THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Re: Kimber worth the money?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
mho,

The Kimber site says that NULA's Mel Forbes was brought on to assist ...........
www.kimberamerica.com/84m.php

I have read that they are made of Kevlar and carbon fibre.

I do not own one but I have handled a couple of them in stores. In the 84M the rifle is very light. I almost bought one a week ago but it was a 308 and I have so many .30's now. I made an offer and was refused as he said they were too hard to get. It was just an impulse on my part.
 
Posts: 5543 | Registered: 09 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks for that Savage! It is our StuC who is looking for one, but he needs a LH. I have sent him the link you posted, maybe he can figure out whether the LH Montanas are also available via that website...

- mike
 
Posts: 6653 | Location: Switzerland | Registered: 11 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm thinking about a Kimber 8400 classic, actually I've already ordered one. Anybody here have any experience with them? I'm aware of there reputation for fine handguns, so the question is:

Are they worth the money?
 
Posts: 189 | Location: Asheville NC | Registered: 24 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Well, I'm mounting a Nikon 2-7 Monarch as we speak on a new Montana in .260. There have been mixed posts about this gun around the web, but for better or worse, I've got one! Couldn't resist a 5 lb factory rifle with a 22" barrel! I'll tell ya' how it shoots! It's my first Kimber rifle. There were some reports of rough actions but mine seems just fine, and the trigger is like glass and I haven't even tinkered with it...
 
Posts: 648 | Location: Huskerville | Registered: 22 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I own 3 kimber rifles including a 8400 in 270 WSM. The simple answer in my humble opinion is AbsoFrigginLutely YES!
 
Posts: 3976 | Location: Oklahoma,USA | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
In the last six months I have bought two new Kimber 84M's. They have the features that I like including a baby Mauser action with a M70 wing safety, crisp trigger, match chamber and air gaged barrel, nice walnut stock, pillar bedding, glass bedding, free floating, Decelerator pad, light weight and made in the USA which is a nice feeling.

In April I am taking a ride down south. By the time I get done checking out the shops there may be a new 8400 in the car.

Are they worth it? To me they are for the reasons listed above. There are cheaper guns that may shoot about the same. I don't really care. I want something nice.
 
Posts: 5543 | Registered: 09 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

...Are they worth the money?




Hey simdow, Back a long time ago, which was actually the first time Kimber went into business, I got one of their Made In USA 22LR rifles. The Walnut on it was magnificent with lots of figure and color, checkering was top notch, the blueing looked so deep it appeared you could reach into it and the adjustable trigger on it didn't need a thing done to it. Absolutely beautiful "indoor" rifle.

Couldn't enjoy taking it to the woods because I was constantly concerned about getting even a single drop of water in between the wood and the barrel. When I'd take it to the Range, I always "had to" lay it on blankets so as not to accidentally scratch it. PITIFUL!!!

Just couldn't enjoy mine outside the house, so I swapped it off. Haven't held one of the Second Generation rifles, so I can't help you there. I'm just more of a Staniless & Synthetic user, but can certainly understand how people like the looks of the Blue & Wood rifles.
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Ol` Joe
posted Hide Post
One more "thumbs up" for the M84. They`re a lot of gun for the price.

Hot Core, I think I`ve seen that Kimber has heard the plastic and Stainless crowd and is now makeing rifles for them. I like, and own, rifles built of both and agree in some respects they make more sense. I never was accused of haveing much sense though, and at times form beats out function. This is one time I`d still go with the Blued steel and wood just because........
 
Posts: 2535 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 20 January 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

...I think I`ve seen that Kimber has heard the plastic and Stainless crowd and is now makeing rifles for them. ... This is one time I`d still go with the Blued steel and wood just because........




Hey Ol` Joe, Thanks for the info. I'll look for them the next time I'm in a Gun Shop.

I wish all you folks that prefer B&W the best of luck.

I just toted them too long in the mist, dew drops, drizzle, rain, downpours and frog stranglers. Come in wet, tired and want to climb in the shower, but there was the water soaked firearm needing immediate attention.

I remember sitting on Stand in a slight drizzle and watched a Blue Barrel begin to form surface rust even though it had 26 coats of car wax on it. It seems no one bothered to mention that DEET cuts through car wax almost as fast as a Democrat cuts through one of their Tax increases.

Then there are the 100+deg afternoons of my beloved Southeastern USA where for some reason us BIG fellows seem to put out a good bit of sweat. Come in wet, tired and want to climb in the shower, but there was the salt soaked firearm needing immediate attention.

And yes indeed the S&S firearms still need to be cleaned when exposed to those conditions. But they do allow me to get that shower first which I REALLY appreciate.

Still have no argument with you folks who prefer the B&W. It dawned on me a long time ago that what other folks hunt with doesn't require "my" attention when the hunt is over.
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Well, I'm mounting a Nikon 2-7 Monarch as we speak on a new Montana in .260.



Roger, does the "Montana" version come with a synthetic stock?? And if yes, is this the stock made by NULA?? I read an article in Rifle Shooter Mag, and it seemed to suggest as much. Montana = SS??
- mike
 
Posts: 6653 | Location: Switzerland | Registered: 11 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the responses, I don't know when mine will be here . The local shop says allocations are slow even for so called Master dealers.

Simdow
 
Posts: 189 | Location: Asheville NC | Registered: 24 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I wish they would come out with the 8400 in a 250-3000 Savage, man would that be sump'en....

I have not seen one as yet but the photos and the advertisment sure make me lust for one, expect I will have one before too much longer..probaly in a .308 that should about do it all....
 
Posts: 42309 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Mike,
Kimber has not produced a left hand model yet. Possibly in the near future.

Ray,
The M/8400 is the larger receiver for the WSM calibers. I would think the 250-3000 would probably be a better match in the smaller M/84. Personaly I would like to see the 358 Winchester in the M/84.

Good shooting,
Pete
 
Posts: 158 | Location: Danbury, CT 06810 USA | Registered: 25 March 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia