Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
I have been browsing the little bit of published data there is for the 300WSM and was surprised to see that some call for the use of Mag primers and others standard. I would have thought it would be dtermined by the case capacity and the burn rate of the powder of choice. Is it that simple, if not what variables affect the choice? If we want to discuss one powder lets go with H4350. | ||
|
one of us |
For the most part I use mag primer in mag cases and std. primers in 06 size cases and std. primers always in the 9.3x64... As long as I get the accuracy and velocity, thats all that counts. Depends on the gun, they differ greatly in there likes and dislikes. ------------------ | |||
|
one of us |
ve found that Winchester WLR primers work well with the 6 powders I tried... ------------------ | |||
|
<.> |
I use mag primers almost exclusively in my handguns, but I use "bulkier" powders HS-6, H-110. I'm loading 38/357, 45, 44 magnum. All large cases, large bullets. Using one primer eliminates a variable. I use a standard primer in the rifles. I load 223 and 223 AI. Ball powders. Changing back and forth from one type of primer to another introduces a variable in the data. But I shoot in temperate climate and don't push the loads out to the ragged edge. | ||
one of us |
Thanks, all. I have some Big Game ready to roll with CCI-M and Fed 215Ms and some H4350 that will be touched off by the CCIs. I will try the H4350 with some Fed 210M s all this will be under 130 grain Barnes XLCs in Win. nickle 2.10" cases. I was curious though Steve/ricciardelli how did Varget/WLR combo do for you with projectiles 150 grains and under in weight? | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia