THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Re: unbelievable shot with reloads!
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted
I've read very positive results on deer using Hornady's A-Max bullets as well......even Hornady don't recommend them but is aware of stories of success using them.
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Today i was hunting some strip mine land,where all there is is fields and mountains.i have a 270 win and my load is 57 gns of h 4831sc over a 135gn matchking(yes,MATCHking)
but anyways i seen a deer way over on the other side of the valley, which was 496 yds away! I dindt expect to even hit anywhere near it but figured id give it as try anyway so i aimed about 9 inches - 1 foot above him and surely enough he dropped!! he then got up and ran about 30 yards but fell for good,i got him through both lungs and both entry and exit wounds. I want to praise the matchking bullets they say not to use them for hunting but they are all i can ask for in a hunting bullet.
 
Posts: 54 | Registered: 24 May 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
any pictures?
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Kory
posted Hide Post
Quote:


I dindt expect to even hit anywhere near it but figured id give it as try anyway





If you didn't think you were going to hit him, why would you take this a chance on wounding an animal which would experience a slow, painful, inhumane death?

Kory
 
Posts: 860 | Location: Montana | Registered: 16 August 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I don't care if it was only 25 yds, if your not sure your going to get a good hit on it you shouldn't be shooting. You had horeshoes up your ass. People like you give us hunters a bad name.
 
Posts: 372 | Location: Alberta | Registered: 13 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Why would you take a chance on wounding an animal just for curiosity's sake? What would you have done if the deer didn't drop? This is poor judgment and gives hunters a bad name. Paul....
 
Posts: 323 | Location: Northeastern, PA | Registered: 21 June 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
"You had horeshoes up your ass." ..........I'm still ROFLMAO.

Next time get closer, take a more definitive shot and I'm not quite sure why you originally think that the shot was unbelievable.....do you question your loads as well.
 
Posts: 901 | Location: Denver, CO USA | Registered: 01 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm not impressed at all. Poor choice for bullet and for taking the shot. Bear in Fairbanks
 
Posts: 1544 | Location: Fairbanks, Ak., USA | Registered: 16 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It never ceases to amaze me why people use a target bullet for hunting purposes espically when there are so many good hunting bullets out there.
 
Posts: 76 | Location: Northwest Alberta, Canada | Registered: 05 October 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

It never ceases to amaze me why people use a target bullet for hunting purposes espically when there are so many good hunting bullets out there.




Because like the poster implies... the deer is just a damn target to him to satisfy a curiosity as to weather he may come close to hitting it.
 
Posts: 2045 | Location: West most midwestern town. | Registered: 13 June 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of JBabcock
posted Hide Post
blakeroth,

Are you the kind of guy that throws his empty beer can out the window when your done drinking it too?

It might be time for you to think about "hunters ethics." Why would you take a shot like that?
 
Posts: 611 | Registered: 18 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Dont patronize me.
 
Posts: 54 | Registered: 24 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Collins
posted Hide Post
Quote:

Dont patronize me.




They're not. They're chastising you. I think 90% of the hunters here pull the trigger only when they are sure of the kill. They are the ethical ones. If you're ever surprised to kill an animal you should be home reading a book.
 
Posts: 2327 | Location: The Sunny South! St. Augustine, FL | Registered: 29 May 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

If you're ever surprised to kill an animal you should be home reading a book.






Amen to that! Anyone who blasts away, just to see if he can hit a deer won't last long in our hunting camp.
 
Posts: 1416 | Location: Texas | Registered: 02 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I do find the shot somewhat unbelievable. I guess sometimes it's better to be lucky than good. I won't say that people should never take 500 yd shot, some people can successfully make them, but usually it's people who at least have an idea of trajectory.
Plugging you load into Sierra infinity's ballistic software using 57grs of 4831 and a 135 Matchking shows that with a 200 yard zero you would be 38" low at 500yds. Even if you had a 300 yard zero you would still be 28" low at 500yds. With a 200 yard zero and holding 9-12" over his back and you made a true trigger break you would have hit a foot beneath the deer. With a 300yd zero you would have likely been at least a couple inches beneath him.
How did you know the distance was 491yds? You either flinched high and got lucky enough to jerk into him or it wasn't really that far. Either way I agree with those who recommend that you do your target practice at a range and not on live game. After enough practice with a good laser you won't making "unbelievable" shots, you can make carefully calculated and practiced long ones..........DJ
 
Posts: 3976 | Location: Oklahoma,USA | Registered: 27 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
well,i measured it with my nikon laser 800,there could've possibly been a malfunction but it was a clear day so i dont think that was the case.Also, i only have a nikon 3-9 scope on it so i mightve been actually aiming higher than i thought.
thanks
 
Posts: 54 | Registered: 24 May 2004Reply With Quote
<eldeguello>
posted
The Matchking is the only bullet our resident gun guru, Steve Ricciardelli, uses for hunting. Me, I use the Nosler Partition in all calibers it's available for (because it always expands at lower velocities than any other bullet I know of, yet will never blow up!!), but will probably try the Accubonds too.



NOW: As to the shot itself. IF you have a rangefinder, or some other means of knowing the exact range to the deer, it is standing still, youi can see the whole animal, AND YOU KNOW THE TRAJECTORY OF THE RIFLE, YOU HAVE A STEADY REST, AND HAVE PRACTICED SUCH SHOTS, 500 yards is not too far for an ethical hunter. In my youth, I took several shots under such circumstances, and made good hits. But these were not wild, chancy propositions either!



Today, there is no way I'd shoot at anything much over 250 yards. I just haven't been practicing enough over the past several years, and no longer have confidence in my ability to do long-range shooting any more. And, the only really reliable way to know where a given rifle/load combination will shoot at such distances is by shooting!
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

... I dindt expect to even hit anywhere near it but figured id give it as try anyway ...


After sitting here looking at that "quote" for a couple of minutes, I'd say you shot your "credibility" in the head.

It will be difficult for anyone to forget or forgive the above, which indicates you have done absolutely "Zero" practice at distance and had no "confidence in the shot" at all.

I've mentioned before in other threads that I'm all for using any Hunting method a person chooses as long as it is legal. Due to your post, I will have to rethink how I need to properly word that.

I'm very glad you did not wound the Deer, but it certainly is something you should not consider as being a kill you can take pride in. I do hope you take the opportunity to learn from your egregious blunder and make an effort to become a Hunter we would all enjoy hunting with.
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

I'm very glad you did not wound the Deer, but it certainly is something you should not consider as being a kill you can take pride in. I do hope you take the opportunity to learn from your egregious blunder and make an effort to become a Hunter we would all enjoy hunting with.




I get the feeling you are thinking what I am thinking? blakeroth is a young hunter who was never taught ethics but may still have a chance. At least that is my hope!
 
Posts: 231 | Location: West Virginia | Registered: 22 December 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Congratulations on not losing your deer, and congratulations for starting up another ethics post and reply smorgasbord.
 
Posts: 46 | Registered: 28 October 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
How did you have your rifle sighted in?

I have made some very long shots like that even further in my mispent youth, but after having to follow some long and miserable tracking jobs, I gave it up and limit myself to 300 yards for the most part...

The problem with taking those long shots is a poor shot will usually miss other than dumb luck, but a really good shot will never miss but he sure as hell will wound the animal every time if he does not kill it...
 
Posts: 42190 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia