THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Pressure question
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
On Monday, October 5th I posted "A tip, useful or not" that discussed weighing loaded rounds. It was met with a lukewarm response. On Wednesday, October 7th I was shooting with a friend on his club range. He was shooting a 25-06. On his second shot, looking over his shoulder I saw his chrono register 3500+ fps. I told him to stop, which was unnecessary because the rifle locked up. I asked what he was shooting. It was 120 grain Partitions with 49 grains of IMR4350, a max book load in some manuals. We managed with some difficulty to remove the case. The extractor had bent the rim, and the primer was not to be found. He disassembled the remaining rounds and found most to be exactly 5 grains over 49. My conclusion was that he erred in setting his cheapo balance beam scale. He bought a new RCBS 505 the next day.

Fortunately, the rifle seems OK. Have not yet checked headspace.

Question: Can someone with Quickload determine the approximate pressure? I'm guessing it must have been at least 70,000, maybe 80,000.
 
Posts: 2827 | Location: Seattle, in the other Washington | Registered: 26 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grumulkin
posted Hide Post
I recently had an issue with an RCBS balance beam scale. I've been using it extensively for over 30 years so I've no complaints on durability. I also checked it with check weights on occasion and it was always right on.

Then came a recent experience with loading up some 308 Winchester cartridges. When I checked velocities, they were erratic. I then checked the scale. Sometimes it weighed accurately but most of the time the weight indicated was 1 or 2 grains LESS than it really was.

I guess the moral of the story is to check the scale more frequently.
 
Posts: 2911 | Location: Ohio, U.S.A. | Registered: 31 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
What can go wrong with a balance beam scale?
-Worn fulcrum
-Crud in the fulcrum
-Worn pivot/axle
-Operator error

I have a Lyman-Ohaus I've been using for over 30 years. I would guess it has weighed over 5000 rounds. Still perfect.

In this case, the scale probably has done less than 2000 rounds, and the error was very consistent. Consequently, I am going with operator error, due in part to a scale that is difficult to use accurately.
 
Posts: 2827 | Location: Seattle, in the other Washington | Registered: 26 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
Had a problem with My Redding balance some time in the past. Turned the air conditioner off and guess what?
old Clean your knife edge and jewel and keep them totally dry. Lube draws crude.

Eeker Always keep your scale covered when not in use. beer roger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Sam
posted Hide Post
Don't blame the cheapo scale for operator error. If it malfunctioned say it, if it was mistake he can own up to it. We've all made a mistake loading something that is why bullet pullers are made. I have a batch of .45ACP to pull from a sticky powder dispenser. Smaller batches and better QA would have prevented it. I've also had one rifle round with no powder loading on a single stage


A bad day at the range is better than a good day at work.
 
Posts: 1254 | Location: Norfolk, Va | Registered: 27 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Most scales operate on "operator repeatability", but they do require checking with accuracy weights from time to time..In some cases you find the screw loosens from dropping loads and allows the weight to change varying degrees as it slowly unwinds and sends a lower charge out, always lock the screw set up tight..I also suggest that when you set the powder measure with your scale that is balanced that you drop 7 loads to settle the powder in the hopper and if you don't throw a charge one after the other without a brake that with each break you toss a couple of loads and weigh them before you continue..If a powder measure sets too long say a minute or two it normally throws a heavier or lighter load than the set, so drop a few loads, return them to the hopper before you continue...

Scales and powder measures are overly sensitive and they the tend to become upset and pout if you don't pay attention to them. old


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42190 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Von Gruff
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bartsche:
Had a problem with My Redding balance some time in the past. Turned the air conditioner off and guess what?
old Clean your knife edge and jewel and keep them totally dry. Lube draws crude.

Eeker Always keep your scale covered when not in use. beer roger


Exactly, the scale should be covered when not in use and I take the pan and hanger off as well. Doing so, has kept my 505 in great shape since the 70's.
I used a digital for a (very) short time but didn't trust it the way I trust the 505 balance beam scale. Check and double check the setting against the desired load and they are reliable and accurate. Like most (well made) things it is operator error that is the danger.


Von Gruff.

http://www.vongruffknives.com/

Gen 12: 1-3

Exodus 20:1-17

Acts 4:10-12


 
Posts: 2693 | Location: South Otago New Zealand. | Registered: 08 February 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I check or calibrate my scale with a set check weights every time I use it...I don't want to make a mistake.
 
Posts: 3720 | Registered: 03 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Me 2 Ackley I U...and keep it's plastic cover on.

Temp, humidity, barometric pressure, wind blowing on the scale, bugs, going cross eyed, fatigue, mis-reading and missing a change in the settings(I've done all these baddies or not taken them into consideration and I'm NOT dissing or pointing fingers) can all mess with beam balances and digitals are NOT all that precise/accurate/repeatable either...read the fine print.

My Ohaus 1005 is at eye level and I glance at it every time I go into the room. I "zero" the scale after every reloading session so I can see at a glance any changes. When I doing load testing I check weight at the beginning and sometimes at the end to see if there were any changes that could cause the redazzzz.

Consistency in everything you do in reloading is the key to NOT causing a ruckus.

There is a change +/- almost every time I look...not much, maybe one or two tenths and you might not see it if you aren't looking for it.

Beam balances can get bumped and can jump 5 grains very easily and if you are working towards the top end of the pressure spectrum(WRONG) you can get problems quickly especially with the faster burning powders.

MOST problems in reloading can be traced to "operator error" in some manner, shape or form but hardly anyone wants to own up...if we did then we would all become better, safer reloaders.

Check often, don't get distracted...if I get visitors when I'm doing ANYTHING related to guns or reloading I send them to the kitchen for "coffee and donuts" until I get to a logical place to stop, then I become sociable again Mad Big Grin ...leave the palaver, smoking AND sundowners to AFTER reloading...check the powder level in the cases after charging or charge, inspect, then seat one at a time.

When I charge more than one case at a time I use a Redding powder measure, hold it in my left hand, set it down on top of the case, thump the charging handle a good rap at the TOP AND BOTTOM of the stroke and leave the handle at the bottom of the stroke while changing and progressing and use a baffle in the powder res, charge 5 cases then weigh the last one.

I can stay within one tenth gr pretty much all the time which is fine for tiny ratz out to as far as I can see them or for larger game even farther.

But for the most part anything above 20 cal gets the one-at-a-time treatment...that gives me time to do all the bench prep "stuff", inspect the case, note the number of reloading's, clean, etc, with MOST OPERATIONS done with the case chucked in a holder in a drill motor and taking a few seconds each to produce very accurate ammo.
 
Posts: 1211 | Registered: 25 January 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of dpcd
posted Hide Post
I wonder where the "OMG, I blew a primer; need to check the headspace" idea came from? Blowing a primer is not enough pressure to harm the rifle locking mechanism. Now, melt a case head, then call me.
 
Posts: 17360 | Location: USA | Registered: 02 August 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of The Dane
posted Hide Post
There is a major "problem" with weighing finished rounds and expecting to read variations in powder charge from it.

For education take 100 new rifle cases from a reputeable manufactor and weigh sort them.
Now there is a suprise no?

I once got a bag of 500pcs Winchester 22-250 and sorted them.
Cant remember much but i can say that the lightest case was 0,5gram~7.7grains below par and the heaviest one around 0,5gram~7.7grains to heavy. Now since i sized them the same the difference had to be on the inside and i took them to the range. I got @-20m/s~65fps on the light ones with bigger internal volume and @+25m/s~82fps on the heavy ones. Not much on a 1100m/s~3610fps load but way more than a good SD should be.

But what if you had a heavy case with a 5 grain to light load compared to a light case with 5 grains more powder, they weigh the same how would you sort beard from snot?
 
Posts: 1102 | Location: Denmark | Registered: 15 October 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
 Cartridge          : .25-06 Rem.
Bullet             : .257, 120, Nosler PART SP 35643
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.250 inch or 82.55 mm
Barrel Length      : 24.0 inch or 609.6 mm
Powder             : IMR 4350

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-20.0   78    43.20   2589    1786   38369  10144     95.7    1.436
-18.0   80    44.28   2647    1867   40849  10403     96.6    1.393
-16.0   82    45.36   2705    1950   43475  10648     97.3    1.352
-14.0   84    46.44   2763    2035   46255  10880     98.0    1.313
-12.0   86    47.52   2821    2120   49199  11096     98.6    1.276
-10.0   88    48.60   2878    2207   52316  11295     99.0    1.240
-08.0   90    49.68   2934    2294   55618  11477     99.4    1.205  ! Near Maximum !
-06.0   92    50.76   2991    2383   59116  11642     99.7    1.172  ! Near Maximum !
-04.0   94    51.84   3046    2472   62825  11787     99.9    1.140  ! Near Maximum !
-02.0   96    52.92   3101    2563   66757  11913    100.0    1.109  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+00.0   98    54.00   3156    2653   70930  12022    100.0    1.079  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.0  100    55.08   3210    2745   75360  12125    100.0    1.051  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0  101    56.16   3263    2837   80067  12224    100.0    1.023  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+06.0  103    57.24   3316    2929   85072  12321    100.0    0.997  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+08.0  105    58.32   3368    3023   90400  12413    100.0    0.971  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+10.0  107    59.40   3420    3117   96075  12502    100.0    0.946  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba     98    54.00   3251    2817   82196  11639    100.0    1.013  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba     98    54.00   3013    2419   59592  12230     98.1    1.167  ! Near Maximum !  
 
Posts: 1205 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 07 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
I use a check weight every time I set my scales for a new load.

One other thing that I do when I set my powder thrower, is to throw five loads into the pan and weigh it. A small error is magnified 5 times that way and is easier to see on a balance beam.


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12736 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I check weigh/calibrate my electronic scale before EVERY use. I no longer use a beam scale, as it would often go out of spec throughout a loading session. Before I start filling cases, I throw 10 loads and weigh them to average out any discrepencies, with my Redding 3BR, I can keep a +/- 1/10 gr average, a little more with my RCBS Uniflow.
I have blown primers in the heat of Summer in the past, nowadays, I do all load work up in Summer so I don't get any surprises.

Cheers. coffee
 
Posts: 683 | Location: N E Victoria, Australia. | Registered: 26 February 2009Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia