THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Federal 215 GM primers
 Login/Join
 
One Of Us
posted
I've been told that the Federal 215 "Gold Medal" primers are more consitant than the standard Federal 215 primers.

Is there any truth to this, or is it just a sales gimmick?
 
Posts: 2662 | Location: Oslo, in the naive land of socialist nepotism and corruption... | Registered: 10 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BigRx
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ErikD:
I've been told that the Federal 215 "Gold Medal" primers are more consitant than the standard Federal 215 primers.

Is there any truth to this, or is it just a sales gimmick?


Erik, sometimes I think they are over the chronograph and other times I don't; they haven't been worse though. Plan Fed 215's have always been consistent for me but if both are on the shelf I will pick the Gold Medal match everytime........... Just like I deburr flash holes I guess!

BigRx
 
Posts: 208 | Location: Idaho Rockies | Registered: 25 December 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Ditto BigRx.
If there is a difference, I can't tell it.
I would like to find out just what quality control or material difference there is between the two. I never tried to contact Federal directly to ask. Sumbuddy who know?
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
I've tried them in my 7mmDakota & while I get a bit more consistancy over the F215, they shoot about the same as thr RP9 1/2M. Once you get a load you like, try diff. primers & see if it helps or hurts, never know until you try.


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The story I heard was this:

Primer manufacturing relies on hands-on labor. Spreading the primer compound into the cups, etc.

Federal keeps track of the employees who have the fewest problem primers. In other words, do the best job.

So Federal puts those employees on the task of making Match primers. So the primers should have a more consistant amount of primer compound, less likely to be missing the anvil or whatever.

I use them on my hunting rounds, but I still visually check them for missing compound, anvil or too much sealer goop before seating them in the case.

But I have never had a problem with any Federal primer anyways. Big Grin


"There always seems to be a big market for making the clear, complex."
 
Posts: 1372 | Location: USA | Registered: 18 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bob338
posted Hide Post
quote:
So Federal puts those employees on the task of making Match primers. So the primers should have a more consistant amount of primer compound, less likely to be missing the anvil or whatever.

True story. You can accomplish much the same if you weight sort the regular 215's. I've never noted a difference but I still prefer using both the 210M's and 215M's for peace of mind. The weight sorting isn't worth it to me.
 
Posts: 1261 | Location: Placerville, CA, US of A | Registered: 07 January 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The Federal Gold Medal primers are held to stricter manufacturing standards than are the standard primers. This "should" lead to more consistancy and therefore better performance.

However, it is hard to tell much difference in some guns.

I own some of each. I have a couple of rifles that I simply cannot tell the difference when I switch from the standard Federals to the match version. I have others that CLEARLY shoot better when fed the match version of primer.

You just have to check if you are really that interested. I own a 300 Wby Magnum that simply shows no difference at all when using Fed 215 versus the 215M. But I own an identical rifle in 7mm Wby Magnum that gave a 28% reduction in average group size when I tried the match primer. (I am talking a bunch of test groups, not just one or two.)

I finally just standardized on the Gold Medal Fed 215M or 210M depending on the cartridge.

R F


R Flowers
 
Posts: 1220 | Location: Hanford, CA, USA | Registered: 12 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by McCray:
The story I heard was this:

Primer manufacturing relies on hands-on labor. Spreading the primer compound into the cups, etc.

Federal keeps track of the employees who have the fewest problem primers. In other words, do the best job.

So Federal puts those employees on the task of making Match primers. So the primers should have a more consistant amount of primer compound, less likely to be missing the anvil or whatever.

I use them on my hunting rounds, but I still visually check them for missing compound, anvil or too much sealer goop before seating them in the case.

But I have never had a problem with any Federal primer anyways. Big Grin


Well ain't that special! Thank you very much! Buy a donkey! (That's Afrikaans lingo for those in Rio Linda.) Big Grin
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
None of my rifles seemed to care one iota! So I bought the cheaper FM215. Then I learned that they (the rifles) didn't care if I used the even cheaper CCI250s! So guess what, my cheap arse buys CCI250 primers now.

ASS_CLOWN
 
Posts: 1673 | Location: MANY DIFFERENT PLACES | Registered: 14 May 2004Reply With Quote
One Of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the input guys! Smiler
 
Posts: 2662 | Location: Oslo, in the naive land of socialist nepotism and corruption... | Registered: 10 May 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia