Regards
Ray
For a 30-06 (which is .308), at 100 yds, I have grown to expect a minimum of 0.692. Out of every 100 rounds, I get one wild-ass load which falls out of that parameter.
For the reloads I do for my friend's 300 Win Mag (also 0.308), achives the same degree of confidence.
Pistola - 357 Mag I have achieved a 0.143" grouping at 25 yards reloading in mass.
What I do NOT like about the Lee seating die is a) I have to play Lewis & Clarke during my initial load's seating to ensure proper depth; b) Rifle dies specifically: tend to mar the surface around the tip of the bullet which becomes clearly discernable only in strong sunlight at the range due to the design of the seating adjustment screw.
I do like the low cost however that this time and will continue to use it until at such time as I can blow another wade of cash for something better.
Best regards,
Alex
If money is not a big deal, I believe that Redding is a step above the Lee press and dies. The machining quality of Redding is quite high. I still turn my expander buttons and inspect the dies, however, I am pleased with the results across the board. Considering that I have over 14 die sets for various calibers, I have a lot of experience with Redding.
Another thought - If you are really after supreme loading accuracy, consider the Sinclair Arbor Press with Wilson die sets. I use this setup for my competition and varmint rifles. You can achieve amazing precision with this gear.
Z
Technique in seating bullets with standard seaters can also aid in reducing runout. Progressively rotating the cartridge as you seat the bullet can significantly reduce runout with the seaters which bear on the meplat. Redding, or any seater, which either fits the bullet used or which bears on the ogive in seating, will be inherently be more accurate. Bob