THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
H 4831 / IMR 4831 ???
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Leo M
posted
If you didn't have either powrer and were going to develope a 270 Winchester load, which would you buy first? Thanks. thumb
 
Posts: 188 | Location: New Brunswick, Canada | Registered: 25 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
actually I'd go for H4350
IMR 4831 is about 10% faster than H4831 according to people more knowlegable than me hope this helps
 
Posts: 249 | Location: Australia | Registered: 13 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
I always used 55 grs IMR4350 in my 270 and 130grs. Four different rifles all shot submoa. Loadtech shows a higher velocity with IMR 4831 vs H4831


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
FWIW, it seems I always have gotten slightly better accuracy from the IMR versions, and therefore always used them as my first choice. But now that Hodgdon owns IMR, they might just be the same powder. Hodgdon doesn't make, and has never made their own powder. Maybe we've been buying IMR in Hodgdon packaging all along and just didn't know it. Wink
 
Posts: 8169 | Location: humboldt | Registered: 10 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Croberts
posted Hide Post
A little tid bit of info that may help, my savage 270 loved H1000 with 130 gr Nosler B-tips. For a sporter rifle it shot .6 inch 5 shot groups. Fluke?? not real sure but it liked it.


A man should never stop learning, so a man should never stop asking questions.


A man should never stop learning, so a man should never stop asking questions
 
Posts: 164 | Location: Abingdon Va. | Registered: 09 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
What load of 1000?


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
H4350 H4831SC H4895 and varget to name a few are made in Australia by ADI these are great powders

quote:
Originally posted by craigster:
FWIW, it seems I always have gotten slightly better accuracy from the IMR versions, and therefore always used them as my first choice. But now that Hodgdon owns IMR, they might just be the same powder. Hodgdon doesn't make, and has never made their own powder. Maybe we've been buying IMR in Hodgdon packaging all along and just didn't know it. Wink
 
Posts: 249 | Location: Australia | Registered: 13 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have used them both and the H 4831 SC meters a bit better. Not a great deciding factor but if all else is equal..... Just an observation, Worth what you paid for it.


Although cartridge selection is important there is nothing that will substitute for proper first shot placement. Good hunting, "D"
 
Posts: 1701 | Location: Western NC | Registered: 28 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Croberts
posted Hide Post
ramrod340,
It has been a while since I loaded any for it, I think it was 63, it was compressed, so work it up.


A man should never stop learning, so a man should never stop asking questions
 
Posts: 164 | Location: Abingdon Va. | Registered: 09 March 2005Reply With Quote
<allen day>
posted
I started out loading the .270 Win. with H4831. Later, I went to IMR 4831 because I could acheive the same or better velocity and equal accuracy with less powder, so my loads weren't as compressed.

Today, I don't load the .270 Win. all that much, but I would seriously experiement with H4831SC, H4350SC, Reloader 22, plus IMR 4831.

One of my friends is a fine custom riflebuilder, and he recently had trouble getting a .270 he built for a client to shoot the way he wanted it to. He told me that finally he tried H4350SC, and with that powder accuracy became stellar.

It pays to experiment.........

AD
 
Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've used H4350 and H4831SC---both work well but now I only use H-4831sc in my 25-06.

IMPORTANT--IMR-4831 and H-4831 ARE NOT THE SAME.
IMR is hotter and will cause the primer to back right out of the case and jam the action.
 
Posts: 139 | Location: Oregon | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
RL19 & then for a bit slower, IMR7828. 7828 is just perfect in my .280 especially w/ 160-175gr bullets.


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Either 4831 is excellent, I would worry over the two...

I use some old 4831 surplus powder and it will better any of todays powder by a 100 FPS in a .270 and at less pressure, its the same stuff that Jack O'Connor used...

I saw some of this for sale in the Classifeid section here on AR...Its worth the money.


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42299 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I, too, use some hoarded surplus WW II era 4831, but that's not an option for Leo and not what he asked.

There have been at least five versions of 4831: Original surplus; "newly manufactured" IMR from DuPont (later IMR, now Hodgdon); Hodgdon 4831 "newly manufactured" from Scotland; Hodgdon 4831 made by ADI, and Hodgdon 4831 Short Cut also by ADI.

The IMR version is very little different in speed than 4350. I find no advantages to it. The H-versions are somewhat slower and better adapted in speed to the .270, in my opinion. Anecdotal evidence indicates that the SC version is slightly slower than the regular version despite Hodgdon's claims that they are identical.

My recommendation: First choice should be H-4831 (in whichever version you prefer). Second choice would be IMR 7828, which is only a tad slower than the original surplus 4831. Powders like RL-22 (Norma MRP) are in the right burning range, but are infamous for lot-to-lot variation. If your chamber/barrel is a bit "loose", meaning that it digests more powder than typical, then the faster 4350 might do okay, but in most .270s 4831 will do better.
 
Posts: 13274 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia