One of Us
| Some of the best there is out there. Start with the 130gr bullets, 57gr of H-4831 and work up to the max in your rifle in 1/2 grain increments. Pick the most accurate load.
Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry any firearm. NRA Benefactor
|
| Posts: 1652 | Location: Deer Park, Texas | Registered: 08 June 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Yep , Ive used H4831sc in my 270. R22 also |
| Posts: 4821 | Location: Idaho/North Mex. | Registered: 12 June 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Ditto GSP7. I (my rifle) prefers R22.
------------------------------------ The trouble with the Internet is that it's replacing masturbation as a leisure activity. ~Patrick Murray
"Why shouldn`t truth be stranger then fiction? Fiction after all has to make sense." (Samual Clemens)
"Saepe errans, numquam dubitans --Frequently in error, never in doubt".
|
| Posts: 2535 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 20 January 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| 60 grains of H-4831 with a 130 grain bullet is a "classic" load, but it is far too hot in my .270. Mine tops out at 58.5 grains and generates 3200 fps (24.4" barrel). Just a note of caution that you may need to stop before reaching the "maximum", depending on your particular rifle. If there's a better powder for the .270 it is yet to be invented. But come to think of it, the Short Cut version IS a better powder due to its metering characteristics, so I guess a better powder has been invented! |
| Posts: 13263 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| H4831SC,is the same powder as H4831 but it ic made in smaller cylinder shapes so it can flow through a powder measure and not get cut or caught up like the larger grained type.I use 58.grs for both,and this a good load,and you don,t have to reset your measure to reload both,if thats what you desire. van |
| Posts: 442 | Location: Idaho | Registered: 16 December 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| The H4831SC is the same as H4831,but made smaller to flow through the ppowder measure easier. I use 58grs. for both 130,& 150 gr bullet. This way i don,t have to reset my powder measure when loading,and both are very good loads. van |
| Posts: 442 | Location: Idaho | Registered: 16 December 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| quote: Some of the best there is out there. Start with the 130gr bullets, 57gr of H-4831 and work up to the max in your rifle in 1/2 grain increments. Pick the most accurate load.
Ditto My current 270 tops out at 59-60 grains under 130 NBTs. I can get to 58 grns under HDy SPs. Both are devastating on whitetails. Great powder choice for the 270! I do get much better velocity with R22 but the accuracy isn't as good as H4831 in that particular rifle. Good Luck Reloader |
| Posts: 4146 | Location: North Louisiana | Registered: 18 February 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| That's one of the best powders available for the .270 -- it works well for bullet weights from 130 to 150 grains.
"How's that whole 'hopey-changey' thing working out for ya?"
|
| Posts: 5883 | Location: People's Republic of Maryland | Registered: 11 March 2001 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Thanks for all of the input guys! I'm excited to get started. I am loading up mainly for hunting (mule deer and elk). Since I have usually hunted these two during the same season I am kind of leaning toward the 150 grain bullet. I understand that the 130 grain would be plenty, if not perfect, for deer. I'm not sure about the elk, though. I know shot placement is key and nothing can substitute for that. Any input? |
| Posts: 29 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 19 January 2007 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I do NOT recommend the Btip in either wt for an elk. All of the above advice is right on. My brother's first load on his new 270 was H4831SC, 57.0 grains AND 59.0 grains with a 130 Btip. It is truly hard to argue against the various 4831s in a 270...in fact, I think the 2 are as good a match as any powder caliber combo you'll ever find. Since you mentioned elk, however, I advise you consider some different bullets, and I'd stick with the 150 class if you plan on using leaded.
Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns
|
| |
One of Us
| Split the difference and get some 140gr Nosler Partitions. 4831 is a classic 270Win powder. The SC version is easier to throw in a measure. 140gr Partition is a great bullet. Kudude |
| Posts: 1473 | Location: Tallahassee, Florida | Registered: 04 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| |
| Posts: 113 | Location: Terschelling, the Netherlands | Registered: 19 January 2004 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I've been using my 270, now my son's, for about 30 years with H4831. The H4831SC will allow for easier metering and should allow for more powder in a case. We have taken many large mule deer bucks and bull elk here in Idaho with the Nosler 130g BT. I have seen and used H4831 loads from 58 to 62 grains without high pressure signs depending on the cases used; getting 10-12 reloads per case with Winchester brass. Velocity has been above 3100 fps with a 22 inch barrel and the accuracy has been very acceptable for a Ruger (1" to 2"). There are a lot of people that are using R22 in this round and I would also be giving that powder a peek. |
| |
One of Us
| I used 4831, but found that H-414 or H-450 worked better |
| Posts: 257 | Location: The Greatest Country on Earth! | Registered: 04 October 2006 |
IP
|
|