Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Gentlemen, I need help. I have just ordered a CZ 6.5 X 55, it won't be in for a few weeks yet but I thought I would get a head start and get some rounds made up for it. I shall of course be trawling through this forum for load info, but I was wondering what would be the best brass to use, or better yet what to keep away from, with this round. I use Winchester for my 243 and Rem and Winchester for my Hornet, of the two I prefer Winchester. However It dawned on me that my old favourite might not be best suited for this round and I could maybe do better. All suggestions will be most welcome. John | ||
|
one of us |
Lapua. And I don�t expect any arguments.... Tron | |||
|
<eldeguello> |
Quote: None better. Norma is not bad, though. | ||
one of us |
If Lapua brass is available in the caliber, use that. You won't be disappointed with the quality. For 6.5x55, you have the added advantage that the Lapua brass in that caliber is less expensive than in other calibers. I just found out that Lapua apparently has stopped making .270 Win brass (which has otherwise been available over here, as opposed to in the US). I got the last 50 my dealer had in stock. Why is the world so unfair?? - mike | |||
|
one of us |
For most calibers I look for Lapua, and if not available I just get Winchester and if that is not available, I just get RP. But for 6.5x55mm brass, Winchester has a problem per my measurements: I made some measurements: Brass Win 6.5x55 case head: .471" S&B 6.5x55 case head: .473" NNY 6.5x55 case head: .477" Win 308 brass .464" Win Super brass 30-06 .465" Lake City 7.62x51 brass .469" Dies Lee 6.5x55 size die: .473" Krupp 6.5x55 size die: .480" Reamers at the Clymer reamer web site: 6.5x55 Swedish .4794" 6.5x55 Scan .4815" .308 Win .470" 308 Palma match .469" 7.62 Nato .4725" What does it all mean? Some vendors are using .471 case head brass for 6.5x55, and that ain't right! | |||
|
one of us |
There is no such animal as "best brass". If there were, the "best brass" would be any brass that you could buy 2,000 pieces of, all of the same lot number, at a reasonable price. I have found that most people who shout from the rooftops, "LAPUA", are the same as those soccer moms who drive Hummers...the only time they go "off-road" is when they are pulling into the Walmart parking lot, but they enjoy the looks they receive when they engage in this activity! Or even the Ferrari owner who has never gone past the posted speed limit. You really want to know who makes the "best"? Go to a 600-yard or 1000-yard competition and see what the real shooters are using. And besides, you can't load for a rifle that you don't have. How can you set-up cartridge dimensions without having the chamber dimensions? | |||
|
one of us |
Quote: Hey Steve, wasn't that a bit butch?? There are certainly shooting disciplines where the use of Lapua brass is the rule rather than the exception - hop over to benchrest.com and see what brass is mostly used by those guys. I can't really comment on the 600 or 1000 yds shoots - I have yet to attend one. In any event, I base my opinion on "best" brass on my own experience, which has been that Lapua brass exhibits exceptional dimensional tolerances - at least compared to other brass. The number of "reject" cases I choose to remove from a given batch, is very small compared to what I have to reject with other brands. Now, I must admit I don't outside neck turn, and I think it is fair to say, that given the right amount of work, other brass can be made to match (or exceed) Lapua in terms of dimensional integrity, you simply have to put more work into the brass. So although I don't drive either a Ferrari or a Hummer, I do still choose to use Lapua brass whenever I can and whenever my budget allows me to do so. I also use Winchester and Remington when they are economical alternatives - as a matter of fact, I'm cheap enough to pick up once fired RWS on the range - tsk, tsk! Quote: Fully agree, this might well be a tad early. But hey, we all suffer from "pre-toy exitement", and sometimes we need to live out our dreams . - mike | |||
|
one of us |
I don't see any point knocking the lapua. It is not that much more for this caliber, and metallurgically it is outstanding as well as tolerance wise. You take lapua cases and weigh them/measure wall thickness, and then compare to winchester, even norma.......And as for the BR competitors...DO look to see what they are using. Most of the time it is lapua..for good reason. For how long it lasts and for the fact tolerances are tight, you are spending little more on the lapua vs, anything else. A lot fewer headaches to boot. I have worked up excellent loads with winchester as well, but sorting did make a difference and who the heck wants to SPEND the time sorting. | |||
|
one of us |
I just purchased 100 new unprimed Hornady Frontier brass in 7.65 Argentine. As I was priming the new cases (WLR), I noticed that some felt tight going in and some felt like they had 10 hot loadings under their belt (loose). That didn't give me a very good feeling. Oh, I was using a hand held Lee priming tool. Is that something to worry about? Rojelio. | |||
|
one of us |
Butch? Well, as I check the current prices for Lapua brass against Remington, Federal and Winchester, this is what I find: .223 Remington - Lapua $39/100, Remington $14/100, Winchester $13/100 .243 Winchester - Lapua $39/100, Remington $21/100, Winchester $22/100 .308 Winchester - Lapua $33/100, Remington $22/100, Winchester $22/100 .30-06 Springfield - Lapua $45/100, Remington $22/100, Winchester $22/100 .300 Win. Magnum - Lapua $86/100, Remington $32/100, Winchester $32/100 As you can see, there is a difference in price. As for what remington brass can do: 5-shots at 200-yards. It was fired using a Ruger 77V in .22-250 Remington with Leupold 12x optics Case: Remington Primer: Remington 9-1/2 Powder: 38.4 grains of H-380 Bullet: Sierra 52 grain Hollow Point Boat Tail 5-shots at 200-yards. It was fired using a Ruger 77R in 6MM Remington with Leupold 9x optics Case: Remington Primer: Remington 9-1/2 Powder: 43.2 grains of IMR-4350 Bullet: Sierra 85 grain Hollow Point Boat Tail 5-shots at 200-yards It was fired using a Ruger 77R in .25-06 Remington with Leupold 10x optics Case: Remington Primer: Winchester WLR Powder: 52.5 grains of H-4831 Bullet: Sierra 120 grain Hollow Point Boat Tail 5-shots at 200-yards. It was fired using a Ruger 77R in 7mm Remington Magnum with Leupold 12x optics Case: Remington Primer: CCI-200 Powder: 64.6 grains of RL-22 Bullet: Sierra 168 grain Hollow Point Boat Tail | |||
|
one of us |
I've only used Lapua brass in my 6.5x55, so can't really compare within the cartridge per se, but it has sure held up superbly compared the the Winchester and R-P that I use in everything else--good enough that I will consider Lapua the next time I have to buy brass--for anything. A while back Nationwide Sports (that dates it) had once fired 6.5x55 Lapua brass for under $10 per 100. Unfortunately, I only bought 200. Oops! | |||
|
one of us |
Nice groups, Steve! I have to agree with you about the price difference between Lapua and Rem/Win brass - that is indisputable. Pity that. That is why I often end up with Rem or Win brass, although I'd probably rather buy the Lapua. Alas, such is the plight of the budget constrained shooter. Good news is, all is certainly not lost just because one has to use Winchester brass. - mike | |||
|
one of us |
Gentlemen Thank you for all your replies, as ever the opinions are clear well stated and forthright. I think I am going to go with Lapua, Why? Winchester 6.5x55 �34.50/100 Remmington 6.5x55 �32.50/100 Lapua 6.5x55 �28.75/100 Thank you all for your input John | |||
|
<eldeguello> |
It's always nice when you can get "the best for less" !! | ||
one of us |
Quote: I don�t even bother to be polite, you are obviously totally ignorant about reloading for the 6,5x55, the case dimensions, longevity of the cases in this calibre and the quality/price relation with Lapua cases. I have shot out at least one 6,5mm barrel and used it for all my hunting for five years, taking both deer and small game with it. The 6,5x55 is a universal "do it all" chambering where I live, in Norway, it is our "national cartridge" and its used for hunting everything from sparrow to moose, and for all high power competition. You do not impress a Norwegian with a brand name, people universaly agree that Norma and Lapua are the only real choices, the US manufacturers don�t even know the right dimensions and the german/austrian cases are heavy and expensive. Lapua are less expensive than Norma and of even better quality. As I stated before I did not expect any arguments, but I did not reckon with those who just enjoy having a different opinion, valid or not... Tron | |||
|
one of us |
Ooh, that is bound to liven up the discussion some - mike | |||
|
one of us |
No doubt excellent groups Steve. What steps do you take to prep your brass? Do you throw out the highs and the lows? I have to admit that well prepped brass can have better tolerances than any non-prepped brass, just takes time. | |||
|
one of us |
My case prep is very simple. I buy 2000 pieces of brass all from the same lot number. I run each and every one through a full-length sizer. I measure each case and then trim every case to the length of the shortest. I chamfer the inside and outside of the case mouth. I deburr the flash hole, inside and out. And that is it! After the first sizing I only neck size the brass, and then for only the first half of the neck. | |||
|
one of us |
I think Lapua is the best brass, but Norma, Winchester is excellent brass also...Most of todays brass is very good stuff.... | |||
|
one of us |
Totally ignorant? I don't think so. My experience in loading for the 6.5x55 can be found at http://stevespages.com/264_9.html And the brass I used was Remington because it was 1/2 the cost of Lapua and 1/3rd the cost of Norma. | |||
|
one of us |
Hey Steve, So you don't mess with actually measuring the wall thickness, weighing cases etc.? I have seen a slight difference when doing this but I want to know if it is worth all that time. | |||
|
one of us |
Quote: I still think so, Lapua can be found at a price matching any other manufacturer even in the US, in Scandinavia they are even less expensive of course. And the Lapua brass i a lot more consistent and last longer than any other brand I have tried in this calibre. I use Remington myself, in 7RM and .375 H&H, but not in the 6,5, where there is one obvious choice and no real contenders. I also think you would have to agree, if you bothered to try, that if you buy Lapua cases for the 6,5 you simply will not have to go trough the case prep steps you describe. I do the same with the US made cases I buy, but do not bother with scandinavian ones. Because of a thigt neck in my 7RM (fault, not purpose, but I live with it) I also turn necks, and just last night I turned a batch of rem brass, 50, to 0,014 inch neck wall thickness and found that some necks would clean up all around while some would hardly get skimmed a little on one side. This kind of uneven wall thickness, wich no doubt extends all the way down to the case head, I have only seen in US cases (not Hornady). I don�t think it means the world, but for really thigt groups you need to sort cases like that and throw away a bunch of them. In short, consistent cases like Lapua is, at the prices they go for, the least expensive way of getting really good cases. Tron | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia