THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
H4831sc for 270
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I am getting ready to load up some shells for my new 270 (Browning A-bolt). From what I've read, H4831sc appears to be a good powder to start with. Does anybody have any experience with this? I will probably be loading Nosler Ballistic tips in either 130 or 150 grains.
Thanks.
 
Posts: 29 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 19 January 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Some of the best there is out there. Start with the 130gr bullets, 57gr of H-4831 and work up to the max in your rifle in 1/2 grain increments. Pick the most accurate load.


Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry any firearm. NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1652 | Location: Deer Park, Texas | Registered: 08 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Yep , Ive used H4831sc in my 270. R22 also
 
Posts: 4821 | Location: Idaho/North Mex. | Registered: 12 June 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Ol` Joe
posted Hide Post
Ditto GSP7.

I (my rifle) prefers R22.


------------------------------------
The trouble with the Internet is that it's replacing masturbation as a leisure activity. ~Patrick Murray


"Why shouldn`t truth be stranger then fiction?
Fiction after all has to make sense." (Samual Clemens)

"Saepe errans, numquam dubitans --Frequently in error, never in doubt".



 
Posts: 2535 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 20 January 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
60 grains of H-4831 with a 130 grain bullet is a "classic" load, but it is far too hot in my .270. Mine tops out at 58.5 grains and generates 3200 fps (24.4" barrel). Just a note of caution that you may need to stop before reaching the "maximum", depending on your particular rifle.

If there's a better powder for the .270 it is yet to be invented. But come to think of it, the Short Cut version IS a better powder due to its metering characteristics, so I guess a better powder has been invented! Big Grin
 
Posts: 13263 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
H4831SC,is the same powder as H4831 but it ic made in smaller cylinder shapes so it can flow through a powder measure and not get cut or caught up like the larger grained type.I use 58.grs for both,and this a good load,and you don,t have to reset your measure to reload both,if thats what you desire. van
 
Posts: 442 | Location: Idaho | Registered: 16 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The H4831SC is the same as H4831,but made smaller to flow through the ppowder measure easier. I use 58grs. for both 130,& 150 gr bullet. This way i don,t have to reset my powder measure when loading,and both are very good loads. van
 
Posts: 442 | Location: Idaho | Registered: 16 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Reloader
posted Hide Post
quote:
Some of the best there is out there. Start with the 130gr bullets, 57gr of H-4831 and work up to the max in your rifle in 1/2 grain increments. Pick the most accurate load.

Ditto

My current 270 tops out at 59-60 grains under 130 NBTs. I can get to 58 grns under HDy SPs. Both are devastating on whitetails.

Great powder choice for the 270!

I do get much better velocity with R22 but the accuracy isn't as good as H4831 in that particular rifle.

Good Luck

Reloader
 
Posts: 4146 | Location: North Louisiana | Registered: 18 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Slatts
posted Hide Post
I really like the H4831SC behind 150 grain bullets. I have a pet load somewhere for H4831 and the 150 Nosler Partition.

It's been my experience that H4350 works a little better behind 130 grainers. It produces great groups for me with 130gr TSXs.
 
Posts: 468 | Location: Tejas | Registered: 03 October 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
That's one of the best powders available for the .270 -- it works well for bullet weights from 130 to 150 grains.


"How's that whole 'hopey-changey' thing working out for ya?"
 
Posts: 5883 | Location: People's Republic of Maryland | Registered: 11 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks for all of the input guys! I'm excited to get started. I am loading up mainly for hunting (mule deer and elk). Since I have usually hunted these two during the same season I am kind of leaning toward the 150 grain bullet. I understand that the 130 grain would be plenty, if not perfect, for deer. I'm not sure about the elk, though. I know shot placement is key and nothing can substitute for that. Any input?
 
Posts: 29 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 19 January 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
I do NOT recommend the Btip in either wt for an elk.

All of the above advice is right on. My brother's first load on his new 270 was H4831SC, 57.0 grains AND 59.0 grains with a 130 Btip.

It is truly hard to argue against the various 4831s in a 270...in fact, I think the 2 are as good a match as any powder caliber combo you'll ever find.

Since you mentioned elk, however, I advise you consider some different bullets, and I'd stick with the 150 class if you plan on using leaded.


Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Split the difference and get some 140gr Nosler Partitions. 4831 is a classic 270Win powder. The SC version is easier to throw in a measure. 140gr Partition is a great bullet. Kudude
 
Posts: 1473 | Location: Tallahassee, Florida | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jan
posted Hide Post
WFG:
Yes, H 4831sc gives very good accuracy. The NBT is an excellent bullet, but if you prefer Noslers, you'd be better off with the AccuBond.
Even better for your intentions is the TSX 130-grainers, very accurate.
For your load development: consider the Audette method, go to: https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/2511043/m/571104925
Nice day,
Jan.
 
Posts: 113 | Location: Terschelling, the Netherlands | Registered: 19 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of TEANCUM
posted Hide Post
I've been using my 270, now my son's, for about 30 years with H4831. The H4831SC will allow for easier metering and should allow for more powder in a case. We have taken many large mule deer bucks and bull elk here in Idaho with the Nosler 130g BT. I have seen and used H4831 loads from 58 to 62 grains without high pressure signs depending on the cases used; getting 10-12 reloads per case with Winchester brass. Velocity has been above 3100 fps with a 22 inch barrel and the accuracy has been very acceptable for a Ruger (1" to 2"). There are a lot of people that are using R22 in this round and I would also be giving that powder a peek.
 
Posts: 1788 | Location: IDAHO | Registered: 12 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DrWatson69
posted Hide Post
1986 a-bolt hunter in 270win. 140gr ball tip and 140gr accubonds, fed 210primers, H4831SC at 58.0grs. oal at 3.350. both shoot less tan half inch groups and both bullets shoot at same point of impact. You can nosler accubonds factory seconds at nosler site look under shooters pro shop
 
Posts: 66 | Location: South Carolina | Registered: 08 February 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I used 4831, but found that H-414 or H-450 worked better
 
Posts: 257 | Location: The Greatest Country on Earth! | Registered: 04 October 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia