30 October 2005, 02:35
Matt NormanWin 760 = H414???
Did I read (here) that these two powders are one-in-the-same? If so, would load data be real close? (no, I am not the type that starts out with the max loaded listed and then add more)
30 October 2005, 02:38
Jay Gorskiquote:
Originally posted by Matt Norman:
Did I read (here) that these two powders are one-in-the-same? If so, would load data be real close? (no, I am not the type that starts out with the max loaded listed and then add more)
Yes and Yes. That's good that you work up. Jay
30 October 2005, 06:15
ricciardelliI beg to differ...
Over the years I have found the following generally true:
Faster
*169 H-414
170 N-150
171 S-361
172 AA-2700
*173 W-760
Slower
30 October 2005, 06:22
Jay Gorskiquote:
Originally posted by ricciardelli:
I beg to differ...
Over the years I have found the following generally true:
Faster
*169 H-414
170 N-150
171 S-361
172 AA-2700
*173 W-760
Slower
Steve, I've called Hodgdon a couple times on this subject, that it's just a lot# difference, and all they do is put the powder in different packages, made in the same factory, same with H110 and 296. Hodgdon# 1-800-622-4366. Jay
30 October 2005, 06:28
GrandpasezThe 414 I have gotten over the years is
identical to 760 I have gotten at same time.
We are talking from 93 to 98 when we did a whole bunch of testing.Ed..
30 October 2005, 09:21
ricciardelliDifferent lots of the same powder can vary up to +/- 5%.
31 October 2005, 00:32
El Deguelloquote:
Originally posted by Matt Norman:
Did I read (here) that these two powders are one-in-the-same? If so, would load data be real close? (no, I am not the type that starts out with the max loaded listed and then add more)
They are reportedly the same. If you always start low and work up loads, they are close enough, although they may not be identical in all lots.....