THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Re: 22/250AI Barrel life
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
something is wrong if you shot it out with 1300 rounds. It took about 4000 for a .220 Swift and most of these were at 4000 fps.
 
Posts: 2788 | Location: gallatin, mo usa | Registered: 10 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
You kinda answered your own question..if pressures are kept equal there will be no difference. I agree with JStevens, Andre. Your experience is very unusual. 22-250AIs should last more or less as long as 223s, all else equal.
 
Posts: 11142 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I shot a Ruger #1 Varminter at prairie dogs for about ten years. During that time I shot out three barrels, but got close to 4500 rounds from each barrel before it needed replacing. When I did replace a barrel, I sent it back to Ruger where they installed a factory (heavy) barrel.

I think the main thing that shoots out a barrel is heat. Fred Smith at Bullberry told me that every few minutes while shooting, I should grab onto the barrel in front of the forepiece with my bare hand and if it was hotter than I wanted to hang onto, GIVE IT A REST. He said that would be about 120 deg F at the forepiece and would mean the chamber and throat area is getting hotter than it should. Well, of course I violated that rule rather regularly and shot out my barrel after 4500 rounds. And I mean shot out. I could drop a bullet into the throat and it would go in about an inch past the end of the brass. Also the accuracy was dropping off pretty badly.

Don Shearer
 
Posts: 223 | Location: Centennial, CO USA | Registered: 14 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

You kinda answered your own question..if pressures are kept equal there will be no difference. I agree with JStevens, Andre. Your experience is very unusual. 22-250AIs should last more or less as long as 223s, all else equal.




How do I tactfully say your opinion doesn't come close to the reality of the situation? Hope I've done such because no flame is intended.

Barrel steel erosion is a function of the heat produced, the volume of gas generated, the total BTU's of heat produced and where it burns. The slower the fuel, with some minor considerations to cartridge design-- the more that erosion is transferred and extended down into the bore.

To say the AI and the 223 were in the same ballpark isn't even close. The former burns what-- maybe 35-55% more fuel with each hammer drop? You simply pay for those trajectory numbers with barrel steel and life.

3 mm's would be around .1" right? Sounds about right for the capacity.
 
Posts: 1529 | Location: Central Wisconsin | Registered: 01 March 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia