THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
RCBS Electronic powder measure and scale
 Login/Join
 
<Caveman>
posted
I am thinking of buying the RCBS Electronic powder measure and scale. I think it would speed up my reloading process and deliver more accurate weights of powder. Does anyone out there have them? Do you like it? Thank you.

Corey

 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Zero Drift
posted Hide Post
Corey - I use the RCBS auto thrower for my big bores. It works very well and keeps velocity SD within my Redding hand throws. A trick that I learned with the auto thrower is to use a Lee powder scoop to quickly get within 20% of the throw weight. This speeds up the auto thrower significantly. By the time I have seated the bullet, check OAL with a Stony Point comparator (first 5 or so rounds) the next throw is ready. It really speeds up the process.

One point to consider - Set up time takes a little longer in order to warm up the digital scale. You should turn you scale on at least 20 minutes before you begin to weigh.

 
Posts: 10780 | Location: Test Tube | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Corey:
I am thinking of buying the RCBS Electronic powder measure and scale. I think it would speed up my reloading process and deliver more accurate weights of powder. Does anyone out there have them? Do you like it? Thank you.

Corey


I have the set and they work well but as the other post states you do need to give them a few?10min?or so to warm up and you calibrate them with each powder by just mashing a button....they are so accurate and sensitive that a fan or open door will mess up the readings.....I also throw the charges a little light and let the disp. finish them off...If I could only have one it would be the scale....they are great for case weight and sorting rimfire shells.....be sure to get the cover or make one as I did from a clear plastic square container to keep dirt and dust from the scales and from dropping/setting a heavy object on the scale by mistake....enjoy...good luck and good shooting!!!!

 
Posts: 687 | Location: Jackson/Tenn/Madison | Registered: 07 March 2001Reply With Quote
<.>
posted
Don't know anything about the powder measure.

But I have the RCBS digital scale. Takes about 20 min to get warmed up and setttled. You need to place it out of drafts (AC/heat) and on a surface that's not going to get jostled by your reload operation -- a separate bench from the press bench.

The digital scale has its applications. I use it to weigh brass, bullets. I double check charges off a beam scale with it.

BUT --

The digital has a 0.10 gr. increment. The scale somewhere has to make a distinction between 0.04 gr. and 0.06 gr. The 0.04 gr. will read "0.00 gr." and the 0.06 gr. will read "0.10 gr." -- Neither reading is correct!

For accurate charges, I use a beam and trickler. I can get the witness mark on the beam probably to within 0.01 gr. That's WAY more accurate than a digital that is rounding off to a tenth grain.

The digital is EXCELLENT for tasks like fast weighing the powder capacity of a case. Or the weight of brass, a bullet, etc.

My choice would be the RCBS Uniflow charger, a beam scale, and a trickler. I trust the Uniflow for tossing accurate loads for "plinking."

------------------
.223 Ackley Improved Wildcat Forum:
http://www.hotboards.com/plus/plus.mirage?who=223ackleyimproved

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I own an old RCBS digital scale, bought then very expensive.

Its so much more convenient than another scale, I won�t part with it.

After adjusting, I throw some charges for the powder to settle. then I do 10 charges in some jar and weigh them. I not this result before and after powder charging in my books. This takes out the decimals.

But I don�t think wheter X.04 or X.06 is really any difference. In a 25 Auto maybe ..

Hermann

------------------

 
Posts: 828 | Location: Europe | Registered: 13 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Corey,

Take a look at a review of those items at this site:

www.realguns.com/archives/032.htm

FWIW, I went back to using my balance beam scale after using a PACT digital scale for a while. The PACT scale was great for sorting brass by weight or for measuring case capacity in terms of H20, but it would start to drift and be inaccurate when I would use it for weighing powder charges (especially when I needed to trickle in a few kernals of powder). I don't like having to recalibrate frequently.

Save your cash and buy something else.


--------
I know the next rifle will be perfect.......

[This message has been edited by Need Just 1 More Gun (edited 04-25-2002).]

 
Posts: 267 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: 01 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bob338
posted Hide Post
Powder weight is the component having the least effect on accuracy in a cartridge. If one tenth grain seems to cause a problem, then that problem is elsewhere than the powder charge.
 
Posts: 1261 | Location: Placerville, CA, US of A | Registered: 07 January 2001Reply With Quote
<Abe Normal>
posted
The RCBS automagic powder dispenser, ah yes, I killed 3 of them! Not by choice mind you, it just worked out that way.

If all you are ever going to use are powders like AA2230 or Bullseye or Unique or an extruded type powder such as Varget or IMR-4895 you should be OK. However if you are going to load H110, AA#9, WC820 or similar type powders (powders of VERY fine granule size) you will jam up the works, as did I. I had 3 of the RCBS Powder Master Elect Dispensers, before we (RCBS service dept & I) were able to sort out what the problem was. Every time I tried to load .30 Carbine, that was the last time that that unit would work! Turns out that the fine granule powder I was using (AA#9 & WC-820) was working it's way into the bearing surfaces of the dispenser tubes and jamming them up quite solidly.

In the end, RCBS being the great company they are, gave me a full refund INCLUDING my shipping costs! The only caveat to this story is that this all happened to me about 2 years ago. So it is possible that RCBS has sorted out this problem with the "newer models". You may want to check on this with them BEFORE you purchase if you intend to use a very fine ball powder like the ones mentioned above.

Further the Electronic Scales, in my opinion are no where near as accurate or repeatable as a good quality balance beam scale, such as the RCBS 10-10. Unless of course you are willing to spend many hundreds of dollars for a top of the line Ohaus electronic scale.

Genghis, hit the mark, (The digital has a 0.10 gr. increment. The scale somewhere has to make a distinction between 0.04 gr. and 0.06 gr. The 0.04 gr. will read "0.00 gr." and the 0.06 gr. will read "0.10 gr." -- Neither reading is correct!). To my way of thinking + or - 0.1 grain is not good repeatability, hence not an accurate scale! On the other hand there are those that will argue that + or � 0.1 grain will make no difference in your loads. Well, perhaps. In a cartridge such as 30-06 or 300 Win-mag 0.1 grain one way or the other may not be noticed. But can the same be said for 9mm Luger or 25 ACP?

Just my 2 cents worth,

------------------
Abe

If everyone thought like me, I'd be a damn fool to think any differently!

 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Zero Drift
posted Hide Post
Bob - To expound on your point a little bit, the only way to measure your "loading" accuracy (not to be confused with target accuracy) is through Standard Deviations in velocity. Unfortunately, target accuracy is not determined by the precision of your charge weights. To obtain single digit velocity SD�s you must be able to throw accurate powder charge weights in addition to a host of other variables.

Many new hand loaders believe that target accuracy is achieved through proper charge weights. In application, you can load by charge volume and achieve target accuracy if you have addressed all other accuracy gremlins. Many bench rest folks don�t bother with weighing each powder charge down to the tenths of grains. Most throw on volume and shoot.

Maintaining consistent case volume is critical in maintaining pressure and in turn, maintaining low SD�s. One way to accomplish this is to purchase premium brass, trim all to the same length, and segregate the cases by weight. If the volume of the pressure vessel is consistent (case volume), and you are burning the same amount of fuel (powder), and you are maintaining consistent resistence (bullet friction), then you can control velocity SD. Of course, once this is accomplished, you can then focus your attention on the other 75 common accuracy gremlins in order to achieve target accuracy.

Throwing precise charge weights is far down the accuracy variable list.
/
/
Abe - I agree that the auto thrower is not good on ball or flake powder. All my big bores shoot H-4831SC or simular extruded powder. I use a Harrel and a Redding thrower for my ball powder. The best way to ensure your scales are accurate is to use a set of check weights. If I am going to throw a 53gr load, I zero my scales with a 50gr check weight. Many scales are not properly calibrated throughout their weight range. I have found a few balance beam scales off by a grain or two as you move through heaver loads. The only way to know is with a check weight set.

[This message has been edited by Zero Drift (edited 04-25-2002).]

 
Posts: 10780 | Location: Test Tube | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of hivelosity
posted Hide Post
I have posted this several times over the past couple years
I have a Lyman Autoscale It will load ANY powder that you put through it. it will load flake like green dot red dot, bullseye, VERY CONSISTENT the scale has a balance beam with a coarse feed and a trickle feed. You can run a fan in the room just aim it away from the scale. You do not have to wait for it to warm up Oh, did I mention it has an adjustment for speed so you can adjust for the diffrent granules of powder. Dam one draw back I had to change my reloading routine now I seat a bullet between charges.
Sorry go carried away check it out for you self I really like mine
dave
 
Posts: 2134 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 26 June 2000Reply With Quote
<.>
posted
Hmmmmm . . .

Charge volume, not charge weight. Makes a lot of sense to me. I'd be interested in seeing some real data on it. I'd be interested in running some real data on this idea.

Anyone want to list the "75 accuracy gremlins" ???

------------------
.223 Ackley Improved Wildcat Forum:
http://www.hotboards.com/plus/plus.mirage?who=223ackleyimproved

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Genghis,

I don't know if you have ever been to a benchrest match, but a majority of those guys load by volume--and they shoot tiny groups.

The only way to know for your gun is to try doing it both ways for a sizable # of rounds, and see if the accuracy or SD of velocity is substantially different.

------------------
I know the next rifle will be perfect.......

 
Posts: 267 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: 01 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of milanuk
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Need Just 1 More Gun:
I don't know if you have ever been to a benchrest match, but a majority of those guys load by volume--and they shoot tiny groups.

FWIW, I've been noticing the apparent discrepancy btwn 100-200-300 yd benchrest shooters, many of whom throw charges rather than weigh, and the long-range boys, including 1k-yd benchresters, who from what I gather, weigh their charges, almost exclusively. For these guys, getting ES/SD numbers down close to/in the single digits is critical.

Go figure...

Also, FWIW, I'm kind of swinging the other way, myself. I started out by getting a Pact electronic dispenser and scale set. Supposed to be accurate +/- 0.1 gr, though I hear a lot of people claim 0.2 or so. Biggest problems w/ mine is it frequently needs re-zeroed, and a tendency to over throw on heavier charges of stick powder. I've somewhat overcome that by either setting the dispense value a couple tenths low, or throwing a light charge (0.5gr under target weight) w/ my Redding BR30 (even worse w/ stick powders) into the pan, and then put the pan on the scale and hit 'Dispense'. Usually the dispenser/scale combo will hit right on +/- 0.1 w/o taking so long.

I've been considering investing in a good balance beam scale, for a variety of reasons. But I'll start another thread for that.

Monte

 
Posts: 341 | Location: Wenatchee, WA | Registered: 27 February 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia