The Accurate Reloading Forums
First Chronograph - strange result

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/2511043/m/470101815

31 July 2006, 03:35
metalman29
First Chronograph - strange result
Rifle is a 24 inch barreled M700 in 30-06.

I was playing with loads of 180 Corelocks for cheap practice/deer ammo.

H4350 showed the best promise, so I was working up to book max of 57.5 grains.

Got my first chronograph last week, so trying it out with the loads.

57.0 grains ran at 2680 +/- 15 fps, No pressure signs. Best accuracy.

57.5 grains ran from 2610-2672 fps (only five shots). All but 1 was very close to 2620. No pressure signs. Groups opend up a bit from the 57.0 grain samples.

Thinking I had mislabeled the rounds, I repeated the test with Nosler partitions I had loaded previously. I go essentially the same results.

So, more powder = less velocity bewildered

I assume I was not burning all the powder in the barrel? Is there something else that could be wrong with my loads (neck tension, flash hole, etc..)??
31 July 2006, 04:14
wtb
not always,but many times when your velocity goes down with more powder you have about reached a max. level,a bit more powder than that will give a big spike in speed or worse.
31 July 2006, 07:46
jstevens
It is not likely that you have reached a max where the velocity is going down. Far more likely in my opinion, especially since you just started using the chronograph is that the first time, You may have had the chrony not completely flat which will make the distance between screens closer and velocities higher. Play around with it sometime and you'll find it takes very little to make a 100 fps change by accident. It's just a little thing you have to be very aware of, as you unfold it, then you end up moving it around several times to line it up with the target, etc. It also will change if the chrono is not lever, distance between screens is longer as you're shooting at an angle, therefore lower velocities. Setup is critical when the distance between screens is only a foot or so. Set it up very carefully and try it again and let me know what happens. Also bear in mind that if you're using a powder measure and 4350, it is very easy to have a half grain variation from shot to shot as it doesn't meter easily, so your .5 grain increase in powder charge is almost negligible, although it still shouldn't be 50-75 fps higher.


A shot not taken is always a miss
31 July 2006, 11:29
georgeld
Seems like we all have to go thru a relearning process the first time we try a chronograph out.

Do hope you didn't get a sorry Chrony.
IF you did, do two things before you use it again.

Replace those wire's with dowel's, dime stick will make four pcs. Shoot a wire and it's wrecked.

Get a pcs of plastic, glass etc adn cover the face so unburnt powder dont' eat hole's thru the membrane face.

Neither are covered by their worse than none warranty.

Wish you well,

George


"Gun Control is NOT about Guns'
"It's about Control!!"
Join the NRA today!"

LM: NRA, DAV,

George L. Dwight
31 July 2006, 23:49
jeffeosso
It's a decreasing returns point... if the powder is slow enough, you won't be burning it all, if it's quick, it's fixin to jump.

this is one of those "changes" I've mentioned before, where you add powder, it goes up fairly evenly, then CHANGES either up or down. Everyone has had this happen to them, if they do serious dev work.

switch powders if you don't like the 2680 laod?
jeffe


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
01 August 2006, 01:17
onefunzr2
quote:
So, more powder = less velocity???


Quite possible and not strange at all. But your progression only included 2 samples...57.0 and then 57.5...not enough to determine useful info. You need to load 5 or 6 loads, each increasing by .5 grain. You should see a proportionate increase in speed with each increase in powder. Known as statistical analysis. Your combination of components obviously topped out at the 57.0 mark. Working up with IMR4350 could yield different results. As could a different primer, or seating depth.
01 August 2006, 16:27
hawkins
Sometimes muzzle blast, particularly from slower powders, will alter the readings.
Step back another 10 feet and try again.
Good luck!