THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
What's wrong with Federal brass?
 Login/Join
 
new member
posted
Just received 500 cases of primed Federal brass. Just read in a former discussion where Federal is held in low esteem by Forum members. Why?
 
Posts: 54 | Registered: 22 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
How about sharing where you got the Federal brass? I have been trying to get some for my 7mm Rem Mag and everyone I've contacted says it isn't available. I (obviously) like it.


An old pilot, not a bold pilot, aka "the pig murdering fool"
 
Posts: 2905 | Registered: 14 October 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Some Federal .308 Win brass is a little soft in the head, reportedly. The practical upshot is that the guys that hotrod the .308 for target work stretch the heads too fast and it does not last under thost circumstances.


Geo.
 
Posts: 305 | Location: Indian Territory | Registered: 21 April 2003Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Bought the brass from Natchez. (30-06) Bought Federal because it was cheaper than all other brands and up to now I had not heard anything bad about it.
 
Posts: 54 | Registered: 22 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
I bought a box of Fed. GM 06 for my .338-06 & found it a bit soft for my use. Fine brass from the point of concistancy but primer pockest went way too fast compared to WW or Norma. Could have been a mediocre lot as well.


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
A few years ago I obtained a few hundred once fired 308 cases, Federal Gold Medal stuff. (once fired with the factory loading, that is) After full length sizing to get them to chamber in one of my 308 target rifles, I started priming them, and found that many of the primer pockets were horribly loose. So loose that some of the primers fell out under their own weight!

No, they weren't under-sized primers - the diameter of them miked correctly, and they fitted just fine in all my other cases in various calibres that needed standard, large-rifle primers.

I don't know if this is a common problem with Federal brass or not. It was the first time I had tried it, and it has been the last - so far, anyway.
 
Posts: 160 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 26 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My (limited) experience with Federal brass matches redrover's. New Federal Gold Medal .223 Rem brass had terribly loose primer pockets from the outset. Very disappointing given the price this stuff cost, and how limited supply of such cases are in Europe.
- mike


*********************
The rifle is a noble weapon... It entices its bearer into primeval forests, into mountains and deserts untenanted by man. - Horace Kephart
 
Posts: 6653 | Location: Switzerland | Registered: 11 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Chris Parkin
posted Hide Post
My experience is with .223 Federal brass, lots of the primer pockets were off centre so they went straight in the bin!
 
Posts: 63 | Location: Yorkshire, England | Registered: 24 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Ditto the primer pocket experience with 223. I've used Federal brass for thirty years and IMO it was among the best. It is disappointing to see this happen. FWIW, Federal as a company has changed hands.
 
Posts: 3889 | Registered: 12 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I too have had problems with FC brass in 223 and 308. However, I have had no problems with FC brass in 22-250, 257 Robt, 6.5x55, 7x57, or 35 Rem.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts: 118 | Location: New Brunswick | Registered: 03 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I use the 7mm rem mag brass from 1x fired fed prem ammo and mine reloads just fine. I like the fed brass. If you max it out, it will obviously eat pockets faster, but mine has been good for several loadings thus far.


Difficulty is inevitable
Misery is optional
 
Posts: 1496 | Location: behind the crosshairs | Registered: 01 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
Let me out it this way, I have fired some Lapau .243 that I have formed into .260ai. It has 11 firings & the pockets are still snug. Irun these near the top so? There is probably a reason Federal is no longer selling brass, maybe quality control? bewildered


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have not used Federal brass since the 1970s.

I am surprised to see (above) that many now think Federal brass is "too soft." I quite using it 30 years ago because back then I found it to be "too brittle." I would get 2 or 3 reloads from a case and then the neck would crack, so I quit using it!

Interesting how times change.

Barstooler.
 
Posts: 876 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 February 2004Reply With Quote
<9.3x62>
posted
I've used quite a bit of Federal brass for the 41, 44, and 45. It has lasted forever. I've also used in a anumber of rifle rounds, mostly the 8x57, and it has lasted very long. I have no complaints so far...
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Nothing is wrong with it in my admittedly limited experience. I've used it in 22-250, 30-06, 308, and maybe some others, and it was as good as any other brand.


"How's that whole 'hopey-changey' thing working out for ya?"
 
Posts: 5883 | Location: People's Republic of Maryland | Registered: 11 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
In my limited experience, 308 match, it has been fine, but then again I don't load to max.


Larry

"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading" -- Thomas Jefferson
 
Posts: 3942 | Location: Kansas USA | Registered: 04 February 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Buckshoot

Ditto the primer pocket experience with 223. I've used Federal brass for thirty years and IMO it was among the best. It is disappointing to see this happen. FWIW, Federal as a company has changed hands.


I also know of folks having problems with those same primer pockets being loose.
 
Posts: 1679 | Location: Renton, WA. | Registered: 16 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of TCLouis
posted Hide Post
I was at a range where a lot of 223 match ammo was fired one day. I went backl early the next day to scarf some up and someone was tere and had most of it policed up already. I mentioned that I was wanting some commercial brass to test in the TCUs and see if it made a difference. He haded me a few hundred Federal match case and I said I only needed a few. He insisted that I take them ALL (shoulda been a hint).
The second firing with mild (1200 fps) cast bullet loads and I had two separate in front of the web. Maybe it is good and accurate for the first firing because it is so soft!

I think the rest is in the scrap brass bucket.

Now I wonder about all of this 309 Match brass??

I have Federal once fired in 30-06 and it is very accurate (compared to Winchester in my two guns) and has performed normally so far.



Don't limit your challenges . . .
Challenge your limits


 
Posts: 4271 | Location: TN USA | Registered: 17 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of brent andrade
posted Hide Post
i like fed brass , but i too have found that because of the heavness of it it does build up more pressures cause of the lesser space internally , but thats why i use it to work up to my maximums , cause if it lasts and is safe in fed brass then i can load it in anything else and it will be safer still . i had rim expansion in fed 44 mags , but i was way out there with my loads , far enough i would never think about duplicateing them again even in a freedom arms ! but there has been some trouble with soft case heads , but like alot of lod wives tales some are true sometimes and most are just repeated malarkey ! this is true to an extent , just not in all calibers , nor with the newest stuff ive tried to get to expand the rims just to see how far id have to go , was 2 grains earlier than rps , but both were far in excess of the published maximums . heres to hopeing you got a good batch , and have lots of fun and no troubles with them ! if you do tho , please drop me a line as id like to try them and send a report in to shooting time about it ! thanks
 
Posts: 40 | Location: pennsylvania , usa. | Registered: 01 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I tried Federal 223 brass for some 7TCU loads, 2 or three firings and lost nearly all of them due to split necks.
I have a 22 rimfire bullet making die set, so I started measuring spent 22 cases with a ball mic. I found that the variance in wall thickness on Win, Rem and CCI were all .0007 or less while the Federal cases had up to .0015 of wall thickness variation.
I also spoke with a former ATK executive that told me that Federal Brass is not very good.

Between these three experiences I won't use Federal brass for anything.

Got hold of a bunch of Norma 223 cases that had flash holes waaaay off center so not real impressed there either.

Lapua is incredible brass, extremely well made and worth the price.
Just my humble observations.
Joe
 
Posts: 208 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 25 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of brainshot
posted Hide Post
I reload federal brass for my 22-250 and cannot find anything wrong with it. I also tried Remington and found them a pain in the ass compared with Federal
 
Posts: 79 | Location: Vienna, Austria, Europe | Registered: 06 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Ricochet
posted Hide Post
I've loaded a lot of Federal .30-06 brass, and never had any brass-related problems. As mentioned, the cases are smaller internally than some other brands. I was never able to get more than 57 grains of H4350 or H4350SC in it, whereas I've seen loading book loads going several grains above that. (Worked up in other brands of brass.)


"A cheerful heart is good medicine."
 
Posts: 1325 | Location: Bristol, Tennessee, USA | Registered: 24 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of NEJack
posted Hide Post
Bought a bunch of once fired Federal .223 brass. Have loaded about 300 of the 1000 so far (got the whole lot for $15), and usually thrown 1 in 10 out do to the primer hole being off center.

Haven't had that many problems, but I will go back to Win. or Rem. brass after I run out of Fed cases. They just seem poor quality.
 
Posts: 727 | Location: Eastern Iowa (NUTS!) | Registered: 29 March 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My wife brought home 60 rounds of NIB unfired/unprimed Federal .270s from a yard sale some time ago. (Well trained, isn't she?) They have been loaded three times wih rather moderate cast-bullet loads and are doing just fine.

On the other hand, I bought 500 Federal 7.62x39 once-fired cases from an Ebay seller and they are very inconsistent in neck thickness. After resizing in an RCBS die, a majority of the cases don't contact the expander at all, as they're being withdrawn from the die. A few make light contact, and a VERY few make what seems like about "normal" contact, judging by the friction. This indicates a LOT of variation.

For an AK, this might be allowable, but I'm trying to work up good cast loads in a Ruger 77, and I reckon it's time to look for something better.


Regards from BruceB (aka Bren Mk1)
 
Posts: 437 | Location: nevada | Registered: 01 March 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Federal Brass really stinks...

Just bag it all up.. PM Seafire for his mailing address and he will dispose of it for ya!

cheers
seafire
cheers
 
Posts: 16144 | Location: Southern Oregon USA | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I was given about 300 cases of once fired Federal Gold Medal Match 308 brass. I found that the brass weight fell distinctly into three weight groups. Each group was about five grains in bandwidth.

I loaded the stuff up for my longrange target shooting, which is at 600 yards and 1000 yards. My favorite load is a 190 Sierra Matchking with 42.0 grains of IMR 4064 with a Fed 210S or 210M primer. Depends if I have any of the expensive M primers.

This load is a maximum load on a hot day. Might be a maximum load on a cold day, but primers start to leak on the hot days. Well the Federal brass was very soft in the case head and after five reloads, I dumped the stuff. It shot well but the primer pockets opened up early.

I have also found this to be true for the .223 Federal Gold Medal match ammunition. I have picked up at least 1000 once fired cases left by the military teams at Perry. And the primer pockets open up too soon in my opinion.

I have had excellent service out of my Winchester brass, and of course, out of my old LC cases. But Federal, I won't buy the stuff, only use it if it is free. Won't last long enough to spend real money on it.
 
Posts: 1233 | Registered: 10 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Old Elk Hunter
posted Hide Post
I like Federal brass - I melt it down and cast
belt buckles with it. It is sad that Federal
doesn't fix their brass problems.


RELOAD - ITS FUN!
 
Posts: 1297 | Registered: 29 January 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia