Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Does anyone have any information on the 224 BOZ as far as case dimensions and reloading data? If you have never heard of the round checkout the link below. http://www.civil-defence.org/products/ballistics/boz224/boz224.html | ||
|
one of us |
I remember reading an article on the 224 BOZ in a Guns&Ammo mag like 6 or 7 years ago. They were shooting though armoured helmets and vests with it. Not sure if it had load data though, I still got the magazine... | |||
|
<GunGeek> |
The following data is from AccuLoad ( AEM Enterprises ) Rim Diameter: 0.4250" Rim Length: 0.0500" Extractor Groove: 0.3430" Extractor Groove Length: 0.0920" Base Bevel: 0.1290" Base Diameter: 0.4250" Shoulder Diameter: 0.4250" Head to Shoulder Length: 0.6230" Neck Diameter: 0.2540" Head to Neck Length: 0.7580" Mouth Outside Diameter: 0.2540" Mouth Inside Diameter: 0.2240" Maximum Case Length: 0.9060" Minimum Case Length: 0.8960" Trimmed Case Length: 0.9010" Maximum Overall Length: 1.283" SAAMI Maximum Average Pressure: 37,500 psi Tell me the bullets you are interested in using and I will share suggested loads generated by AEM's latest version of LoadTech, which is now in beta testing (a very interesting load program that uses a unique mathematical model for each different powder, and doesn't use any of the old Powley stuff ... also does an excellent job with pistol cartridges). | ||
one of us |
GunGeek, Does that software happen to generate a dimensioned image of the cartridge? Can you post if it does. Also, do you have the shoulder angle? I don't have anything that fires this round...yet. One more thing on my TO DO list. I'll probably have a barrel made for my TC Encore before seeing about having an autoloader modified for this round. Talk about the ultimate Varmint handgun! I really wish they would hurry up and get this round over here in the States. It's only a matter of time though. It can't stay a military/police round forever. | |||
|
one of us |
jcsabolt-2, In the single shot pistol forum there is a dimensioned drawing of the .224 BOZ under a post of the same name. Sean | |||
|
<GunGeek> |
By the way, these figures are based on an overall cartridge length of 1.283" and barrel length of 14". | ||
one of us |
GunGeek, What no L'ilGun? Very interesting data, albeit untried... | |||
|
one of us |
I read something about the BOZ awhile back; I believe the author said ATF had deemed it to have "no sporting purpose" and that it would not be released in the civilian world. Dunno if that's true or not, and can't remember the name of the writer. BigIron | |||
|
one of us |
You might be referring to firearms but the cartridge is another matter entirely. One could simply neck down a 10mm and drive on. Call it the .224 Hornet rimless short or some such. | |||
|
<GunGeek> |
Hobie, Good question about Hodgdon Lil'Gun. I had the same question about Hodgdon H110. I asked the computer guru at AEM and here is the answer I got, as best as I understand it: The version of LoadTech that is currently being tested contains computer models for 112 powders from Accurate, ADI, Alliant, Hodgdon, IMR, Ramshot and VihtaVouri. When the product is released in the early fall it will contain about 175 powders, adding powders from Norma, Rex, Somchem, Thunderbird, Vectan and Winchester. According to them, the other load estimation programs use about a half dozen parameters, and base their estimates on a theoretical model, the same model for all powders. LoadTech bases its load estimates on up to 40 different parameters. They develop a completely unique model for each individual powder. The model for a single powder is based on an empirical analysis of up to 10,000 data elements. The models for the 112 powders currently in LoadTech were based on about 15 months of data analysis. Included with the estimates for each load is the confidence that the model has in it's estimate of the maximum load and the maximum velocity. The confidence (or accuracy of the estimates compared with actual load test results) is typically 98-99% or higher. If the confidence of the estimate for a particular load (based on the 40 parameters in the model for that powder) is less than about 95%, then LoadTech rejects the load. In the case of Hodgdon Lil'Gun and H110 with this particularly cartridge and combination of components, LoadTech just doesn't have enough confidence in it's estimates (based on comparisons with real life tests) to risk displaying a suggested load. It kind of makes sense to me. Does it make sense to you? | ||
one of us |
Here is an image.... | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia