I tend to like the "classics" and disdain the new whiz bangy rounds like the ultra,ultra shorts, etc.

Have two .300 H&H's a sweet old pre 64Win 70 and a rebarreled Sako. Both shoot very well and have taken several deer and elk over the years. I can easily get 3000 fps with 180 NP's with good accuracy. Can't imagine needing more than that out of any thirty caliber.

FN in MT

The .300 H&H Magnum is it worth pursuing in todays short mag and ultra mag fever?

I have one and am building another. The short answer is yes, but only if you're a handloader. Factory loads are scarce and underpowered.

It may not be the most sensible option if you plan on shooting <180 grain bullets. If you plan to shoot 180's, 200's and 220's, it's a classy, traditional solution.

Brass is plentiful, the cartridge is easy to load and usually very accurate. You'll do more trimming than with some less-tapered cases, but I've never been put off by this.

Go for it.

It's a nice old cartridge that due to the ups and downs of world history survived and hunted in historic Africa and around the world. If you find a M70 or some other fine rifle so chambered then buy it at a fair price.



However if you really need a 300 magnum now then just buy one of the more popular ones. It seems that the 300 WSM is coming on very strong and there are a lot of 300 WM's and 300 Weatherby's out there already.



I wish I could get brass for a .30 Newton. That's the one that I admire from an historical point of view.

Just quickly, off the top of my head, you may be able to make .30 Newton brass from 9.3x64 Brenneke. If not, you could make it from re-formed .300 Win. brass by turning off the belts, forming in the Newton SEATING die and then trimming, fireforming and re-sizing, you may have to do this with a re-size in between. Some experimentation will be required, but, I,m pretty certain it would work.

May be a 300 win. short mag'--300 winchester mag'--or a 300 wby might be a more popular choice of caliber's. -Good Luck

I'm with ForrestB. If you reload there's no reason not to get a classic like the 300H&H.

Do you have a shot at a good deal, or just wondering if there's any sense to the H&H? I wouldn't be too worried about shooting the 150 or 165gr stuff though. With some experimentation you should still get an accurate load despite the big jump to the rifling.

If you need a 300 Mag and don't reload your best bet is the WinMag. Ammo is available widely, much cheaper than the Wby, it's accurate as hell...on and on.

Just personal opinion but I think for a 300 H&H to be chosen over 300 Win it needs to be in the right rifle or it is to partner a 375 H&H.

Mike

Like the original 375 H&H, everyone tries to improve on the already perfected rounds. The 300 H&H is a perfect all around caliber. With modern powders you can achieve nearly 300 Weatherby velocity or you can use lower charges and have the equivalent of a hot 30-06. Either way you have a winner.