THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
405's in 454
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Lar45
posted
Hi I thought I'd start a new topic on this one from the blownup gun thread.
Pondercat, I was using win296 in my loads, win brass, and some 45-70 405's sized down to .452". I extrapolated some load data from published 300 and 350's, started 2gns below my guess and worked up from there. I didn't get sticky extraction until around 1400fps. The top loads that went 1550 were alittle stiff to extract and were definatly over pressure. None of the loads stabilized the bullets, I think this is due to the rifleing twist rate. I've heard that Ruger uses a different twist and will stabilize the 405's. The recoil at 1550 was stiff, but manageable with the porting.
 
Posts: 2924 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 23 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Lar,

I was reading your posts, as well as the others, on that subject. Very interesting.

I do not load my bull extremely hot. I load for a given point of impact at a given range, for competition. My hottest is usually a 250 @ 1450. Not too hot.

I have noticed some things:

I full-length size each time, and trim each time. I can get away with not trimming for one reload, but not for two. I tried partial sizingm, but that led to extraction problems.

Also, after about 8 reloads the primer pockets are history. But by that time I start getting splits on the mouth. I have one batch that made it through 9 reloads, the split mouth cases were thrown away. The primer pocket is so loose you could poke it in with your thumb. I use them for dummy rounds, etc.

All of this with starline brass. Longbob inherited all my win brass, and I have a set of 20 hornady's with 2 firings on them. I am saving them for a hot set of hunting rounds.

Just felt like adding this.
 
Posts: 1646 | Location: Euless, TX | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
<pondercat>
posted
Lars45 - I actually did about two hours of math to get my starting load and it turned out pretty close to my figures. What gave me 1326fps was Lil'gun. The same charge in H110 gave me 1250fps. So with you getting sticky extraction at 1400 maybe I'm right about where I should be with this load. As far as the bullet stabilizing I have no problems. Accuracy with most of the loads seems OK, but so far I've been restricted to 25 yards. Plan on going to 50 when I actually go test accuracy next time out.
The results that you got that you got with your revolver is probably pretty close to the same loads I was using in that Browning Hiwall. I had Brass failure beginning, starting at around 1700 fps.

ScottB - Maybe it is the Starline brass. I don't know if you read my post on the gun blowing up thread but I had a problem with Starline brass stretching as well. Problem was I didn't catch it until I had problems.

What do you think about that Lars45? I see that winchester brass is what you were using with your hot loads that didn't stretch. I could not duplicate my problems in the PUMA with Winchester brass. Wonder whats up. I have heard from another source(gun shop owner) that .454 brass doesn't hold up well for him after three firings of full power loads, and two if the loads are hotter. Wonder if he was using Starline as well. That don't figure though 'cause Starline has always been tops and my first choice. Seems like any of the brass should hold up well though, for moderate to low power load. PC

[ 12-28-2002, 08:06: Message edited by: pondercat ]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Lar45
posted Hide Post
the only real extreme pressure loads I've run through my Raging bull was with the 405's. Mostly I run 300 Lazer cast or 320LFN's around 1600. I've been working on the same win cases for the past year with no problems. I don't know what I'm doing wrong or right. I picked up some surplus powder and I'm about to start load workups with WC820. I thought I'd start with the 454 since it should have more of a pressure safety zone incase I start in the wrong place. I was going to order a bunch of Starline brass since I've only heard good things about it until now. I'll try and keep good records on number of reloads and case length. I'll probably search for max pressure and velocity for info with the powder. I think I'll order a hundred rounds of starline brass and see how the life compares with my winchester cases. It's interesting that you didn't run into problems in your Puma with win cases.
 
Posts: 2924 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: 23 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I've been using Starline lately, but Win before that which is still good just haven't used it for a while. I've only got 2 or 3 loads on the SL brass so far, have not had problems with either so far.

Pondercat, you don't have excessive headspace in that rifle do you? The cases were INDEED long, but that full head seperation looks classic.

I'm shootin 310gr hardcasts at an honest 1500fps out of my short RB. That's as fast as they get with 296 or H110. I have some Lil'Gun but haven't tried it yet, my brother shoots it sometimes in his 475LB but says it's dirty as hell.
 
Posts: 913 | Location: Palmer, Alaska | Registered: 15 June 2002Reply With Quote
<pondercat>
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Lar45:
...I was going to order a bunch of Starline brass since I've only heard good things about it until now...

I will not say that Starline brass is not as good or better than any other. I've used it a lot with hot .45LC, .44mag, 45-70, etc. and have only had good experienes with it. It is possible that I got hold of some of the earlier .454 brass from Starline, that may not have been hard enough. I found an article on case comparisons that alludes to that as well only for a different reason. I am still trying to figure this out. Until I do, it's moderate loads only thru that Puma. I have had no problems since that case head incident. Here is the link to that article. You may find it interesting reading.

http://www.sixgunner.com/mcpherson/454case.htm

Later, PC

[ 12-29-2002, 07:57: Message edited by: pondercat ]
 
Reply With Quote
<pondercat>
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Brent Moffitt:


...Pondercat, you don't have excessive headspace in that rifle do you? The cases were INDEED long, but that full head seperation looks classic...


Brent, As far as headspace goes, this rifle has only about 100 rounds thru it so far, and not very many of those full power, but that is still the first thing I considered. So I did the ol' plastigauge check. I needed something to compare with so I used my other guns. My Browning Hiwall in .454 measured .011, the Puma measured .0135, and my SRH measures .012. Bear in mind that this is just a plastigauge material and could be off a thousandth or two, but I think it is close. I'm still being nagged by the rough chamber. Here is my thinking. The chamber is quite rough. With full power loads the impressions in the brass are pretty deep. Now when the trigger is pulled and everything starts to happen the case is going to start it's backward journey into the bolt face. It's progress is slowed by the case walls expanding into the chamber walls. If the chamber walls are too rough it seems that it could significantly slow this rearward movement of the cartridge case more than it would otherwise. Now since the case walls will expand while the case head will not (or very, very, little) and the web can be stretched by that .001" or so. Subsequent firings will stretch it more and more until you have the oversize case that I experienced; pinch the mouth of the case, pressures go sky high and you know the rest. Of course the higher the pressure the more pronounced the problem. I think that at the lower pressures the bolt thrust is more normal and the problem does not exist to a noticable degree. Also it could be that the Winchester brass is harder than the Starline that I have, and is more resistant to the rough chamber walls. Now, does that make any sense at all? Well anyways that's one reason I'm cosidering polishing the chamber just a bit to see if things change. PC

[ 12-29-2002, 07:48: Message edited by: pondercat ]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I put 405 gr .458" bullets in Win 45 Colt brass with CCI200 primers and 40 gr of H110.
This was in a very beefy .410.
Don't try that in your revolver, its too long anyway. Even with a hammer, I could only get the OAL down to 2.6".
It shoots ok.
The .395" choke was ok.
The brass gets beat up from the poor chamber fit.
 
Posts: 2249 | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
<pondercat>
posted
So Clark. Did you really do that or are you just funnin' us. Were you trying to blow that gun up? Cripes, that's scary to think about. 40 grains would just about completely fill the case. So is your hammer press a Stanley or a Craftsman? I think the Craftsman 32 oz framing press is about the best. Puts a nice waffle pattern on the meplat too. [Big Grin] [Roll Eyes] [Big Grin]
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Yeah, I did that and allot more to that .410.
I did a stress analysis on a handi rifle 45/70, so when I saw the .410 was over built the same way, I got it for $50 for destructive test.
Looking at the notes, I can't tell if it was 2.6 or 2.1" that it pounded down to. The only thing that really hurt the gun was 45.5 gr H110 and 230 gr .452" Montana Gold FMJ split the .385" choke back to the front sight hole. The Silver bead was lost and the choke is now .395".
 
Posts: 2249 | Registered: 27 February 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia