one of us
| Quote:
Shooting larger animals, moose and elk for instance, at less than 250 yards the .30-06 with heavier bullets, 180 grain and up, is a fair bit better than the 7mm.
Yup, 7mm bullets top out at 175 grains, and I don't like the recoil from bigger bullets anyway. I like the smaller 140 grain Noslers. So far they've been enough, but I haven't shot anything bigger than a cow elk with them. My father likes 30-06 with 180 grain Remingtons, hasn't used anything else since middle 60s. |
| Posts: 14725 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| TJ3006 Don't give to much undeserved credit to the 7mmSTW. It took me almost a whole summer to find a load for my #1B (with a 26 inch barrel) which would come close to 3200 fps. My present load is a 160 Sierre SBT or 162 Hornady BTSP at 3185 fps. I have added more powder but the Chrony does not show the appropriate velocity increase. I agree that no game animal would know the difference between the 7mm at 3200 fps or a 30 cal 165 gr at 3000 fps. And it is just as easy to learn the trajectory curve for one as for the other. You would not believe how many arguments have occured over the lunch table at work about this very subject. Usually the argument is settled by bringing out the ballistics tables. I sold a very accurate 30-06 and bought the STW, not to kill game deader, but to cure boredom. I just needed a new gun for which to do load developement. |
| Posts: 273 | Location: West Central Idaho | Registered: 15 December 2002 |
IP
|
|
new member
| I shoot both, and I don't think there's a dimes worth of difference between them for "normal" hunting ranges of 200yds or so. The only time the 7mag has any real benefit is when you go past 300yds, and you're using heavy, high BC bullets loaded pretty warm. |
| Posts: 20 | Location: KY | Registered: 04 October 2004 |
IP
|
|