THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
6.5 Swede vs 260 Rem
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of POP
posted
What are the ballistic differences between these two? I talking about handloaded ammo in new modern guns. (ie CZ etc). I do not care about factory loads at all. I have a feeling that the Swede can do better but all the handload data I have seen on it maxed out at 44K cup (for the older military stuff I guess).

Also if anyone has a CZ in the 6.5 Swede...How do you like it? How does it shoot?
 
Posts: 3865 | Location: Cheyenne, WYOMING, USA | Registered: 13 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Ol` Joe
posted Hide Post
I feel they`re both the same as far as performance. The Swede holds a couple of grains more powder but it only gets about 50-75fps more vel with 140s and lighter in my rifle. The extreem spreads have the velocities overlapping on some loads/powders. This is with loads I feel are max in my rifles. I don`t have pressure measuring equipment so how they stand as far as equal pressure loadings I`m not sure. I am sure though that what one will do the other will copy on game.
 
Posts: 2535 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 20 January 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of TCLouis
posted Hide Post
Personal opinion . . .
The 260 has an edge just because of the case head diameter which it shares with 30-06, 7X57, 308 and a bunch more.
Swede is a Fine cartridge though! [Smile]

LouisB
 
Posts: 4255 | Location: TN USA | Registered: 17 March 2002Reply With Quote
<green 788>
posted
The 6.5 x 55 Swedish Mauser cartridge is 108 years old and counting--yes, already a vetran when the 30-06 was still "wet behind the ears." [Smile]

Savage has discontinued the production of rifles in .260, an indication of slow sales.

I agree the two cartridges you ask about are pretty equal in handloads. With the heavier bullets (160's) you may find that the 6.5 x 55 has a more notable edge, much like the 30-06 has over the .308 with 180's and up.

I'd go with the Swede...

Dan Newberry
green 788
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Nothing wrong with the .260 Remington(6.5-08)but I don't think it can perform quite as well as a 6.5x55, although for some uses the shorter action length might be preferable.
 
Posts: 17099 | Location: Texas USA | Registered: 07 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of HunterJim
posted Hide Post
Pop,

I am with Dan N. on this one: for hunting go with the 6.5X55 over the .260 Rem.

I started my 6.5 career with a Swedish M94 6.5X55, and shot my first deer with it. Now a days my Western deer rifle is a 6.5-'06.

The standard twist for the 6.5X55 is one turn in 7.87" (200 mm), while the .260 Rem is one turn in 9" (as my 6.5-'06 is also). You can indeed use heavier bullets in the 6.5. The .260 Rem made its reputation as the wildcat 6.5-08 as a target cartridge where the slower twist was fine.

jim dodd
 
Posts: 4166 | Location: San Diego, CA USA | Registered: 14 November 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
about the same thing as trying to tell the diff in a 300 savage and a 308 winchester...

it's whatever you want, they are twins.... one might be redheaded and the other blonde, but a good pick either way....

(i'll be taking the redhead, of course)
jeffe
 
Posts: 39562 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Slingster
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by HunterJim:
The standard twist for the 6.5X55 is one turn in 7.87" (200 mm), while the .260 Rem is one turn in 9" (as my 6.5-'06 is also). You can indeed use heavier bullets in the 6.5. The .260 Rem made its reputation as the wildcat 6.5-08 as a target cartridge where the slower twist was fine.

Are there bullets heavier than 160 grains for the 6.5mm? I know that theoretically the 1:9 twist isn't supposed to stabilize the 160s, but at least one gun writer and I have found that the Model Seven does indeed stabilize them. My handload in the .260 of Hornady 160-grain RNs at 2350 fps out of the Model Seven's short barrel is accurate and duplicates the performance of the classic 6.5x54 M-S carbine.

If one wants to hot-rod the 6.5mm, then the Swede has more case capacity for that purpose, but for standard velocity loads, I don't think there's much practical difference between the two cartridges on game, and the .260 has the capability of fitting in a short action and of a standard case head dimension that permits switching calibers with ease within the .308-based family of cartridges.
 
Posts: 1079 | Location: San Francisco Bay Area | Registered: 26 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
They are close to equal in load books and factory ammo, but the Swede has surperior potential for handloaders.
 
Posts: 2249 | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia