What kind of difference can I expect when going from a standard large rifle primer(CCI) to a Bench Rest primer(CCI)? I loaded up some 22-250 loads, with the same powder/bullet combination that has worked excellent for me in the past, but instead of the standard primer I went with the bench rest primer. Can any one tell me what differences I will notice with this new combination? Thanks
Waaaaal, some folks will tell you its the straight road to Jerusalum but that was not what I found. I have tried both small rifle BR primers and LR BR primers in side by side comparisons. I could not find any difference! Not in side by side comparison nor mixed use. There just wasn't any difference that I could detect. The BR primers are supposed to be made by the most skilled, experienced employees and some folks are willing to pay extra for the "comfort" of having a premium product but I personally think its a blue gosling.
Posts: 2037 | Location: frametown west virginia usa | Registered: 14 October 2001
Benchrest primers are supposed to provide a more consistent ignition than the garden variety ones. I expect the difference in price is because the compound used took time and money to develop to its advanced state of reliability. I know as much about benchrest shooting as Bill Clinton knows about morality, but I do know that the key to successful benchrest shooting is consistency. Benchrest primers are so-called because they deliver such consistency.
Posts: 2758 | Location: Fernley, NV-- the center of the shootin', four-wheelin', ATVin' and dirt-bikin' universe | Registered: 28 May 2003
I am looking forward to giving them a try. I don't expect my rifles to go sub minute by changing primers, actually I don't know what the heck they will do, but I'll give em a shot. An extra buck won't break the bank...however it would be nice if some forward progress could be realized...
It just depends on the gun and the load. In some cases benchrest primers do not make any difference, for sure. In other cases they make an obvious change in performance.
I agree. I have one particular load in one rifle that groups much better with Fed 210M primers. Of course, if I changed something in the load, that may no longer be true.
Casey
Posts: 112 | Location: Western Slope of Colorado | Registered: 13 January 2004
I beleive that the match primers are sorted for more consistency in weight and size/height. In some benchrest circles,..the tools that seat primers are sensitive to .001" increments. A few years back some boys were all about having a .003" seating depth (supposed to be the best). The match primer can make seating these faster for the guys who use that theory. I use them because I shoot matches,...and every game animal represents an X-ring,..so I take no chances for the few extra $.
Posts: 1496 | Location: behind the crosshairs | Registered: 01 August 2002
Do it the el cheap way: sort your plain primers by weight. There is some credible evidence that suggests this will work. Come to think of it, segregate your match primers by weight, too. Can't hurt.
Posts: 305 | Location: Indian Territory | Registered: 21 April 2003
When I first decided to try BR Primers, I did some side by side comparisons with established loads. I did find that BR Primers made a noticable difference in the size of my groups. While some loads were improved more than others, I only buy the BR Federal primers for my small and large rifles cartridges. The price difference really isn't that much, compared to other components like powder, brass and bullets.
Posts: 8421 | Location: adamstown, pa | Registered: 16 December 2003
There's a good article, maybe last year some time, by McPherson, on this very subject in Precision Shooting magazine. Interestingly enough,(as I recall) he did dark room photography showing the explosion pattern and intensity of various types of primers.
As I recall, there was a large variation both in consistency of the event, and the actual output(explosion)of the primers across the board.
Reinforces my belief, once again, to NOT CHANGE ANYTHING when dealing with near maximum loads.
Posts: 1332 | Location: IN | Registered: 30 April 2004