Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
How accurate is velocity in determining how close you are to the max chamber pressure? I'm concerned because I'm wanting to experiment with faster burning charges in .308 for my Striker with the 15" barrel. I can envision getting a pressure spike that may not be reflected in the velocity of the bullet, but may go beyong the safety margin. Was thinking about going to a magnum primer with less powder, among other possibilities. [ 10-24-2002, 18:26: Message edited by: savageshooter ] | ||
|
one of us |
Look at the maximum velocity in reloading manuals for your propellant. The max velocity for that powder is usually what they have determined to be near safe SAAMI maximum FOR THAT POWDER. In your case you will have to determine velocity loss for each inch of barrel length difference between their test barrel and yours. Anywhere from 25fps to 40fps per inch. Use 40fps for safety. After this you will have to be very observant of external pressure signs, none of which are absolute, and back off the load if any are observed. Be very wary of faster propellants for which there are no published loads, such as pistol powders. The pressure spikes on them can be extreme at much lower velocity and can be quite dangerous. | |||
|
one of us |
savageshooter......if you are looking at a "faster" burning powder because you have a short barrel, it doesn't work that way. Burn rate has more to do with case capacity and bore diameter than barrel length. It's hard to go wrong with either RL15 or varget in a 308 especially with bullets in the 150 to 165 grain weight.....180 grains and above you might check out IMR 4350 as a pretty good powder. | |||
|
one of us |
I don't quite understand why a faster powder wouldn't work better in the short barrel. It seems from the muzzle flash that some energy is being wasted, and may cause a disturbance on the bullet's exit. Aren't they determining how much powder they use based on a long barrel? Do you know of any books on the science of powder, chamber volumes, etc? Just seems to me that you could use pistol powder, working up from a pistol-size load until you reached the max chamber pressure. | |||
|
one of us |
Unfortunately some of the things we think we know by intuition aren't true. For example a load reaches achieves max pressure very quickly and certainly within the first inch or so of movement. The bullet continues to accelerate down the barrel but the big pressure is over. Let me give you an example of tests others have done. Take a rifle with a 28" barrel and select 10 different powders of various burn rates and load them until you reach a safe maximum pressure for each and then rank them by the velocity achieved. Cut off 2" and reshoot to determine velocity...the result is the powders will still be ranked the same. Velocity will be lower and some may decrease more than others but the rankings fastest thru slowest will remain the same. You can do this down as far as you want but the relative rankings will always stay the same. Muzzle-flash is another concept and is basically powder not fully burned coming out the barrel but the amount is insignificant as their is always some partially burned and/or unburned powder in the barrel after a shot....it has no impact on pressure or velocity. If you can get a copy of the latest Nosler manual they have loads listed for pistols using rifle rounds...check out the powder they use and compare it to that used in the rifle section. If you read magazines like "Varmint Hunter" which is very good for technical articles or "Rifle Shooter" which sometimes has good articles look for articles by Dr. Ken Howell and Mic McPherson as they rarely fail to satisfy. Rick Jamieson of Shooting Times is also quite good. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia