02 September 2002, 12:22
<bearlake>300 RSUM -vs- 300 WSM
Is there any real differance in these two new cartriges as far as case capasity or velocity?
02 September 2002, 12:47
dan belisleThe WSM line has slightly more case capacity. From the factories, there are no practical velocity differances. - Dan
02 September 2002, 13:20
ready_on_the_right90-100fps according to Nosler #5...so basically NO
I wouldn't lose sleep over choosing
I have a .270 WSM, but if a .270 SAUM came out first I wouldn't have been upset!!
Mike
02 September 2002, 13:35
Marsh MuleReady_on_the_right; have you done much reloading of your 270wsm yet? If so, what kind of results have you gotten?
TIA,
MM
02 September 2002, 13:36
<bearlake>I'm thinking of getting a 7mm SAUM in a savage with a 24" barrel. What is the recoil like on the short mags?
02 September 2002, 13:51
Dave JenkinsIf you look closely at the Nosler #5 you will see that they tested/developed loads for the Win with a 26" tube and the Rem with a 24 incher. That being the situation it appears that the Remington is slightly more efficient. I was surprised by this given the case dimension and called Nosler to discuss.
Dave
03 September 2002, 13:08
dan belisleThat's interesting, Dave. What did Nosler have to say about it?
03 September 2002, 19:42
CMcDermottThe WSM calibers don't fit the Remington model 7 magazine. So Remington will load WSM calibers as ammo, but you can't buy a Remington rifle chambered for a WSM cartridge.