one of us
| Differences between velocities published in loading manuals can easily differ over 100fps from those that you might see in your gun. |
| Posts: 3104 | Location: alberta,canada | Registered: 28 January 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I can't ever remember matching listed velocities with any of my handloads. |
| Posts: 309 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 31 December 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| I concur with the other two posts, i.e. "Actual results may vary".
To answer your muzzle brake question, you don't count the brake in your barrel length. |
| Posts: 852 | Location: Austin | Registered: 24 October 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| quote: I'm trying to think very hard, here
Be careful not to strain anything...... |
| Posts: 309 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 31 December 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| The velocity listed in the manual is EXACTLY the velocity obtained with the specified load, fired in the specified gun. The results with a load that replicates (as closely as possible) the load in the manual will always be somewhat different when fired in a different gun. Add to that the differences in lots of powder, capacity of brass, heat of primers, etc., then you have even more variance.
Some manuals use ordinary rifles for their velocity testing while others use universal receivers and SAAMI-standard chambers. A factory rifle chamber, even when barrel length is the same, tends to produce lower pressure and velocity than a SAAMI chamber simply because it is usually bigger, the larger capacity translating into a lower expansion ratio.
Do you need a faster burning powder with your 22" (effective) barrel? No. All of the powder will burned in the first few inches of barrel, so the velocity loss as compared to a longer barrel will not be particularly different with a faster powder; and as tests have shown time and again, the optimum powder burning speed for a given caliber is the same with any barrel of legal length. |
| Posts: 13261 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001 |
IP
|
|