THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
pressure ???
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Up until now I have been full length re-sizing for my .300 win. I have run thru about all my brass, so now all the brass I have has been shot thru my rifle. I was going to try and just neck size the next loading. Do I have to drop a few grains of powder? Am I going to get different pressures with the brass being tighter in the chamber? If this doesn't have a positive effect on accuracy, I will go back to FL re sizing. Thanks Guys


Windage and elevation, Mrs. Langdon, windage and elevation...
 
Posts: 944 | Location: michigan | Registered: 16 December 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of duikerman
posted Hide Post
quote:
I was going to try and just neck size the next loading. Do I have to drop a few grains of powder?


In my opinion, NO
 
Posts: 770 | Location: colorado | Registered: 11 August 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Ol` Joe
posted Hide Post
The unsized brass acually gives you a "larger" chamber if you disreguard the brass in its fully expanded form. The load should be fine as is as long as it was safe in your FL sized cases. Sizeing isn`t an issue.


------------------------------------
The trouble with the Internet is that it's replacing masturbation as a leisure activity. ~Patrick Murray


"Why shouldn`t truth be stranger then fiction?
Fiction after all has to make sense." (Samual Clemens)

"Saepe errans, numquam dubitans --Frequently in error, never in doubt".



 
Posts: 2535 | Location: Michigan | Registered: 20 January 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks Guys. I was thinking that if the brass was tight in tighter in the chamber with less expansion room the pressures would be greater.


Windage and elevation, Mrs. Langdon, windage and elevation...
 
Posts: 944 | Location: michigan | Registered: 16 December 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of CDH
posted Hide Post
No, untimately all full pressure rifle loads (modern of course, no black powder here) expand the brass to fit the chamber...by neck sizing you are just leaving the brass at that fully expanded state. It is the ultimate volume of the combustion chamber that you are concerned with...and it's the same at the end whether you FL size or neck size the same piece of brass.


Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
 
Posts: 1780 | Location: South Texas, U. S. A. | Registered: 22 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
That makes perfectly good sense to me. I should have thought of it. Thanks


Windage and elevation, Mrs. Langdon, windage and elevation...
 
Posts: 944 | Location: michigan | Registered: 16 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You will just have 30-50 fps more velocity with the NS'd cases given all other aspects of the load are the same. Accuracy may improve also. The reason is it takes more energy to expand the FL sized cases than the NS'd ones. That energy comes from the expanding gas of the burning powder. Since that energgy is not used expanding the cases it pushes on the bullet. I've measured the effect many times with the chronograph using many different cartridges.

Larry Gibson
 
Posts: 1489 | Location: University Place, WA | Registered: 18 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I am hoping for the accuracy to improve, of course. Also I would think it would extend case life.


Windage and elevation, Mrs. Langdon, windage and elevation...
 
Posts: 944 | Location: michigan | Registered: 16 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of woods
posted Hide Post
CDH is right, the brass expands to near chamber size the first firing. New brass can be much smaller with a lot more headspace but once it is fired it is within .002" of being too tight in the chamber to cycle well. Each subsequent firing hardens the brass and reduces springback until usually by the 3rd or 4th you will have to push the shoulder back.

After you start pushing the shoulder back, it is best to have a gauge so you don't push it back so far that you are overworking the brass. I use the Stoney Point Head and Shoulders Gauge and push the shoulder back .0015" for Partial Full Length Resizing.

Maintains your accuracy and doesn't overwork the brass.


____________________________________
There are those who would misteach us that to stick in a rut is consistency - and a virtue, and that to climb out of the rut is inconsistency - and a vice.
- Mark Twain |

Chinese Proverb: When someone shares something of value with you and you benefit from it, you have a moral obligation to share it with others.

___________________________________
 
Posts: 2750 | Location: Houston, Tx | Registered: 17 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chain:
Up until now I have been full length re-sizing for my .300 win. I have run thru about all my brass, so now all the brass I have has been shot thru my rifle. I was going to try and just neck size the next loading. Do I have to drop a few grains of powder? Am I going to get different pressures with the brass being tighter in the chamber? If this doesn't have a positive effect on accuracy, I will go back to FL re sizing. Thanks Guys


No, you don't have to reduce the powder charge-if anything the fire-formed case will take a little MORE, but in any case, you sure can use the same charge.....


"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia