Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
I have two .375s and they both seem to like this powder the best -- IMR or H., doesn't seem to matter. I have tried 4064, Re. 15 and several others, but none perform as good as 4350. With 260-grain Partitions, I load 81 grains for 2710 fps; with 300-grain A-Frames, I shoot 70 grains for 2525 fps. Accuracy is exceptional with both weights. I use a 24-inch drop tube for both loads to avoid compression. I seldom see folks use 4350 in their .375, so I am interested in seeing if anyone else likes this powder. Also, I find it interesting that the Swift Manual lists max loads considerably less for IMR 4350 than it does for H 4350, even though my rifles can't tell the difference -- velocity or pressure sign-wise. | ||
|
one of us |
I have a couple .375's and they're my favorite rifles. I also happen to be a pretty big fan of IMR 4350 but I can't get a decent marriage between the two. My best loads with the .375's have come from either 4064 (lighter bullets) or RL 15 (heavier bullets). Kyler | |||
|
one of us |
I have worked up loads for two different .375 H&H rifles now for friends on their way to Africa. One preferred Varget powder behind the 300 grain Swift A-Frame, the other preferred H 4350 behind the same bullet. Both shot amazingly small groups with this bullet with scopes of only 4 to 6 power. I actually would prefer the H 4350 load just for the load density. R Flowers | |||
|
one of us |
Sorry, I typed 70 grains with the 300-grain bullet. It should have read 79 grains. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia