THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Brass Question
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Burke
posted
At the range this morning,working on load refinement for deer season.Had 25 rounds of 25-06,100 gr Nosler Ballistic Tips,H4831sc,52.8 gr up to 53.2(previous testing showed 53 gr load a good place to start).Winchester LR primers,Winchester brass.At this point I should mention that previous testing was exactly the same except that I'd used Remington brass.At 53 grains,previous testing was fine.At my start load today,I experienced heavy bolt lift and cratered primer.The primer began to stop to crater as i got closer to my max load.Is the brass responsible for this? [Confused]
 
Posts: 111 | Location: Western Ky | Registered: 04 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
winchester brass is known to be less than remington in the powder capacity department,..therefore you reached higher pressures with the same powder charge. Back the charge down 1 1/2 grains and try working from there with the new brass. Less capacity necessitates less powder to reach the same pressure and velocity.
 
Posts: 1496 | Location: behind the crosshairs | Registered: 01 August 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bob338
posted Hide Post
quote:
winchester brass is known to be less than remington in the powder capacity department,..
This just isn't so. ALL brass varies, even in the same manufacturer. I've had far more capacity in Winchester cases, and Frontier which was made by Winchester, than in Remington. But I've also had the reverse. Those WW cases weighed LESS dry than the others, but dry weight isn't necessarily the best determinant of internal capacity.

It all boils down to the fact that in changing ANY component you should back off the load and work it up again. Another method would be to check the water capacity of the brass. If it's the same, then you have no problems. Bear in mind also that fired brass has a greater capacity than new in the same lot.
 
Posts: 1261 | Location: Placerville, CA, US of A | Registered: 07 January 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I should have started with a disclaimer,....
this is what I have found in my loads. [Wink]
 
Posts: 1496 | Location: behind the crosshairs | Registered: 01 August 2002Reply With Quote
<rg1>
posted
In your last sentence you said the cratering was going away as you approached your max load. I suspect that the Win case has more internal volume than the Remington resulting in somewhat less pressure. "Probably" the start charge you loaded in the Winchester case was a "very" mild load in that case. The primer could have been pushed out of its pocket hard against the firing pin since the fired case would be forward in the chamber with too little pressure to cause the case to expand and "grip" the chamber. I've found that often, not always, that Win cases have more internal volume, lighter and thinner, than Remington. Both are good cases but as has been said, you need to work up loads specifically for each case or component and not use the same data when switching components.
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I don't want to sound like a mother hen but it's a fact that there are capacity differences between Winchester and Remington cases that result from diffent thicknesses of the brass. The thicker the brass the less the capacity. Generally this won't amount to more than 1 or 1 1/2grs. so if you stay about 2 or 3 grains below max you'll probably never even notice it.
Best wishes.

Cal - Montreal
 
Posts: 1866 | Location: Montreal, Canada | Registered: 01 May 2003Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia