THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
For Ban: Blue Dot and 243 Range Report.
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Ban:

I received an email notification from you requesting info on Blue Dot and the 243 load data. I do not know if the "system" here is not working, or there is a fault in MY personal computer. However, I can not respond to the notification for some reason.

Therefore here is the attached report that I did last year. As always, work up carefully when approaching max loads.

Blue Dot Range Report; 243 Winchester

Rifle Used: Winchester Varmint

Barrel Length: 26 inches

Case Used: Remington New

Primer: Fed 210

Max: Capacity: 41.0 grains

Capacity Tested: 8 ( 20%) to 24 grains ( 60%)

1. Bullet : 55 grain Nosler Ballistic Tip OAL: 67.50 mm

8 grs: 1785 fps 13 grs: 2381 fps 18 grs: 2979 fps
9 grs: 1927 fps 14 grs: 2525 fps 19 grs: 3078 fps
10 grs: 2096 fps 15 grs: 2633 fps 20 grs: 3182 fps
11 grs: 2128 fps 16 grs: 2750 fps 21 grs: 3285 fps
12 grs: 2241 fps 17 grs: 2898 fps 22 grs: 3342 fps

23 grs: 3471 fps 24 grs: 3555 fps

Max Is recommended at 22 grains for reliable brass life.


2. Bullet: 60 grain Sierra Hollow Point OAL; 67.50 mm

8grs: 1675 fps 14grs: 2404 fps 20grs: 3047 fps
9grs: 1779 fps 15grs: 2526 fps 21grs: 3159 fps
10grs: 1869 fps 16grs: 2591 fps 22grs: 3227 fps
11 grs: 2018 fps 17grs: 2718 fps
12grs: 2167 fps 18grs: 2809 fps 23grs: 3286 fps
13 grs: 2305 fps 19grs: 2961 fps

Max is recommended at 22 grains for reliable brass life.

3. Bullet: 75 grain Hornady Hollow Point; OAL: 69.50 mm

8 grs: 1279 fps 13 grs: 2082 fps 18grs: 2604 fps
9grs: 1639 fps 14 grs: 2211 fps 19grs: 2704 fps
10grs: 1755 fps 15grs: 2280 fps 20grs: 2761 fps
11grs: 1882 fps 16grs: 2424 fps 21grs: 2798 fps
12grs: 1989 fps 17grs: 2499 fps 22grs: 2958 fps

75 grain Hornady Continued

23 grs: 3016 fps

Max is recommended at 22 grains for reliable brass life.



3. Bullet: 80 grain Winchester SP: OAL: 69.50 mm

8grs: 1340 fps 14grs: 2159 fps 20grs: 2725 fps
9grs: 1578 fps 15grs: 2265 fps 21grs: 2811 fps
10grs: 1696 fps 16grs: 2298 fps 22grs: 2826 fps
11grs: 1894 fps 17grs: 2462 fps 23grs: 2928 fps
12grs: 1928 fps 18grs: 2552 fps
13grs: 2069 fps 19grs: 2665 fps

Max is recommended at 20 grains for reliable brass life


4. Bullet: 87 grain Hornady SP: OAL: 69.60 mm

8grs: 1057 fps 14grs: 2026 fps 20grs: 2580 fps
9grs: 1434 fps 15grs: 2108 fps 21grs: 2652 fps
10grs: 1558 fps 16grs: 2226 fps 22grs: 2741 fps
11grs: 1683 fps 17grs: 2323 fps 23grs: 2782 fps
12grs: 1806 fps 18grs: 2415 fps
13grs: 1898 fps 19grs: 2487 fps

Max is recommended at 22 grains for reliable brass life.



5. Bullet: 95 grain Nosler Ballistic Tip: OAL: 70.50mm

10grs: 1520 fps 15grs: 2080 fps 20grs: 2514 fps
11grs: 1648 fps 16grs: 2159 fps 21grs: 2601 fps
12grs: 1757 fps 17grs: 2250 fps 22grs: 2693 fps
13grs: 1868 fps 18grs: 2295 fps 23grs: 2740 fps
14grs: 1974 fps 19grs: 2420 fps

Max is recommend at 22 grains for reliable brass life.



6. Bullet: 100 grain Hornady SP; OAL: 69.25 mm

11grs: 1575 fps 16grs: 2113 fps 21grs: 2512 fps
12grs: 1724 fps 17grs: 2207 fps 22grs: 2581 fps
13grs: 1828 fps 18grs: 2299 fps
14grs: 1927 fps 19grs: 2365 fps
15grs: 2019 fps 20grs: 2438 fps

Max is recommended at 21 grains for reliable brass life.


7. Bullet: 105 grain Speer SP; OAL: 70.50 mm

10grs: 1270 fps 16grs: 2050 fps 22grs: 2561 fps
11grs: 1521 fps 17grs: 2142 fps
12grs: 1668 fps 18grs: 2239 fps
13grs: 1757 fps 19grs; 2311 fps
14grs: 1837 fps 20grs: 2412 fps
15grs: 1928 fps 21grs: 2483 fps

Max is recommended at 22 grains for reliable brass life.



Conclusions:

1. I consider the 243 much more versatile for a first rifle using these loads than starting a younger shooter out on a 223 or 22/250. It will duplicate the other two rounds, plus has the ability to handle a heavier bullet while still giving mild recoil characteristics.
2. The 243 offers a wide variety of bullets from 55 grain to 105 grain for hunting, and even 107 and 115 grain bullets for long range target shooting and competition.
3. Some bullets that are lighter than other bullets reach max pressure signs at lower powder charges, than a few heavier bullets. This is caused by the load bearing surface of the bullet.

Observations:

1. Contrary to what is usually seen, or expected: In using trees about 8 inches in diameter as backstops, I noticed that in the 2200 to 2800 fps range, most of the varmint bullets were actually penetrating thru the trees completely. Since they are suppose to be fragile for varmint applications, I did not expect to see this. However It was observed in the 55 grain Ballistic Tip, the 60 grain Sierra Hollow Point and the 75 grain Hornady Hollow Point.
2. Therefore it is my PERSONAL conclusion that these bullets might be considered as potential bullets on deer sized game in parts of the country where deer only get to be Antelope sized animals.
3. If this is done, the results are strictly the responsibility of the handloader and shooter. IN the 2200 to 2800 fps range, the rear core is staying intact and not exploding like is advertised a varmint bullet should do. Over this speed the bullet is performing in the explosive manner as designed.
4. I got input from other shooters on an internet forum asking about their experience with this bullet, there were some successes, some failures, and many recommendations for a larger bullet. However, if someone desires to use these varmint style bullets, I advise testing them yourself and analyse your results before deciding to use them.

As always, work your loads up from a point long before listed maximum.

I hope that this information is useful in teaching new and young shooters how to shoot properly and safely. Recoil will be substantially less than typical factory loads. This should assist in accurate shot placement by the shooter.

Cheers and Good shooting

seafire
 
Posts: 16144 | Location: Southern Oregon USA | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
First off thanks for the work developing these I have tried a couple of different loads in my 243 Handi and I have been pleased with the results so far. Way more accurate than my tests with H4895 loaded low.

One question I have is case head expansion useable as a pressure indicator with these loads. The main reason I am asking is that I would like to try Blue dot in my 204 Handi, but I don't want to run too hot in the break open. A pierced primer in that action does not sound like a good thing.

Seeing on how close the 204 and the 223 are in case capacity I figure the data should be close as well. My on thought is how will the smaller bore diameter effect the pressure. As I see it that case head expansion is a conservative way of determining a practical max.
 
Posts: 32 | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
aulrich

As a guide, in cases of equal powder capacity, loads used in a 224 bore diameter would be similar to those in a 204 bore with bullets in 204 weighing 60% of those in 224.

In other words if the load in a 223 with 50 grain bullets is "whatever it is" then the approximately the same load would apply to a 30 grain bullet in a 223 necked to 204.

Mike
 
Posts: 7206 | Location: Sydney, Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Aulrich:

I bow to Mike 375 expertise,

Al I know is the smaller bore would cause higher pressures, with 223 data.

I would recommend working up. Of course the lower charges would not present a problem, but I would recommend working up slowly once you got near 10 grains of Blue dot or so.

I have no real reason to jump on the " trendiness " of the 204 Bandwagon. If I need that velocity, I have played with loads in a 223 with a 40 grains ballistic tip that will give me 4000 fps, and appears to give good case life, and I have not crossed the bridge or any pressure problems yet.

I have considered getting a 204 in New England Arms just to do some testing for load data. Then I would put another caliber's barrel on it tho.

If a 204 finds it way into my hands, I will definitely test it out and post the findings.

Cheers and Good shooting
seafire
 
Posts: 16144 | Location: Southern Oregon USA | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I have to admit to part of my decision of going 204 was the "new and sexy factor". But the other big factor was the 204 came with an extractor not an ejector. this should completely eliminate the stuck case problem handi's can be subject too. That and getting pinged in the forehead with empty cases.

I have paid the price for the new and sexy factor. There is no ammo where I live and they don't know when the next load will show up. Just yesterday I got 100 brass off of ebay delivered it was a little expensive but at least I got brass.

A couple of side factors were being able to see the hits in the scope and a little better for fur hunting. The ssing you hits does seem to be true but the fur load is up in the air. The winchester loads seem to be the ones but it is too early to say.
 
Posts: 32 | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Aulrich:

As far as seeing the bullet strikes in the scope, that is another reason I use Blue Dot in the 223s.
I get to see exactly that.

cheers
seafire
 
Posts: 16144 | Location: Southern Oregon USA | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia