THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Concentricity gauge ?'s
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I'm going to buy a concentricity gauge soon (like the next few days) and have narrowed to two choices. In no particular order I'm looking at the tool by NECO and the one from Sinclair. I know I can measure more than just runout with the NECO gauge but am not sure if I need that capability or not. Does anyone use one or the other? If you have any experiece with the NECO gauge do you use all of the features of the tool? Any feed back is appreciated
 
Posts: 1239 | Location: Golden, CO | Registered: 05 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of hivelosity
posted Hide Post
Dave, I will answer this way. DEPENDS? not the kind you wear.
The idea is load ammo as streight as possible. If you check the cases at each step of the process you will find a lot of variences.
case neck TIR before sizing and after.
Case neck wall thickness .
and bullet run out after seating.
Those are the things i look at when checking cases.
 
Posts: 2134 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 26 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have a guage I built and a NECO ($35 at a gun show!).

The NECO is most functional. My typical hand loads run .002 to .003 runout at neck or bullet. (Factory, including Hornady hand loads, runs .002 to .012 in a typical box of 20).

From all I've read/experienced getting down to .002 TIR is all that maters, finer doesn't help much.

Runout is the best way to measure - it is the total variation (and that's what counts). Neck thickness uniforming by outside neck turning helps, but is ONE of the sources of variation.


Tim K
(trk)
Cat whisperer
Chief of Smoke, Pulaski Coehorn Works & Winery
 
Posts: 621 | Location: Virginia mountains | Registered: 25 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have the Sinclair.
No complaints, but...

There is a tiny slip of paper [like from a fortune cookie] than comes in the box that says, ~ Your concentricity problems are probably caused by the expander ball.~

If you seat the bullet long and jam it into the lands, the front end of the bullet, at least, will be concentric with the bore. This may give a boost in starting pressure and so an increase in pressure, but will usually increase accuracy.

The fit between bullet and throat is ~.002" clearance, so the effect if eccentric ammo can only throw off the point of impact ~ 1 moa. So if your groups are so bad you could not see a 1" improvement at 100 yards, ammo concentricity is not your main problem.

All Forster or all Wilson seater dies will improve concentricity by .001", as will the sliding sleeve seaters from Redding or Hornady.

Getting rid of the combination "size the case and pull the expander ball through the neck" step will improve by .004".
 
Posts: 9043 | Location: on the rock | Registered: 16 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tnekkcc:
I have the Sinclair.
No complaints, but...

There is a tiny slip of paper [like from a fortune cookie] than comes in the box that says, ~ Your concentricity problems are probably caused by the expander ball.~


There is wisdom in this statement. Just pull the expander ball from your current set of dies and you might be suprised at the measurable difference. Many concentricity problems can be eliminated from careful F/L die adjustment.
 
Posts: 3889 | Registered: 12 May 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by buckshot:
quote:
Originally posted by tnekkcc:
I have the Sinclair.
No complaints, but...

There is a tiny slip of paper [like from a fortune cookie] than comes in the box that says, ~ Your concentricity problems are probably caused by the expander ball.~


There is wisdom in this statement. Just pull the expander ball from your current set of dies and you might be suprised at the measurable difference. Many concentricity problems can be eliminated from careful F/L die adjustment.


100% correct. There are lots of die "tuning" tricks, but I've started using a Redding body die/Lee collet die combination for loads that I want to squeeze the last bit of accuracy out of. It's amazing how much of a difference it makes when you take the expander ball out of the equation.
 
Posts: 321 | Registered: 15 October 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
DavidReed: I have been using the NECO Gauge for many years now. I like it. I recommend it.
I have used a couple other simple tools for strictly turning and testing the finished cartridge. I was not impressed with anything else I have used to buy one of them.
I have not used the Sinclair model though as yet.
Good luck with whichever you choose.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy
 
Posts: 3067 | Location: South West Montana | Registered: 20 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of covey16
posted Hide Post
I have used the Sinclair for about 4 years and am very pleased.

As far as improving concentricity without going to mandrels and bushing dies, use Forster sizing and Redding or Forster competition seaters.
RCBS dies haven't shown me a thing and Redding sizing dies have been hit or miss.

A good die in a good press will eliminate most of the expander button "problems".

Just one guy's opinion.

Covey16


Funny,After a rotten war like this,how hard it is to leave- Duncan Grinell-Milne
 
Posts: 4197 | Location: Sabine County,Texas | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia