Both calibers are great. But I prefer the .444 because bullet weight are lighter than 45-70, and the shooting distance (for elk/deer) can be more far with a .444 than with 45-70.
Just my 0.02 cts.
Posts: 831 | Location: BELGIUM | Registered: 23 May 2002
I prefer the 45-70 because it retains more energy on the longer shot and years ago before I started reloading (and maybe now, havn't checked factory ammo in a while) the only factory ammo available for the 444 in my area was Remington loaded to 444 velocities using the same bullet they used for the 44Mag pistol. These were to devistating on deer for me and most likely would not have been very good for elk.
The 45/70 has a greater aray of bullets including a 250 gr Barnes X number which I have not tried. Also better hunting bullets available for the 45/70 as opposed to pistol bulets for the .444. Both are good but the 45/70 is better all round IMHO. We can't get them in Oz but you have the garret & buffalo bore loadings if you decide you want to hunt the big 5 in Africa
And lastly it has the factor.
Posts: 7505 | Location: Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002
.45-70 if you are buying new. .444 if you find a real deal on a used one.
The previous posters were right about the .44 mag pistol bullet being used, but there is/was ammo loaded with a 265 grainer especially designed for the cartridge. I think Hornady makes that one. Reloading, 300 grains is about the top practical weight.
Interestingly, 30 years ago, my hometown bought six of the Marlin .444s for the SWAT team and scoped them. The thinking was that they were plenty accurate at urban ranges, nothing hit within a 100 yards with the soft 240s would go anywhere but down, and overpenetration would not be a problem.
Can't speak for the 444 but I have a 45/70, and it's awsome, very accurate, with plaenty of knock down power. I roll my own, and you can load it up or down to you preference, for target shooting or any big game in North America.