THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Anyone got a Speer manual handy??
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I'm looking for an OAL for 44 mag w/ a Speer 240 gr FMJ silly-wet bullet, but can find no data for it. Would also like to know what they show for a max charge of 2400. Thanks for your help!
 
Posts: 72 | Registered: 20 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
From Speer #12 (15 years old), OAL for 240gr TMJ-Sil is 1.675. Max load for 2400 is 17.7gr, 1271fps. Uses a CCI magnum primer.


________________________
"Every country has the government it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre
 
Posts: 1184 | Registered: 21 April 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of waterrat
posted Hide Post
#13 shows 21 gr 2400 @ 1434fps


I tend to use more than enough gun
 
Posts: 1415 | Location: lake iliamna alaska | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the info guys, I appreciate it!

Guess I should have mentioned WLR primers. Was thinking around 21 gr of 2400 max, but wanted to make sure.
 
Posts: 72 | Registered: 20 February 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Ol` Joe
posted Hide Post
quote:
From Speer #12 (15 years old), OAL for 240gr TMJ-Sil is 1.675. Max load for 2400 is 17.7gr, 1271fps. Uses a CCI magnum primer.


quote:
#13 shows 21 gr 2400 @ 1434fps


A newer manual showing a higher powder charge? Blasphamy!
We all know they`re lawyered up and powder burn rates, bullet geometry, etc, today are the same as 20 yr ago.......

edited to add:
The Speer #12, the last year that specific bullet is listed in a Speer manual shows a max of 17.7gr with a OAL of 1.675". Newer manuals don`t list this bullet and the charge has went up for their 240gr bullets and the OAL has shrunk. Higher charges and shorter lenghts?
I tend to think the FMJ was the reason for the lighter charges in the older books. I`d be sure to work up... thumb


------------------------------------
The trouble with the Internet is that it's replacing masturbation as a leisure activity. ~Patrick Murray


"Why shouldn`t truth be stranger then fiction?
Fiction after all has to make sense." (Samual Clemens)

"Saepe errans, numquam dubitans --Frequently in error, never in doubt".



 
Posts: 2535 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 20 January 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Funny how things change . From the Speer # 9 shows a 240 grain jacketed soft point at 19.0 and at 19.5

350 CCI mag primer at 1272 1344 FPS respectively bullet shape is the only difference between those

loads. Now moving along to Speer # 11 ; A 240 grain whatever bullet Soft Point ,Mag HP, Magnum Soft point

or TMJ with a 350 CCI Mag primer with Max load of 22.2 grains of 2400 slipping along at 1452 FPS .

Powders an Burn rates have changed some what over the years as nothing is set in stone .

Work up and watch for pressures or I'll be forced to post a nasty looking revolver whose owner failed

to load correctly . Thankfully NO one was injured nor was it my revolver . archer archer archer
 
Posts: 4485 | Location: Planet Earth | Registered: 17 October 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Ah what the heck it's Christmas so enjoy the photos .

A mis loaded or overloaded S&W model 629 . OUCH !!!. Not so NIB any more Oh My . archer archer archer






 
Posts: 4485 | Location: Planet Earth | Registered: 17 October 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the input guys.

I had a person find my specific bullet (#4459) with a max charge of 21.0 gr of 2400 in the Speer #13 manual.

I normally load 21.0 gr 2400 behind 240 gr. Hornady XTP's and Rem JHP's and WLR primers with no pressure signs, and it's less than max according to most of my manuals. By the way, these will be shot in a Contender. I load 19.0-20.5 for the revolver, depending on target or hunting loads.

OUCH! That had to be one heck of an overload! Wrong powder or a double charge from the looks of it. I've seen split and cracked cylinders, but have never seen one with the top half gone.
 
Posts: 72 | Registered: 20 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Hey Doc, was that 629 clocked wrong, or did the cylinder rotate after detonation?
 
Posts: 72 | Registered: 20 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I can't say other than what was sent in an E mail to me .

Story goes a young fellow who was new to reloading had set the scale incorrectly.

It was Clays powder and to much of it . He along with his Dad an friends checked the scale and it was


set correctly according to the Son , Yet in reality it wasn't he was confused as to the correct scale

weight . Thus an Over charge is what did in that S&W 629 . If the story was correct then NO one was

injured and that's something to be thankful for !!!. Mighty Lucky individual !. archer
 
Posts: 4485 | Location: Planet Earth | Registered: 17 October 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Doc224/375:
It was Clays powder and to much of it.


Enough said. With Clays, case capacity will allow a 4x to 5x overcharge without spilling. Got to be extra careful with that low of case density. Glad to hear no one was hurt.
 
Posts: 72 | Registered: 20 February 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia