THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Selecting Powders
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I learned something new today from Nosler's newest reloading guide #6. (Hey, I like that term...GUIDE...they're not claiming it's gospel, just a guide!) But I don't know what to do with it or how to use it.

Anyway, p.36 says: "In working up our loading data tables, we chose the powders that we felt would give the optimum performance for each cartridge. The burning rate of a certain powder is considered when loads are developed for specific cartridges. Nosler uses the formula:Feet Per Second divided by Grains of Powder=Burn Rate for a particular cartridge."

The only 'Burn Rate' I've been aware of is the relative burn rate chart. The one powder manufacturers list canister grade powders, from fast burning Bullseye to slow burning H870.

What use is Nosler's formula to you? Or me, for that matter.
 
Posts: 4799 | Location: Lehigh county, PA | Registered: 17 October 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
What use is Nosler's formula to you?

absolutely none.....as a matter of fact it's what many reloaders call efficiency....the velocity per grain.....and that number has no value to me at all.

Someone at Nosler is high on something....or just thinks he is!


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Case density, maximum velocity and the standard deviation of velocity would all seem to be both objective and more useful metrics to use for guidance.


analog_peninsula
-----------------------

It takes character to withstand the rigors of indolence.
 
Posts: 1580 | Location: Dallas, Tx | Registered: 02 June 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
Roll EyesIt may be some what indigative of comparing powder burn rates relative to each other, but the numbers change between cartridges if I understand the original posting. I have not read the guide myself. Eeker

EXAMPLE: Looking at the 300H&H Mag A-XMR4350 would yield the same number as IMR4831.From other cartridges this relationship varies.

I can see where these numbers can not only be missleading but might be dangerous were the unwary use them for interpolation. beerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'll pipe in with a time proven tip ; Watch your AZZ !. Burn rates vary as nothing is set in

stone . Example one powder may be listed on a particular burn chart as 84

while on another chart that same powder might be listed as 81 or ?.

One thing is certain , re loading manuals are GUIDES !. As all of us who have been

around the block more than once know , everybody's manual can list different load data

for a particular cartridge . General ballistics rule #1 , heavier bullets require slower

powders and less of a charge , than lighter projectiles which can use faster powders .
 
Posts: 4485 | Location: Planet Earth | Registered: 17 October 2008Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia