THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Not always as fast as advertized
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of thecanadian
posted
I had a pound of IMR4350 that needed using up, so I decided to work up a load for my 7mm-08 using swift scirocco's. I decided to do a ladder test, starting with 44gr. and working up to 46.2gr in increments of .2 grains. Groups really started tighten up near the end of the test. I went home and loaded up a bunch of rounds then headed back to the range. It seems that every time I go to the rifle range there's a million people there and I always feel rushed. I rarely get to shoot the way I want to, let alone have the opportunity to set up the chronograph. When I got back I was happy to have the range all to myself. I fired once, made the sight adjustment and shot 3 rounds. I was very happy with group. Swift had 46gr at 2721ft/sec as their max load. Mine were not quite up to that mark with 2653, 2667, and 2674.


"though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression."

---Thomas Jefferson
 
Posts: 1090 | Location: Eau Claire, WI | Registered: 20 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rapidrob
posted Hide Post
There are too many variables that effect a bullets velocity to hold a posted FPS as gospel.
Powder lot number
primer lot number
true bullet weight
bullet diameter
bore size
how the chamber was cut and to who's standards
bore cleanliness
air pressure
air,powder,barrel temperature
wind
accuracy of chronograph/sun placement/battery power.
Most of the powders tested are using freshly made powders and fired in a universal receiver type firearm in an inside range in ideal conditions using a barrel with an untold number of rounds fired through it.
While you probably will be within a few hundred feet of posted FPS.


Gulf of Tonkin Yacht Club
NRA Endowment Member
President NM MILSURPS
 
Posts: 448 | Location: Albuquerque | Registered: 28 March 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
Id call it darn close


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
A 50 t0 70 fps reduction is very close I have seen book velocities and actual velocities of over 200fps different .
 
Posts: 19621 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Barrel length as well.
 
Posts: 868 | Registered: 13 November 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
...and we haven't even ventured into chronograph accuracy and precision....

I find with Chrono's that consistency of SD and Range or ES is more important than velocity.

Technique is as important and the instrument.
 
Posts: 1082 | Location: MidWest USA  | Registered: 27 April 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
In many cases we tend to overthink such things. I guess that's part of the game, but the older I get the less I care about 100 FPS, as long as it shoots a decent group, and those half inch groups have become less important, and three shot groups get me home faster.. clap

What a relief! beer


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42176 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia