One of Us
| |
| Posts: 250 | Location: North Dakota | Registered: 06 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Ok, I guess the link isn't going to work. When you get to the Sierra mainpage, click on Matchking under the "Bullets by brand" header. It will be about half way down. By the way, they list a BC of .570 for speeds of 2800+ FPS -not even close to .615
SBB |
| Posts: 250 | Location: North Dakota | Registered: 06 January 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Last time I talked to Sierra - was informed they no longer produce the 155 Matchking. Don't know why it is still on the web site. Either I was lied to - or they haven't updated site.
If a day goes by when you don't learn something - it was a Total Loss!
|
| Posts: 324 | Location: SE Wyoming | Registered: 27 January 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Published ballistic coefficients for bullets are a lot like the published eye relief and field of view for scopes, or published muzzle velocities for factory ammunition; that is, they are closer to what the manufacturer believes will help sell the products than they are perhaps to the product's actual performance.
Ballistic coefficients do vary with velocity (and with atmospheric conditions). The only way to dependably compare the ballistic coefficient of two similar bullets is to actually shoot them under controlled conditions and compare their trajectories (and this is not as easy as it sounds).
Anecdotal evidence from the field indicates that the polymer-tipped bullets (Ballistic Tips, Blitzkings, etc.) have even less wind resistance than calculated, and that hollow points tend not to be quite as "slick" as the published figures indicate. But your "mileage" can, and assuredly will, vary. The differences we're talking about are only inch-fractions at several hundred yards, anyway. |
| Posts: 13263 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001 |
IP
|
|