one of us
| Don't remember the chart exactly, but it probably showed that Lapua is the best, Federal gold medal is next with others following......DJ
....Remember that this is all supposed to be for fun!..................
|
| Posts: 3976 | Location: Oklahoma,USA | Registered: 27 February 2004 |
IP
|
|
new member
| Lapua was the best but I'm not sure where Federal was.I wish I could remember where I found it because it was very interesting. |
| Posts: 8 | Location: South Carolina | Registered: 27 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| by my experience, the best brass is Norma, with Sellier&Bellot being the worst.
just my 2c.
montero |
| Posts: 874 | Location: Madrid-Spain | Registered: 03 July 2000 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Lapua, RWS and Norma is all very good. Lapua quality appears to be dropping. The 243 I recently bought had pretty crooked necks. RWS is loadable out the box with no steps required, it's even chamfered. |
| |
One of Us
| could someone please tell me upon what tests and measurements we are making the judgemnt about "best". Who is doing the testing, and on what tests and specifications. I've heard so much about one brass being better than another and can't seem to find much difference myself. So I'd like to see some specifics please.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill
|
| Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003 |
IP
|
|
new member
| Consistency from case to case is the most important. Changes in case wall thickness will raise or lower capacity from load to load and irregularities in neck thickness will make for uneven bullet pull. This isnt important for hunting but it will make a big difference if you,re in to punching little holes. |
| Posts: 8 | Location: South Carolina | Registered: 27 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I have used Remington brass in 243, 280, and 30-06 for close to 15 years or so. I haven't had any problems but these are loads for hunting deer and not for matches. I still get loads to produce sub 1" at 100 yards and have had several sub 2" groups at 200 yards which is good enough for me. I guess I'm too easy to please. |
| Posts: 69 | Location: Havelock, NC USA | Registered: 17 September 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I can't help but think the Europeans have taken over this market for quality. I've had excellent results with Lapua in many different calibers. Not much point in weighing your brass with Lapua. It's very uniform in weight, and since the primer pockets are drilled instead of punched out the flash holes do not require reaming. Just one mans opinion. Best wishes. Cal - Montreal
Cal Sibley
|
| Posts: 1866 | Location: Montreal, Canada | Registered: 01 May 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I'm with Vapodog. I don't think there is any true "best" brass. I buy based on availability, and price. Most of the time that concensus leads me to Remington for rifle brass, and Starline for handgun. Bill T. |
| Posts: 1540 | Location: Glendale, Arizona | Registered: 27 December 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| FWIW among the things I've done in my life is some statistical process control and among the amazing finds is the consistancy of punching of holes. As a matter of fact its far more consistant to punch holes (where the process allows) than to drill them.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." Winston Churchill
|
| Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003 |
IP
|
|