THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Reloading    Your approach to bullets without specific load data?

Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Your approach to bullets without specific load data?
 Login/Join
 
new member
posted
When reloading bullets without specific reload data, what is your method of determining a starting load?
I have some 158 grain Dardas LSWC Cast bullets in 38 Special (.358). After looking through all of my manuals as well as the powder manufacturers web site, as usual there is a great spread for starting loads. I am using Bullseye powder. Alliant states 3.5 grain (3.15 grain with the 10% reduction), and some of my manuals show 3.6 grains as a +P load. The lowest listed was 3.0 or 3.2 grains of Bullseye.

The bullet is exactly like the Laser-Cast bullets of the same specs, no data on those either.

What are your methods to determine a starting load?
 
Posts: 10 | Registered: 21 August 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Mossy, I would take into consideration the structure of the bullet - wad cutter or semi wad cutter or round nose - ie how many bearing surface does it have compared to other bullets. Then also the diametre would play a part. On .38Special I would start with the minimum load specifications and work up gradually.
 
Posts: 323 | Registered: 17 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
or just put 3.0 grs in the case and go shoot them.

compare the bullet you have to a picture of one in the maunal of the same weight/shape they are very close.

if you were asking about a 30-06 you would get a slightly different/same answer.
 
Posts: 5005 | Location: soda springs,id | Registered: 02 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of dpcd
posted Hide Post
I look at weight of the bullet only and can find loads for any weight made, or data close to it. Load and shoot. This method has worked for 45 years now. In case of differing manuals having different data; yes they do.
 
Posts: 17438 | Location: USA | Registered: 02 August 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I look at weight first style 2nd pick data from the middle of the bunch and work from their.
 
Posts: 19835 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
tu2+1
 
Posts: 4214 | Location: Southern Colorado | Registered: 09 October 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Have to agree. But, what if the powder is not listed for that bullet in any of the manuals- what do you do?
 
Posts: 253 | Location: Texas by way of NC, Indiana, Ark, LA, OKLA | Registered: 23 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
there is some data on line some where . do a little research on Yahoo
 
Posts: 1137 | Location: SouthCarolina | Registered: 07 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Lost Oki:
Have to agree. But, what if the powder is not listed for that bullet in any of the manuals- what do you do?


Yes, I agree with vines . . . search the web (I do), and it goes without saying that you need to be cautious.

I always test what I find on the web against the data on a burn-rate chart (like this) to see if there's a significant burn-rate discrepancy between the unspecified propellant I might want to use and a propellant specified by the manual whose burn-rate is closest to it. (Read the CAUTION statement at the top of the link's page!)

IF I decide to use my (manual-unspecified) propellant as a substitute for one of the manual's specified propellants, I proceed very, very cautiously, taking into account whether my substitute is faster- or slower-burning than the reference propellant.
 
Posts: 939 | Location: Grants Pass, OR | Registered: 24 September 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of graybird
posted Hide Post
Here is another option for making decisions.

Steve's Reloading Pages

Good luck!


Graybird

"Make no mistake, it's not revenge he's after ... it's the reckoning."
 
Posts: 3722 | Location: Okie in Falcon, CO | Registered: 01 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Blacktailer
posted Hide Post
OK cast bullets in a 38spl. With 158gr cast virtually anyone's data for a 38spl 158gr cast bullets will work. You are not going to run into any pressure issues because cast bullets need to be fired at lower velocities or you will lead the hell out of the barrel.
If the powder you want to use is not listed, look at the relative burn rate chart in most manuals and find a couple of powders that are faster and slower for which you have data and look at those loads. Now back off from the data for the listed loads 10% and load up a couple of shells. Shoot them and make sure there are no "issues".
Most cast bullet loads will be fairly mild "plinkers" although I used to shoot 180gr cast bullets in my 357 Maximium for competition but those were gas checked.


Have gun- Will travel
The value of a trophy is computed directly in terms of personal investment in its acquisition. Robert Ruark
 
Posts: 3831 | Location: Cave Creek, AZ | Registered: 09 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Compare it to something similar in 1/2 dozen books, start low and work up.
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BNagel
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Antelope Sniper:
Compare it to something similar in 1/2 dozen books, start low and work up.


There ya go.


_______________________


 
Posts: 4899 | Location: Bryan, Texas | Registered: 12 January 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading  Hop To Forums  Reloading    Your approach to bullets without specific load data?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia