THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Measuring groups
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
What is the proper method for measuring group size?
 
Posts: 71 | Location: Ocean Isle Beach NC | Registered: 28 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Frasier,

You may take a caliper (digital or analog) and measure the outside furthest points. Subtract the caliber and that reading is the grouping.

To wit: G = F - c
where:
G = grouping
F = Furthest points
c = caliber

Example:

At 100 yds with a 30-06 one shoots a group of 5 shots. The furthest point measures 1.25 inches. Your grouping therefore yields 0.942 inches. Enjoy!

------------------
Best regards,
Alex

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote! - Benjamin Franklin 1759

 
Posts: 902 | Location: USA | Registered: 01 March 2001Reply With Quote
<ultramag>
posted
Center to center of the furthest apart bullet holes is a little simpler way of saying it.

------------------
May your chambers be true to your bores.

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ricciardelli
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 3282 | Location: Saint Marie, Montana | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ultramag:
Center to center of the furthest apart bullet holes is a little simpler way of saying it.


Ultramag,

Is it indeed from center to center? I was operating under the premise that from outer to outer hole...

------------------
Best regards,
Alex

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote! - Benjamin Franklin 1759

 
Posts: 902 | Location: USA | Registered: 01 March 2001Reply With Quote
<Gary Rihn>
posted
Alex-

Your formula does indeed give you center-to-center. Your way of measuring is also correct. Ever try to find the "center" of a hole?

 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I just read steves pages [url above], and I learned something:

There are more meaningful ways to measure a group than the maximum spread.

 
Posts: 2249 | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
That is correct and that is the benchrest rules of measure. that is measure the two furtherest outside distances and subtract the caliber

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

 
Posts: 42136 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
That is correct and that is the benchrest rules of measure. Measure the two furtherest outside distances and subtract the caliber or use Rays method measure the two outside distances and divide by two, it'll make you feel good about your gun and after all thats whats important, whats in a silly millimeter.....

------------------
Ray Atkinson

ray@atkinsonhunting.com
atkinsonhunting.com

 
Posts: 42136 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
<Gary Rihn>
posted
If I shoot a five shot group, can I divide by 5?
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Gary Rihn:
If I shoot a five shot group, can I divide by 5?

Yes, but only if you use MatchKings...

Oops... Gotta go now!!

 
Posts: 1099 | Location: Apex, NC, US | Registered: 09 November 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia