Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
It looks like it would be great for load development at the range. How many own the 310 tool? what are your likes and dislikes about it? | ||
|
one of us |
I have reloaded lots of ammo with one years ago. I put mine away when I got my first press. Just to slow can't full length resize. It is just easier to use press and if you have a turret press it is a lot easier. I have three press set up one 7 hole turret that I use all the time the other two are there just for odd jobs once or twice a year. Haven't even thought about my 310 in a long time until I read your post. I guess it would work at the range no reason not to. But then my range is out the back door. | |||
|
one of us |
I have a Lee hand press for just that use. On the plus side it uses standard dies and can full length resize. On the minus it is bigger. | |||
|
one of us |
I have and use a number of the old hand tools. The Ideal (now Lyman) as well as the Bond and Newton (later Pak Tool) have the disadvantage of requiring a lot of die changes with a slow thread that had you screwing around all night changing dies. Now I use several at the range already set up to prime and to neck size and to seat bullets. I really like the Ideal priming chamber. Using the Ideal Quick Reference chart has given me insights into die switching when I do not have the specific die set. The nutcrackers are not a good choice if you do not really enjoy loading, but load only as an expedient to save money. Though I have Star and Dillon and RCBS and Lee and Jordan and Hall and Potter progressive presses, I see no reason for the press to have all the fun. I'm no longer in that much hurry. Cheers from Darkest California, Ross | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia