THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Which bullet? Barnes X or Partition
 Login/Join
 
new member
posted
Got my choices narrowed down for my Savage 7 Rem Mag to either the Barnes 175 X or 175 Partition. Wondering which would be the better choice for accuracy. Would like to get sub 1 inch groups if possible.

Thanks
Von
 
Posts: 10 | Registered: 11 March 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Obviously you will not know until you try 'em. My experience has been that I can always get Partitions to shoot pretty well. I have struggled with the X, though when it shoots well (like in my 9.3x62's) it shoots incredibly well. It's performance on game for me in Africa was equally incredible though the Partition has always worked for me on game up through elk. I am now leaning towards the X unless I can't get it to shoot accurately...
 
Posts: 354 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 11 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of todbartell
posted Hide Post
Although I have gotten good accuracy in my 7mm with the 175 gr. X, I would bet on average the Nosler will shoot sub MOA more often. Plus, that 175 gr. X is sooooo long, it cramps alot of powder space. The 175 gr. Partition is long as well, but is short compared to the Barnes X. Go with the Nosler, IMHO.
 
Posts: 857 | Location: BC, Canada | Registered: 03 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Gatehouse
posted Hide Post
If you are looking for similar terminal performance, a 150 or 160 X is "equal" to a 175 Partition, give or take...

I've found X bullets to give excellent accuracy, but so has the Partition. Your rifle wil let you know which one it likes best, I guess...
 
Posts: 3082 | Location: Pemberton BC Canada | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
PARTITION-- NO CONTEST, [Smile]
 
Posts: 19 | Location: Winchester, VA | Registered: 01 May 2003Reply With Quote
<phurley>
posted
Von -- Only your barrel can tell you, it is up to you to shoot enough different bullets to determine the one it likes. I always start with North Fork, Partition, Barnes, Swift, for animals over deer size. Lessor size animals may get standard bullets or the above, once depending on what my barrel likes. The worst mistake is pick a bullet and then when it doesn't shoot well, discard the rifle. [Wink] Good shooting.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dave Jenkins
posted Hide Post
X or Triple shock but as tod said I'd go lighter, 150 or 160grain.
 
Posts: 569 | Location: VA, USA | Registered: 22 January 2002Reply With Quote
<eldeguello>
posted
I have gotten much better accuracy, overall, using Nosler Partition bullets than from Barnes X's, and in calibers from 6mm to .375 H&H!!
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
If I was using the X-bullet in 7mm Rem Mag, I would choose a 160-grain. If I was using a Partition, I'd choose either the 160-grain or the 175-grain, depending upon what my barrel preferred. All three are outstanding bullets, used regularly with success, the world over.
 
Posts: 254 | Location: Vancouver, Canada | Registered: 10 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
I have never really gotten great accuracy from the 'X'. It seems very picky about vel., distance to the lands, moon & tide cycles, etc. I have always gotten at least good (1-1 1/2MOA)accuracy from the NP in every caliber I own. The only bullet my .338-06 shoots sub MOA is the 210grNP. I also like the good expansion I get from a Nosler w/ more than enough penetration for any angle shot (JMO).
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia