THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Bullet construction in .404
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I used 400grn Hornady DGX bullets the past weekend, shot 3 Impala, in my opinion the construction of these bullets is to soft. I got exesive meat damage on two impala, they were shot inside 75 meters, the other on was shot at 125 meters, ranged afterwards, there meat brusing was aceptedle.
In my opinion the DGX is constructed at below 2000fps impact velocity.
Load was 2350fps at muzzle
 
Posts: 74 | Location: Vaal Triangle, Rep of South Afrika | Registered: 19 April 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of eagle27
posted Hide Post
As has oft been said on this forum, no need to load the .404 up to that sort of velocity level. This cartridge made its name with original velocities around MV 2100fps. At the ranges you shot your 3 impala MV 2100-2200fps would have done the job easily.
 
Posts: 3943 | Location: Rolleston, Christchurch, New Zealand | Registered: 03 August 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Rusty
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by eagle27:
As has oft been said on this forum, no need to load the .404 up to that sort of velocity level. This cartridge made its name with original velocities around MV 2100fps. At the ranges you shot your 3 impala MV 2100-2200fps would have done the job easily.


+1


Rusty
We Band of Brothers!
DRSS, NRA & SCI Life Member

"I am rejoiced at my fate. Do not be uneasy about me, for I am with my friends."
----- David Crockett in his last letter (to his children), January 9th, 1836
"I will never forsake Texas and her cause. I am her son." ----- Jose Antonio Navarro, from Mexican Prison in 1841
"for I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Arbroath April 6, 1320-“. . .It is not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.”
 
Posts: 9797 | Location: Missouri City, Texas | Registered: 21 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I agree with the above that the cartridge does the job at 2100 but believe heavier jackets will solve the problem you encountered and allow the 2400 fps to be used when "needed" to extend your POI for those longer shots. The heavier jacket will also reduce the explosive damage on lighter game.
I have been shooting heavy jacket (.065 and .049 vs. .030) bullets for a while now and although I have not used them to kill elephant or buffalo or an impala, based on wet clay banks and newspaper shooting the heavy jackets hold together well at the extreme velocity of up close testing as well as opening slightly at the slower velocities representing long range.
I recall Elmer Keith writing that he used solids on small game to eliminate the meat damage and the heavy jacket bullet will more closely mimic that affect than a soft.
I have to say, I have not measured the thickness of the DGX and might be way off but in comparing other "premium" bullets I have found some to be very thin skinned.
Frank
 
Posts: 6935 | Location: hydesville, ca. , USA | Registered: 17 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
At that impact vel, I would want an NF, Swift or Barnes. I haven't shot the Hornady, but the NF & Woodleigh work great @ 2250fps.


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia