one of us
| I believe that only the Shiloh Sharps is stout enough for those loads. Pedersoli, for example, advises that 27,000 PSI is the max recommended for their rifles and I would imagine that is a good guideline to use, in general.
To wring the most accuracy out of a Sharps there is really nothing like blackpowder. I've tried smokeless and the results just aren't the same. Just doesn't "feel right" either. |
| Posts: 733 | Location: N. Illinois | Registered: 21 July 2002 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|
one of us
| Tap: When I had my C. Sharps .45-70 I used smokeless for moose hunting. My loads were all for cast bullets, never would I allow a jacketed, factory bullet to be fired thru my rifle - sacrilege. My loads were 47 gr.s of IMR-3031 with the RCBS 405 FNGC bullet and 43 grs. of IMR-3031 with the RCBS 520 gr paper patch. Yup! I used their .45 cal. PP bullet with smokeless. I fooled around a bit with different bullet hardness & for hunting, I wouldn't go harder than about 30:1 lead/tin. I fired up to about 52 grs. of 3031 with the flat nose bullet with no problems but accuracy fell off & recoil was more than I liked so I stuck with the 47 gr. charge. I'm not saying these loads are safe in your rifle, only that the above is what I did. I found I liked the large paper patch bullet for moose better than the flat nose. Seemed to give more penetration. Hope this helps. Bear in Fairbanks |
| Posts: 1544 | Location: Fairbanks, Ak., USA | Registered: 16 March 2002 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f43c/9f43cfbee273e5f910094f8ed81926fb9375812d" alt="Reply With Quote Reply With Quote"
IP
|
|