something else to think about: cloudy or bright sunlight? We shoot lower when it is cloudy because the target is not lit as well. And again, 4" is not much crosshair change when you are shooting 200+.
 
Posts: 4748 | Location: TX | Registered: 01 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
What size dot?

The 200 metre target the range sells has a big white dot about the size of a teacup.

It's a big target, about 3-feet square.

Crown is good, barrel was clean and no, the scope was already set fine for 100 yards.
 
Posts: 63 | Registered: 28 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well, so what all have we eliminated:
Crown.
Barrel was clean.
Scale was checked.
bullets were pulled and powder charge was checked.
Scope is a Leupold, no parallax.
Stock is glass bedded.

Did you check your rings and mounts to make sure everything was tight?

You were loading .277 bullets and not .284's??? You were loading for your 7x57 before you loaded for the .270??
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'll check the rings.

I put the 7mm bullets away in the cabinet when I got the .277 bullets.
 
Posts: 63 | Registered: 28 January 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Ol` Joe
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Antelope Sniper:
Well, so what all have we eliminated:
Crown.
Barrel was clean.
Scale was checked.
bullets were pulled and powder charge was checked.
Scope is a Leupold, no parallax.
Stock is glass bedded.

Did you check your rings and mounts to make sure everything was tight?

You were loading .277 bullets and not .284's??? You were loading for your 7x57 before you loaded for the .270??


Nothing left but those damn bullet gremlins.


------------------------------------
The trouble with the Internet is that it's replacing masturbation as a leisure activity. ~Patrick Murray


"Why shouldn`t truth be stranger then fiction?
Fiction after all has to make sense." (Samual Clemens)

"Saepe errans, numquam dubitans --Frequently in error, never in doubt".



 
Posts: 2535 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 20 January 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BNagel
posted Hide Post
Have you mic'd those ".284" 150-grainers yet?
This has the earmarks of a .277 seated in place of 7 mm. Saeed once had Walther on with .270 loads in a Blazer of some 7 mm caliber and put the video out. Rounds were hitting at 50 yards on the ground!!!


_______________________


 
Posts: 4893 | Location: Bryan, Texas | Registered: 12 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
I haven't seen this asked yet, so I'll ask it.

Have you mic'd the .277 bullets to confirm their diameter? It is always possible that the factory got the wrong label on the box and they are actually something like 139 grain 6.5m/m (.264") bullets....

(I doubt it, as they would have been awfully loose in the case necks, but it never hurts to check EVERYTHING.)


My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still.

 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'm starting to lean toward a loose scope set up. Try taking your scope, rings, and bases competely off. Then with a little brake fluid or other solvent, clean all of the screw holes and screws. Then put it back together with a little lokt tight as you go. Whilst you've got the scope off, it would be a good time to try another scope with a proven track record.
Before you take the scope off, at 100 yards, you can try shooting a square. See if the scope is tracking correctly. You can also shoot a group --at 100-- and then bounce the butt of the rifle sharply on the ground a couple or three times and then see if it's shooting to the same POA.


Aim for the exit hole
 
Posts: 4348 | Location: middle tenn | Registered: 09 December 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Buy a box of factory ammo. Shoot it at 100 yards and then at 200 yards. Let us know what happens.


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
I'm the guy that posted about the 270 bullet dropping 7 1/2 inches in 100 yards on the medium bore forum.

IF you're using book velocity projections to support your concern that your powder charge may be low you're leaning on a very weak idea.

Most of us find load book velocities to be happy guesses; it's not often are they very close to what we're actually getting. Affordable chronographs took the BS out of a lot of hopeful beliefs.

I suspect your scale is plenty accurate.
 
Posts: 1615 | Location: South Western North Carolina | Registered: 16 September 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia