Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Gents: I am appreciating advice on an ongoing vexing problem of mine. When reloading,bullet seating with the Forster precision bullet seating die,that allows seating to 0.001" tolerance,then measuring the OAL of the loaded round,I am getting about 10% that are significantly longer - maybe up to 0.07". Part of the problem being that I get slightly different OAL with the calipers,by rotating the round in the calipers,suggesting that the cartridge bases are not exactly level- maybe by 0.02" variation. This suggests to me that the seating die,seats from the ogive rather then the bullet tip- and bullet variation is responsible for the different OAL's? The questions that arise are: The resulting advise could be: 3:What about cartridge bases not being perfectly level,thereby yielding different OAL's measured and probably seated? bullets used:Nosler partitions,Barnes XLC Thanks for all advise sheephunter | ||
|
one of us |
quote:You have a good feel for the problem...bullets do vary in length thus will measure differently when seated with a good seater,such as your Forster,which does use the bullet ogive,or near it,to measure properly you will need a comparator such as the Sinclair or Stoney Point....uneven/level bases of the case can cause measurement variances...this is a bolt/or action problem if the brass has been fired.....that is why some people have bolt faces lapped/trued to be square to the bore,just keep the seater sleeve/mandrel clean and make sure that your bullet design doesn't touch the point of the bullet to the top of the seater mandrel and that will take care of the variances to the ogive and forget about measuring to the tip......good luck and good shooting!!! | |||
|
one of us |
Bigdaddy, I would like to very respectfully suggest that not all bullets vary in length. There are bullets available with ogives so precise that no variation in oal occurs even from batch to batch. | |||
|
one of us |
In the real world where reality takes precedents over theory the differences that you are dealing with are insignificant to say the least and I doubt that you can handle calipers to that kind of exactness..You might with a micrometer, maybe, but the question is Why?? Exactness is only for brain surgeons and lasers.... ------------------ | |||
|
one of us |
quote: Gerard/ We were not talking about bullet length measured to the ogive....but to the tip of the bullet, that is why I said get a Stoney Point or Sinclair comparator that measures to the ogive....I shoot BERGER BR bullets that are very precise measured to the ogive,If I was unclear, I'm sorry for any confusion,but OAL without specificing a comparator use means to the TIP of the bullet to the base of the case?????at least to the people I load and shoot with and articles I read!!!good luck and good shooting!!!! | |||
|
<sure-shot> |
I find this tool very helpful: 09-600 Sinclair Bullet Comparator $15.95 | ||
<goneballistic> |
quote:
| ||
one of us |
Bigdaddy, Sorry about being unclear in my statement. What I meant, and I know it is not what I said, was that if you seat some bullets to the same oal, the jump to the rifling will differ because the ogives are not the same. So if you set up to seat for precisely the same bullet jump, the oals will differ. If, however, the bullets are 100% identical in nose shape and ogive shape, then seating them either way will result in the same oal on every cartridge and the same jump with every cartridge. ------------------ | |||
|
one of us |
Thanks for the responses to clarify for the "hunter-user" is their experience/knowledge as to "the best" bullet seating.Given the variance in bullet shapes and maybe cartridge bases. It appears seating depth differences make a lot of difference in the MOA,judging from reports on this forum.My interpretation would be this to be a result of finding the "best bullet jump" for the barrel etc.
| |||
|
<goneballistic> |
sheephunter, .07", if that's what you meant, is quite a variation. I have one rifle, a Savage Model 10FLP that has a "sweet spot" bullet jump of .003". As someone pointed out OAL, as measured from bullet tip, is unreliable. OAL should be measured with a comparator. Likewise, the bullet seater should contact the bullet ogive, not the tip. The bullet tip, as a point of reference, would give a variation in seating depths and bullet jump. The tip of the projectile is usually where you get the most variation in that projectile. This is the reason that most Match rifle projectiles are Hollow Points. The hollow point, (jacket) weighs next to nothing, when compared with the overall projectile weight. So you do not have those seemingly inherent tip variations throwing off your match bullet's balance, like a solid tip would. As to your case head variations, do you lube well? A semi-stuck case in your sizing die can cause the case head to be pulled out of shape on the ram downstroke. Either that, or you need different cases. My suggestion: Go to this website and glean whatever you can use. http://www.cctrap.com/~varmint/arelo.htm Then, cut loose with $25 and get a comparator set. A Stoney OAL gauge setup also helps, but there are several methods to set bullet jump without it. Good shooting! [This message has been edited by David M (edited 11-23-2001).] | ||
one of us |
Thanks David, you are getting close to my actual question: Do I need a Stoney Ogive comparator gauge to seat bullets accurately? Assuming that I use the Ultra Forstner bullet seater,which I believe seats them from the ogive anyway. Putting it another way:My rounds maybe alright,its only the measuring variance to OAL that causes my concern. Putting it yet another way:If one seats c a precision bullet seating die,should one verify reproducible seating depth,distance to rifling? thanks | |||
|
<goneballistic> |
quote: [This message has been edited by David M (edited 11-23-2001).] | ||
<sure-shot> |
Sheephtr, you are going to need a reference(OAL) for your load development and future loadings. Once you decide on an ideal OAL, you will want to record that measurement. So yes you should purchase a comparator tool. This will help you in the future, you can also make up one dummy round(less powder& primer) for future seating depths. Hope this helps. sure-shot | ||
<perrydog> |
I think you should go shoot the things and see how how big of holes they make in paper! If your seating die really is seating them by the ogive, I would think that the added consistency should give you some improvement in accuracy. I would also try seating some with another die(if one is available) and see if maybe your brass is the culprit. I think this gives you a great excuse to buy some stoney point products ...and any excuse to buy some more tools is valid(needed them, might need them in the future, they were on sale, they looked neat, everybody else have some, etc.) Phil | ||
one of us |
Thanks, youall,it is heartwarming to get soo much advise on a simple problem.You pretty much convinced me to abandon my cheap ways of verifying correct seating with a caliper to OAL.I am in the market for a comparator to record length to the ogive henceforce. I will then have another number to play with and sound intelligent sheephunter | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia